I know there's been a lot of talk on this board about the ugliness and inadequecy of Jim Courier's backhand. With his extreme grip and baseball-like swing....it's not exactly a textbook stroke. But after watching him on the senior circuit, I'm wondering whether this weakness is a little overblown. It's obvious it's not quite up to par with his devastating forehand, but I would even venture to say it's a better shot than roddick's backhand. I was watching the forget-courier match recently and forget's backhand was much more of a liability than courier's. Forget mostly hit defensive slices. What do you guys think? Was it that bad of a shot?