Differences between the dunlop biometric f 2.0 tour and the m 2.0

Discussion in 'Racquets' started by Shawn James, Aug 16, 2014.

  1. Shawn James

    Shawn James New User

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2006
    Messages:
    72
    any thoughts, which plays better
     
    #1
  2. LeeD

    LeeD Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    37,318
    Location:
    East side of San Francisco Bay
    Count the strings, check the stiffness, check the weight.
    Note what you like and compare.
     
    #2
  3. SpinToWin

    SpinToWin G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2014
    Messages:
    10,679
    Location:
    Germany
    stiff and stiffer. Hollow and hollower. Dunlop has really made a blunder with its new racquet lines.
     
    #3
  4. tom4ny

    tom4ny Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2005
    Messages:
    782
    I was play testing various frames and chose the F2.0 amd M2.0 over the Head Prestige and Wilson 6.1. They are all fine frames but I liked the blend of power, control, and feel that I got with the Dunlop's.

    Coming from years of playing with an 18x20 and softer flex I thought that I would settle on the F2.0 but I went with the slightly lighter, slighter stiffer M2.0. It gives me just a little more power and spin but still has fantastic control. The F2.0 is softer and has great feel for a modern frame. I have mine strung with Kirshbaum Pro Line II 17 at 52 pounds and have no arm issues. Many people like Black Widow but for me it has a weird feel and I like the softer PL II which generates plenty of spin for me.
     
    #4

Share This Page