Can anyone explain this DQ?

Discussion in 'Adult League & Tournament Talk' started by Cindysphinx, Aug 20, 2010.

  1. Cindysphinx

    Cindysphinx G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Messages:
    15,095
    The guy in question self-rated as a 3.5 in 2009. Played many matches in 2009 in 7.0 and 8.0 mixed; never played spring adult season.

    Computer moved him up for 2010 to 4.0. He then played two matches in the winter mixed season, both with computer-rated 3.5 partners. The computer DQ'd him and moved him to 4.5.

    I cannot figure this out. Since he played with 3.5 partners, he was OK to play 8.0 mixed with these 3.5 partners even if he had been a 4.5 all along. So why would he be DQ'd?
     
    #1
  2. Steady Eddy

    Steady Eddy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,546
    Location:
    Arizona
    How can we know from what you've told us? (How come the board's been so boring all summer?)
     
    #2
  3. Cindysphinx

    Cindysphinx G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Messages:
    15,095
    What information is missing?

    The guy played two 8.0 matches with 3.5 women. If he's a 4.5, then he's playing at the right level. Had his partners been 4.0 women, then of course the bump to 4.5 ought to result in a DQ and forfeit.
     
    #3
  4. Steady Eddy

    Steady Eddy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,546
    Location:
    Arizona
    I just mean to say that I don't get it. :confused:
     
    #4
  5. OrangePower

    OrangePower Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,091
    Location:
    NorCal Bay Area
    Perhaps he was not DQd by the computer but rather as the result of a complaint investigation. Seems like 2 matches is too soon for a DNTRP based DQ.

    Maybe he deliberately lied on his original self rate and was not initially caught. But when this was now discovered, his 2010 mixed results were forfeited as a punitive measure.
     
    #5
  6. Cindysphinx

    Cindysphinx G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Messages:
    15,095
    OrangePower, that's the only explanation I can think of also.
     
    #6
  7. amarone

    amarone Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    514
    Location:
    Atlanta
    What did it say in the letter he should have got telling him he was DQed? I believe that distinguishes between a dynamic DQ and a self-rate grievance DQ.
     
    #7
  8. Cindysphinx

    Cindysphinx G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Messages:
    15,095
    I don't know. I've never met the guy. Someone suggested that he join a team I am not captaining, so I don't think I will ever know.
     
    #8
  9. catfish

    catfish Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2007
    Messages:
    792
    Seems like the strangest ratings come from mixed doubles matches. I don't know why, but maybe rating calculations from mixed only compare men to male opponents and women to female opponents. So maybe the 4.0 guy happened to play several 4.5 men at in mixed doubles, and the computer considered him competitive with 4.5 men. I have seen some strange DQ's, bump-ups and bump-downs based on mixed only league play. The computer must only compare you to same sex opponents, and if they are a higher or lower level you may be moved up or down. Thats all I can figure out.
     
    #9
  10. amarone

    amarone Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    514
    Location:
    Atlanta
    The issue Cindy is asking about is not why he got bumped to 4.5, but why he was DQed from 8.0 mixed when a 4.5 is allowed to play with a 3.5.
     
    #10
  11. catfish

    catfish Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2007
    Messages:
    792
    My comment really applied to rating calculations in general, and could explain a DQ or a bump-up. He was not DQ'd from playing mixed, he was DQ'd and moved from 4.0 to 4.5. So he can still play 8.0 mixed with a 3.5 partner. And my comment is just a guess. I don't have any inside info on ratings and how they are calculated. I made an educated guess on why people get DQ'd & bumped up or down based on mixed only league play.
     
    #11
  12. amarone

    amarone Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    514
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Maybe Cindy can clarify, but it looks to me as if she is saying that he was DQed from playing 8.0 mixed.
    Just moving him 4.0 to 4.5 would be a bump-up, not a DQ.
     
    #12
  13. Cindysphinx

    Cindysphinx G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Messages:
    15,095
    Yes, he was DQ'd on his 8.0 mixed team, when both of his partners were computer-rated 3.5s at the time. That's why it's so weird.

    I know both 3.5 ladies, and both would be on the low-mid range of 3.5, FWIW.

    If he was DQ'd for a self-rate grievance, why weren't his 2009 results affected? There would be no need to reverse all of the outcomes, of course. But there should be a (DQ) next to his name for all of those matches, right?
     
    #13
  14. amarone

    amarone Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    514
    Location:
    Atlanta
    2009 is history. DQs only affect the current championship year, I believe.
     
    #14
  15. vagabondma

    vagabondma New User

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2009
    Messages:
    17
    There is another reason players get DQ'ed. An 8.0 team from our section went to nationals in 2009. They then signed up for an 8.0 team in winter of 2010. According to the rules, teams that go to nationals must move-up or split-up. The split-up rule means that no more than three players can still play together at that level.

    About mid-way through the season, one of the league coordinators noticed that this 8.0 team had four people signed up from the previous 8.0 team. So the last person added was DQ'ed. Nothing to do with wins, ratings, etc. The two matches he played in were hence DQ'ed as well.
     
    #15
  16. decades

    decades Guest

    the computer noticed that he was playing matches above his self rate and officially rated him there. he probably won the matches, correct?
     
    #16
  17. rainman007

    rainman007 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Messages:
    150
    Did it reverse his scores or just say DQ by his name?? If it didn't reverse his scores i'd say he could keep playing..
     
    #17
  18. amarone

    amarone Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    514
    Location:
    Atlanta
    This does not happen. At least, not just because of playing at a higher level. Doing well against higher-level opponents would increase his dynamic rating, though.

    And again, the point is not that he was rated 4.5 but that he was not allowed to play 8.0 with a 3.5 partner. 4.5 + 3.5 = 8.0, so why was he DQed from 8.0 mixed?
     
    #18
  19. amarone

    amarone Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    514
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Not correct. If it says DQ you cannot play at that level any more.
     
    #19
  20. catfish

    catfish Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2007
    Messages:
    792
    I don't understand this either. I'm wondering if the local league suspended him for some other reason, but players were calling it a DQ? A rating DQ is done by the computer, and a Sectional Rep would notify the player.
     
    #20
  21. Cindysphinx

    Cindysphinx G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Messages:
    15,095
    AHA!! That has to be it!!!

    He went to nationals in 2009 on an 8.0 mixed team, winning all of his matches. I'll bet the problem was exactly what you say, vagabondma.

    Nice work.

    [​IMG]
     
    #21
  22. catfish

    catfish Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2007
    Messages:
    792
    It makes sense now. The National split up rule is something that TennisLink wouldn't catch. Another captain must have caught it and notified the local coordinator. This guy must have been registered in Tennislink after 3 others from his previous team.
     
    #22
  23. Cindysphinx

    Cindysphinx G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Messages:
    15,095
    Yeah, I see it now. He registered after his two co-captains from the 2009 team and after his partner from that team.

    The moral of this story is that you should register the instant your captain gives you the team code!
     
    #23

Share This Page