Djokovic is unbeatable in Australia

Discussion in 'Pro Match Results and Discussion' started by YodaKnowsBest, Jan 27, 2011.

  1. YodaKnowsBest

    YodaKnowsBest Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2010
    Messages:
    1,668
    Location:
    Strong Era aka Novak-Novak era
    You believe me now?
     
    #1
  2. batz

    batz G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    14,566
    I do mate, I do :)
     
    #2
  3. Underhand

    Underhand Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    6,154
    Location:
    Serve'n Valley
    I don't believe you, even when you ask a question.
     
    #3
  4. Speranza

    Speranza Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,008
    Location:
    Baker Street, London Town
    Holmes: Now now Yoda, I replied courteously in your other thread as to why I don't think he is, accounting for his full history of the tournament in comparison to Federer's :) And there was no reply... ;)

    That said, I stated a while back that I can't see Fedal taking the AO this year...

    That said 2. Novak is playing great, from both wings, with determination. As it stands, he thoroughly deserves to win it.
     
    #4
  5. aldeayeah

    aldeayeah Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2009
    Messages:
    3,985
    That's right. Only heat, cramps, blisters, back ache, asthma, sore throat and Andy Roddick can stop him.
     
    #5
  6. kishnabe

    kishnabe G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    17,107
    Location:
    Toronto
    Murray/Ferrer thinks otherwise...though want Djoko to win!
     
    #6
  7. Overheadsmash

    Overheadsmash Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2010
    Messages:
    774
    I have never seen anyone manhandle Rog like that. He was making him miss a lot.
     
    #7
  8. Telepatic

    Telepatic Legend

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Messages:
    7,167
    Location:
    Serbia, Belgrade
    Yoda knows best, doubt Yoda and you get lightsabered.
     
    #8
  9. Pseudonym

    Pseudonym Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    Messages:
    385
    I said Djoko would go to the finals vs. somebody not Fed/Nadal after I saw his first match at the AO '11.

    I guess I was right.
     
    #9
  10. ark_28

    ark_28 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2010
    Messages:
    4,108
    Location:
    England/USA
    You taking him to win the title now?
     
    #10
  11. Fedex

    Fedex Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,635
    Location:
    Dundee
    Who exactly are you talking to?
    I saw this coming since USO.
    Not rocket science really the way he's been playing.
     
    #11
  12. Fedex

    Fedex Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,635
    Location:
    Dundee
    It's rhetoricaltastic.
     
    #12
  13. Pseudonym

    Pseudonym Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    Messages:
    385
    I mentioned it in another topic, but yes, Djoko all the way, and deservedly so.
     
    #13
  14. iriraz

    iriraz Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    3,973
    Djokovic has always played well in Australia or Us Open when he gets to the last couple of rounds in the tournament.He might not win every big match but he always gets himself a chance.
    His biggest hurdle has always been surviving those day matches in the heat.He could have gone in first round last year at the Us Open and this year he got fortunate Dodig ran out of gas in set 3 in his second round or it could have been another brutal match
     
    #14
  15. Bartelby

    Bartelby G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    12,361
    ... which means he likes cool, dead courts.



     
    #15
  16. li0scc0

    li0scc0 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    2,173
    If Djokovic hits more errors than winners he will lose against Murray in the final.
     
    #16
  17. ark_28

    ark_28 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2010
    Messages:
    4,108
    Location:
    England/USA
    Totally agree and sorry didnt see the other post till now! Djoker playing sublime tennis backed up his Aus Open form and has beaten Federer so it wouldnt be a default win! as would be the case with Murray by avoiding Fedal! As lon as Djoker keeps his head am very confident he will win the title.
     
    #17
  18. GhostDog

    GhostDog Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2009
    Messages:
    1,640
    Location:
    Toronto
    Djoker will win that title if he continues to play like he did. It's pretty rare to see anyone boss around Fed on the tennis court like Djoker did last night. He was in beast mode.

    I'm hoping to see a Djokovic vs Murray final, though I think Ferrer could upset Murray.
     
    #18
  19. batz

    batz G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    14,566
    Oh here we feckin go. Murray isn't even in the final yet and we've got cretinous pre-emptive assertions seeking to devalue a win he hasn't had yet.

    Tell me, was Roger's first slam win a 'default win'? He only played two seeds, never faced a top five player and played the world number 48 in the final.

    Muppet.
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2011
    #19
  20. batz

    batz G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    14,566
    Did you miss the Shanghai final?
     
    #20
  21. Fedex

    Fedex Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,635
    Location:
    Dundee
    You could argue this back and forth.
    Djokovic avoided a tough match in the sun when Troicki retired after one set.
    Take it that doesn't count in your winning by default logic?
    Your hatred of Murray is really clouding your view.
    I see you're from little England.
     
    #21
  22. YodaKnowsBest

    YodaKnowsBest Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2010
    Messages:
    1,668
    Location:
    Strong Era aka Novak-Novak era
    It's quiet now... I love the sound when *******s have nothing to say.
     
    #22
  23. Speranza

    Speranza Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,008
    Location:
    Baker Street, London Town
    Holmes: Pah, no you don't, you love cutting them down :) May you enjoy today (and Sunday if Novak wins) and rejoice in your shining light!
     
    #23
  24. Bloodshed

    Bloodshed Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2009
    Messages:
    1,158
    Location:
    Orléans, Canada
    While I'm a little disappointed with the outcome, I pray to god this new improved Djokovic is a permanent one. I don't mind rooting for him if he plays like that all the time.
     
