Courtballistec 1.3 and 2.3 size comparison

Discussion in 'Shoes and Apparel' started by jamesriadi_23, Sep 10, 2010.

  1. jamesriadi_23

    jamesriadi_23 New User

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    Messages:
    22
    Hi guys, im planning to order the courtballistec 2.3, i was wondering if the fit is exactly the same with the 1.3s or is the fit somehow different? because i wear a size 8 in the 1.3s, should i order size 8 too for the 2.3s?
     
    #1
  2. remrusty

    remrusty Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Messages:
    238
    Location:
    Adelaide, Aus
    also can someone let me know if there is more room for toes in the 2.3?
    the 1.3 had no depth for toes.
     
    #2
  3. hcb0804

    hcb0804 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2009
    Messages:
    2,286
    yes same size in both fit me
     
    #3
  4. hcb0804

    hcb0804 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2009
    Messages:
    2,286
    2.3 has less depth for toes than 1.3
     
    #4
  5. i suck at tennis

    i suck at tennis Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2008
    Messages:
    366
    Location:
    MS
    I wore a 9.5 in the 1.3 and the 9.5 in 2.3 was way smaller and tighter. I didnt try a 10 because the Vapor fit me perfectly.

    If I were you I would order 8 and 8.5 and return the one that didn't fit
     
    #5
  6. kimguroo

    kimguroo Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2008
    Messages:
    2,857
    it's really hard to tell.
    I wore 7 for 1.3 but 7.5 is more comfortable for 2.3.
    I tried 7 and it was not that bad though.

    you should try, since everyone's feet shape is different....:confused:
     
    #6
  7. staedtler

    staedtler Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 29, 2006
    Messages:
    402
    It'll be a lil tighter with the 2.3, if you get the same size as the 1.3. Toebox seems a lil smaller on the 2.3. I got the same size in both.
     
    #7
  8. jamesriadi_23

    jamesriadi_23 New User

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    Messages:
    22
    thanks guys, i think im gonna order 8.5, since my feet are still growing anyways :)
     
    #8
  9. rafakin

    rafakin New User

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2010
    Messages:
    6
    yes, 2.3 is bit smaller than 1.3
     
    #9
  10. remrusty

    remrusty Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Messages:
    238
    Location:
    Adelaide, Aus
    you serious? i felt the thick skin of the 1.3 made it tight, and hoped the thinner 2.3s would give more toe room?
     
    #10
  11. -Bobo-

    -Bobo- Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2010
    Messages:
    473
    The reason people are saying that the 1.3 is bigger in the same size in the 2.3 is that the 1.3 ran half a size large compared to most shoes going by standard sizing, so if you want roughly the same size in a 2.3 go half a size bigger than what you wore in the 1.3
     
    #11

Share This Page