Come on Roddick...

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Doubles, Jan 14, 2011.

  1. Doubles

    Doubles Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 4, 2010
    Messages:
    4,289
    Location:
    Approaching the net
    I doubt it will happen, but I would love to see this guy take the Aussie Open. I never win the Racket bracket anyways, so I picked him to win the Finals over Murray. Will it happen? No chance. But I'm curious to see how Roddick does...
     
    #1
  2. cknobman

    cknobman Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2007
    Messages:
    6,100
    Location:
    Saudi Arabia
    I honestly see him having trouble against Monfils.
     
    #2
  3. Doubles

    Doubles Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 4, 2010
    Messages:
    4,289
    Location:
    Approaching the net
    Personally, the only guy that I think will give Roddick trouble is Federer, who he will have to play in the semis...
     
    #3
  4. single_handed_champion

    single_handed_champion Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2010
    Messages:
    1,104
    Roddick will have his hands full with any aggressive top-20er with a good serve (apart from the top guys, of course). He was outplayed in every which way by Soderling in Brisbane, losing pretty much every rally played, while Soderling smashed winner after winner.

    He is seeded to play Federer in the QF, and has Monfils in his 1/8th. Methinks Monfils will emerge from that section.
     
    #4
  5. Underhand

    Underhand Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    6,212
    Location:
    Serve'n Valley
    RodDick is done. Get over it.
     
    #5
  6. li0scc0

    li0scc0 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    2,173
    Monfils wears himself out, while Roddick is a grinder. I could see this being a match where Monfils wins the first set, then halfway through the second falls apart. Say what you want about Roddick, but he will attempt to gut a match out. Monfils wastes so much energy, unless he beats Roddick in straight sets, I see Roddick winning.
     
    #6
  7. cknobman

    cknobman Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2007
    Messages:
    6,100
    Location:
    Saudi Arabia
    True Monfils does screw around too much on court.
     
    #7
  8. Big_Dangerous

    Big_Dangerous Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2010
    Messages:
    6,018
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Yeah I have Monfils taking him down, but either way Roger is going to take down the winner of that match, so it really doesn't even matter.
     
    #8
  9. Fate Archer

    Fate Archer Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,669
    I think either Monfils or Wawrinka will take him out, unless he comes back to play agressive tennis all of a sudden, like last year.
     
    #9
  10. yellowoctopus

    yellowoctopus Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2006
    Messages:
    1,420
    Location:
    the present
    I share your optimism toward Mr. Roddick, but exclusively from the logic of wanting to see more of the two giants being challenged.

    Other than that, it's really hard to feel sorry for him. Envy is much easier; although probably not the healthy path.

    [​IMG][​IMG]
     
    #10
  11. li0scc0

    li0scc0 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    2,173
    Wawrinka, I could see an 'on' Wawrinka giving Roddick fits.
     
    #11
  12. Commando Tennis Shorts

    Commando Tennis Shorts Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,708
    Roddick has a pretty straight shot to Federer in the quarters, but you never can tell---Roddick has a tendency to lose to unseeded players in majors. If I were a betting man, though, I'd say that since Roddick's draw looks pretty good for him, I see him making it to the quarters, which is fine.
     
    #12
  13. tvp900

    tvp900 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    217
    Lets look at the last losses Roddick has had in majors other than the french-

    US Open - 4 sets - Tipsarevic was playing low percentage tennis and crushing the ball as hard as possible
    Wimbledon - 5 sets - Lu is a quick scrambler who had nothing to lose and caught Roddick with mono
    Australian Open - 5 sets - Cilic was the same as Tipsarevic, low percentage tennis that worked
    09 US Open - 5 sets - Isner served HUGE and had nothing to lose
    09 Wimbledon - 5 sets - Federer is Federer after all
    09 Australian Open - 3 sets - Federer is Federer is Federer

    They've all been relatively close and were determined by the bigger server and/or ballstriker. Hardly Roddick's fault.
     
    #13
  14. cc0509

    cc0509 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    14,756

    HA, HA, HA, HA! At least I had a good laugh! :)
     
    #14
  15. Big_Dangerous

    Big_Dangerous Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2010
    Messages:
    6,018
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    How is a straight sets beat down close?

    Why discount the French? Because Roddick isn't a clay court player? That's kind of crappy, that's even more of a reason to pick against him.
     
    #15
  16. Doubles

    Doubles Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 4, 2010
    Messages:
    4,289
    Location:
    Approaching the net
    I have more respect for Roddick now, knowing that he's reppin' the D in this picture, that, and his wife...
     
    #16
  17. Doubles

    Doubles Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 4, 2010
    Messages:
    4,289
    Location:
    Approaching the net
    Well, Roddick really does suck on clay. By this point in time, I would completely rule that slam out for him, he might as well skip it. His game isn't really meant for clay, which is why he plays so few clay events...
     
    #17
  18. tvp900

    tvp900 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    217
    Hey, I'm the first to admit that he's a sub par clay courter, so any 'roddick's a s****y clay courter' remarks are totally warranted and I'd even join in.

    As for the straight sets beat down, I consider 6-2, 7-5, 7-5 relatively close. Considering how Fed dismantled Del potro 6-3, 6-0, 6-0, I'd say Roddick did pretty well.
     
    #18
  19. Bryan Swartz

    Bryan Swartz Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 8, 2010
    Messages:
    1,763
    I think Wawrinka is a much bigger threat that Monfils -- only because I'm about to give up on Monfils ever becoming the player he could be(clearly a Top 5 talent IMO).

    I def. agree that the most likely result for Roddick is a return to the quarters and a loss to Federer, probably in three straight sets. But really, that should be Roddick's goal in the three Slams he can make noise in: don't lose to anyone outside the Top 5, and play aggressively once you meet them. Any Slam he can do that in is a success for him. .
     
    #19

Share This Page