Federer just won the Wimbledon, simply playing better than Nadal, end of discussion. Yet, all some people can talk about is how great Nadal played, and how he played "better". If he played better, he would have won. He didn't. All this talk about "if not for Federer serving so well" is non-sense. The serve is a part of the game, the most important part (on any surface). How about if not for Nadal passing so well, or playing slightly above his normal level on a variety of other areas? And of course there were all of the nay-saying dimwits like Mats Wilander saying that Federer had "no balls" or heart. Yet, in this match, he won both tie-breaks, and turned it on in the last set when the momentum was against him. That's balls and heart. Few of his detractors seemed to have revoked their statements. Wilander's website is down for repair -- maybe he's embarassed by his stupid comments.