I can appreciate that, which is why I tried to make my 300 Tours work for 2 years against better judgment, just because they were so precise. But with the London I personally don't lose that much precision/control, and I gain more pop, tons better ball quality, and the addictive BB feel. But honestly, if you competed again, you wouldn't consider a beefed-up London? I think that's why I see a clear distinction in the two lines. The "feel" of each respective line seems to be the drawing point for differing players at this point. I realize that there are clear performance distinctions as well, but you seem to prefer that crisper feel of Volkl more, while I clearly prefer the BB 11 and London--I would call both comfortable, but raw and responsive. Don't get me wrong though, if BB didn't exist, I'd likely hit a Volkl; it's the closest thing.