Better think twice about being a good samaritan

Discussion in 'Odds & Ends' started by goober, Dec 21, 2008.

  1. goober

    goober Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,491
    Last edited: Dec 21, 2008
    #1
  2. ollinger

    ollinger Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    6,142
    This is human ethology. As a species lives in greater and greater crowding, the rules of social interaction become more formalized and restricting. It's not a surprise that this happened in a heavily populated state; you would never see a court act this way in a sparsely populated region.
     
    #2
  3. 10s talk

    10s talk Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    578
    no

    typical libs
     
    #3
  4. LuckyR

    LuckyR Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    6,404
    Location:
    The Great NW
    California is a Progressive state that leads the nation in many areas. Law is not one of them. The rulings coming out of Cali are so lacking in judgment on both the criminal and civil side it is scary.
     
    #4
  5. Nanshiki

    Nanshiki Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,285
    Worry not... karma tends to make things like this work out in the end.
     
    #5
  6. JohnnyCracker

    JohnnyCracker Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2007
    Messages:
    696
    At first I thought the same as you guys but after reading the case I'm having second thought.

    Unless the car is on fire you should never move an injured person. Unless you're a trained professional you should not attempt to move an injured person because you wouldn't know what the heck you're doing therefore chances are you will cause more injuries.

    If indeed she was in a panic and acted irrationally (yanking the injured person out like a rag doll unncessarily), she is liable for aggravating the injuries.

    There's nothing there that encourages people to let people die in a burning car. The car was not on fire.
     
    #6
  7. goober

    goober Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,491
    I am sure the person being sued is worrying. Even if he is found not liable, he will spend countless hours in a trial, pretrial preparation and tens of thousands of dollars in lawyers fees, expert witnesses, ect. If he is found liable and hit with a large settlement, he will probably have to declare bankruptcy. This incident occured in 2004 and has made it the Cali Supreme court. He already has spent almost 5 years and who knows how much money on this case and the trial hasn't even started.

    It is easy to say don't worry if you are not the one involved. :|
     
    #7
  8. goober

    goober Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,491

    Well the coworker did say that he thought the car was going to explode which is a possible reasonable expectation after a major car accident. Also you are misreading the broader interpretation of this ruling. While the car was not on fire in this specific case, pulling somebody from a burning car is considered non medical care. One of the dissenting judges in the case said it best:

     
    #8
  9. JohnnyCracker

    JohnnyCracker Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2007
    Messages:
    696
    She was the only one who thought the car was going to explode. Nobody else at the scene did ("None of the others reported seeing signs of an imminent explosion"). And she dropped the injured person close to the same car that she thought was about to explode. Seems like she didn't know what the heck she was doing. I think "panicking" is the right description. She was only trying to help though. Too bad for both parties.
     
    Last edited: Dec 22, 2008
    #9
  10. mistapooh

    mistapooh Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2004
    Messages:
    573
    I was taught in first aid that you should always ask the victim if they want your help, because they have the right to refuse your care.

    If the victim's body is contorted in any way, then it's best you leave them alone and don't try to move them. If the person is unconscious, but have poor vital signs, then you can proceed and give first aid. It's a tragic situation, but Van Horn did what she did with good intentions. I hope the best for all of them.
     
    #10
  11. raiden031

    raiden031 Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Messages:
    5,997
    I think they should teach this kind of stuff in high school because nobody really knows what they are supposed to do in situations like this. I'd have to read more of the details, but I would say the person shouldn't be financially ruined for panicking and making a mistake during this incident. How is any normal person supposed to even know about this law?
     
    #11
  12. FloridaAG

    FloridaAG Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,176
    Location:
    Hollywood/Key West, Florida
    I did not read this article so don't know these specific facts, but many states have either statutes or legal precedent which provides that if you voluntarily assume the duty (act as a good samaritan) - you have an obligation to do so reasonably and can be liable for damages arising from your actions.
     
    #12
  13. 10sfreak

    10sfreak Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2006
    Messages:
    698
    Location:
    Georgia
    And hence the warning to be careful about being a good Samaritan...:cry:
     
    #13

Share This Page