Buh Bye Stanford...sorry Fedace.

Discussion in 'College Tennis Talk' started by Jakes On A Plane, May 21, 2010.

  1. Jakes On A Plane

    Jakes On A Plane Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2009
    Messages:
    404
    Clayton couldn't even win his match at #3. Choke.
     
    #1
  2. Jakes On A Plane

    Jakes On A Plane Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2009
    Messages:
    404
    Congrats to the 7 people in the poll who chose Stanford to lose in the Round of 16.
     
    #2
  3. SirSweetSpot

    SirSweetSpot Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2009
    Messages:
    539
    Too bad, so sad fed-ahh-chee
     
    #3
  4. socaltennnis

    socaltennnis Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2008
    Messages:
    188
    Obviously. UCLA has been in at least every quarterfinals or better for the last 20 years while Stanford has not.
     
    #4
  5. Puredrivetennis

    Puredrivetennis Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    394
    agreed. ucla is too tough throughout the whole lineup and a much better tournament team.
     
    #5
  6. HunterST

    HunterST Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2009
    Messages:
    3,412
    Man, Clayton is a huge disappointment. He went from a start athlete at number one to struggling at #3.
     
    #6
  7. Fee

    Fee Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    7,308
    Location:
    In front of my computer, obviously
    Now you see why members of this forum have been begging Fraudace to change his avatar for at least two years. He cursed Alex and ruined his career just as he cursed Matt Bruch before that.
     
    #7
  8. SirSweetSpot

    SirSweetSpot Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2009
    Messages:
    539
    ^^ Certainly can't help.
     
    #8
  9. Tennis_Crazed

    Tennis_Crazed Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    609
    Location:
    Grind City
    hahaha come on guys..don't hate on someone for supporting his team!!

    Norcal sports fans are like that!
     
    #9
  10. chrisplchs

    chrisplchs Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2004
    Messages:
    879
    What a shot by Barte on match point. She is by far the most versatile player/best all court game in women's college tennis. I normally do not cheer for Stanford but I'll make an exception this time as I can't stand seeing cheaters win.

    That said, Florida Gators are going to be hard to be in the finals
     
    #10
  11. SirSweetSpot

    SirSweetSpot Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2009
    Messages:
    539
    Fedace, could you find out if Alex thinks I'm cool?
     
    #11
  12. Joeyg

    Joeyg Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2004
    Messages:
    748
    Location:
    Sarcasm, USA
    Maybe he can introduce you to Destiny?
     
    #12
  13. LeeD

    LeeD Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    36,436
    Location:
    East side of San Francisco Bay
    Alex is still a very good player, and an overacheiver considering his actual skill and natural talent.
    Stanford doesn't have the big hitter power potential guy, someone who can make the step to Men's Pro....or women's pro. They have a bunch of hard working blue collar guys who maximise their potential, but they are not great athletes.
    No serve, no weapons. I mean at THEIR level.
     
    #13
  14. SuperDuy

    SuperDuy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,518
    Thats true leed there is better athletes out there.
     
    #14
  15. LeeD

    LeeD Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    36,436
    Location:
    East side of San Francisco Bay
    Yeah, it was evident in the Ojai finals, both Stanford's men and women's finalists having major flaws in their game for the next level.
    Woman finalist was tiny, not all that fast, and relied on perfectly placed shots.
    Mens, I thought lefty had a serve. Nope, he only has a wide slice. USC guy was 15-25mph FASTER on first serves, and could hit forehands faster too.
    Naturally, Stanford lost both finals to superior athletes. Women's, bigger stronger athlete.
     
    #15
  16. chrisplchs

    chrisplchs Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2004
    Messages:
    879

    I wouldn't say that. Clayton is one of the best ball strikers in college tennis (at least when I saw him last year). His problem is his lack of movement and condition. Maybe guys like Hirshman and Wire are blue collar but Clayton is an excellent talent. He has great skills off the ground but needs improvement elsewhere.

    Klahn is nasty good but mentally he is awful. Thacher is also mentally weak but different from Klahn. Thacher just can't seem to focus for an entire match while Klahn is too temperamental
     
    #16
  17. LeeD

    LeeD Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    36,436
    Location:
    East side of San Francisco Bay
    Klahn is lefty, mostly mental stability challenged, like all lefties ...:oops:
    Me included.
    But none of the top 3 have a real pro level serve.
     
    #17
  18. farmpro

    farmpro New User

    Joined:
    May 17, 2010
    Messages:
    26
    Clayton and Klahn routinely hit first serves 120+ so I'm going to have to say "no" to that one...
     
    #18
  19. Fedace

    Fedace Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2006
    Messages:
    23,292
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Bradley is probably one of the most mentally tough if not the toughest player on the team. He is model student athlete. He is also a very kind and generous person as well. World would be a better place with more people like him.
     
    #19
  20. aphex

    aphex Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,263
    Location:
    athens, greece
    a model, a student and an athlete...wow!
     
    #20
  21. LeeD

    LeeD Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    36,436
    Location:
    East side of San Francisco Bay
    1. 120 mph serves is averagedly slow in pro level.
    2. They might be solid citizens, but you must not have watched them mentally fall apart in the Ojai finals. Watch it!
     
    #21
  22. fruitytennis1

    fruitytennis1 Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,092
    Location:
    I wish i knew
    Is 120 really slow for average at the pro level? Not talking like top 10
     
    #22
  23. ClarkC

    ClarkC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2008
    Messages:
    3,767
    Location:
    Charlottesville, VA
    No. Federer rarely hits much over 120. Placement is much more important when you already hit 120 than cranking it up to 130 would be.
     
    #23
  24. aphex

    aphex Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,263
    Location:
    athens, greece
    nonsense. don't listen to this fruitcake...he claims he used to serve in the mid 130s 40 years ago...
     
    #24
  25. okdude1992

    okdude1992 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    Messages:
    3,267
    bahahahaha. that is believable
     
    #25

Share This Page