clements stencil

Discussion in 'Pros' Racquets and Gear' started by pcpshortbus, Aug 6, 2006.

  1. pcpshortbus

    pcpshortbus Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Messages:
    388
    im watching espn2 and clement is playing murray but i was wondering why clement has a head stencil and then a smaller head stencil near the throat of the racket... if it was for the strings wouldnt the bigger one already be advertising it?
     
    #1
  2. Rabbit

    Rabbit G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    12,606
    Location:
    at the bottom of every hill I come to
    The new standard seems to be the larger stencil is for the frame and the lower, smaller stencil is for the strings. Head is just utilizing as much billboard space as they can.

    And, the answer to your question is no. There are lots of players who use strings and pay for them and don't stencil.
     
    #2
  3. LowProfile

    LowProfile Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,441
    He got it. It's not necessary to use a stencil for a string that you actually buy yourself, but players must stencil when they are sponsored by a string company. Ex. Davydenko or Sampras.
     
    #3
  4. pcpshortbus

    pcpshortbus Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Messages:
    388
    so does federer buy his own strings? he doesnt have a luxilon stencil on his racket
     
    #4
  5. Freedom

    Freedom Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    1,205
    Nobody, to my knowledge, has a Luxilon stencil.
     
    #5
  6. OccasionalTennis

    OccasionalTennis New User

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2005
    Messages:
    41
    I can't think of any of the big players that have luxilon's stencil. But I've seen plenty of challengers players with them. Lux. probably didn't want (or need) to fork the cash out for stenciling in the contract. You can see how people obsess over pro's setups on these boards.
     
    #6
  7. slice bh compliment

    slice bh compliment G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2004
    Messages:
    10,049
    Occasional Tennis is correct. You've seen it on pro's racquets. Guga comes to mind. I think JCF as well. Their stencil art consists of that small angular L with the dot to the side. Fairly subtle, unless you're looking for it I guess.
     
    #7
  8. Furthermore, a Luxilon stencil does not apply to Federer because he uses a hybrid only.
     
    #8
  9. thetenniskid07

    thetenniskid07 Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2005
    Messages:
    636

    People that hybrid with 2 different brands don't stencil.
     
    #9
  10. thetenniskid07

    thetenniskid07 Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2005
    Messages:
    636
    yup yup
     
    #10
  11. thetenniskid07

    thetenniskid07 Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2005
    Messages:
    636

    Robredo and Berdych does/ did
     
    #11
  12. DariusRaiden

    DariusRaiden Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2004
    Messages:
    230
    Players don't have a string stencil if a company has purchased "exclusive rights" to their stringbed. In the case of Federer, Hewitt, and others, their racquet companies buy the string so that no stencil art is necessary. Did anyone notice how Baghdatis and Wawrinka no longer have string stencils? Well its because they have made ranking jumps and now their racquet companies buy the string for them so no logo is required. Racquet companies must think it makes them more money by having a player advertise only their company(not having people thinking about Luxilon or Babolat when they use a Head racquet).
     
    #12

Share This Page