    #24
  25. Hitman

    Hitman G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    May 2, 2010
    Messages:
    11,435
    It's extra quiet around here, because *******s AND *******s have been forced to eat humble pie. The classy Federer and Nadal fans don't need to constantly be saying how their player is God. These guys play on a very elite level, and on any given day, anyone can lose. Kudos to Federer and Nadal that they have managed to do what they have done, despite the strains of being expected to perform day in and day out.
     
    #25
  26. Spider

    Spider Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2007
    Messages:
    2,247
    Location:
    UK
    Djokovic's form is really impressive and looks to be tough to beat. But beating Federer is one thing and beating Murray is a whole different story.

    I would wait before I start my celebration, if I were you.
     
    #26
  27. Bloodshed

    Bloodshed Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2009
    Messages:
    1,158
    Location:
    Orléans, Canada
    Don't get your hopes too high yourself either. If Murray plays the way he played vs Dolgolonopov and Ferrer plays the way he played vs Nadal, Murray is in trouble.
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2011
    #27
  28. Hitman

    Hitman G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    May 2, 2010
    Messages:
    11,435
    I have to say, you're on the money with this one.
     
    #28
  29. YodaKnowsBest

    YodaKnowsBest Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2010
    Messages:
    1,668
    Location:
    Strong Era aka Novak-Novak era
    I wanted to reply but the thread was deleted. :(
    Djokovic is unbeatable here since 2008 and with unbeatable I mean only against the players. He's still vulnarable against the heat and some flu's.
     
    #29
  30. YodaKnowsBest

    YodaKnowsBest Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2010
    Messages:
    1,668
    Location:
    Strong Era aka Novak-Novak era
    I still can't figure out who's failure I enjoy the most. Today I will enjoy Federer's and compare it with Nadal's from yesterday.
     
    #30
  31. Spider

    Spider Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2007
    Messages:
    2,247
    Location:
    UK
    Here's an interesting fact -- Murray has beaten Djokovic the last three times they played.
     
    #31
  32. meg0529

    meg0529 Guest

    I will believe it, if he wins. I think he looks great, and is probably the fav now, but it's not over. Murray hasn't faced a real test yet, you never know!
     
    #32
  33. Bloodshed

    Bloodshed Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2009
    Messages:
    1,158
    Location:
    Orléans, Canada
    Well I don't know about you but I thought Dolgolonopov gave Murray quite a scare. He already had his first test, he's about to get another one.
     
    #33
  34. NamRanger

    NamRanger G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    13,916


    He played the world #48 who beat Stepanek, Agassi, and Grosjean on his way to the final.


    He also played Roddick who was the 5 seed. Schalken who was the 8 seed. Both who were/are absurdly good players on grass. He also played Mardy Fish and Felciano Lopez, both who are also really good on grass. Just remember, do your homework before trying to compare this slam to Murray's current potential slam, which has been filled with hacks other than Melzer, who flat out didn't even play anywhere close to his potential, and Dolgopolov, who is a rookie, and although potentially dangerous, really shouldn't be a threat to Murray if Murray is as good as you and others say he is.






    Try doing it in a slam, Federer simply does not redline in a Masters even if it is a final. The only non-slam tournaments he redlines in these days are Basel and the World Tennis Final. Occasionally he will try and redline at a Masters BEFORE an important event, such as Madrid in 2008, but he rarely does that unless he has been playing poorly. Notice how in years past that Federer has won Cincinnati despite the fact that historically he has done pretty poorly at that tournament? If you discount his horrible 2008 performance against Karlovic, he has won 3 out of 4, beating very tough opponents on his way to the title. And this is a title that is notorious for top players tanking. Why then does Federer play hard here? Because it is right before the USO, and he wants to tune his game up.



    Stark contrast to say IW and Miami, although important tournaments, are not followed up by a slam. Federer historically used to dominate those tournaments, and no longer does.


    Djokovic's win is impressive because he straight up man handled a Federer who wasn't playing poorly at all. In fact, Federer was playing as well as he could considering the circumstances.
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2011
    #34
  35. meg0529

    meg0529 Guest

    Actually, you are right. Forgot about that match. Dolgo was all over the place during that match, but Murray played really well too.
     
    #35
  36. Polvorin

    Polvorin Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    817
    Don't forget those darned contact lenses :)
     
    #36
  37. Polvorin

    Polvorin Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    817
    An interesting observation and well supported. However, I think we all know the REAL reason for his Cincinatti dominance is that, being an avid reader of the TT forums, once he realized Cincinatti was in the the REAL slam, he decided he would win it every year because 20 > 8
     
    #37
  38. T1000

    T1000 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    4,342
    Location:
    Connecticut
    Your absolutely right, Federer is much harder to beat. And Murray still has to beat Ferrer.
     
    #38
  39. NadalAgassi

    NadalAgassi Guest

    I am not even a Federer fan and I will say this is a retarded thread. If Djokovic were "unbeatable" in Australia he would have more than 1 title now. And even if he wins a 2nd this year he still would be far from unbeatable. Unbeatable is someone who wins 5 or 6 titles maybe.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 27, 2011
    #39
  40. Destro

    Destro Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2010
    Messages:
    316
    Location:
    UK
    Finally we agree on something.

    And finally we can settle your petty shadowing of me on this forum, with a 3 set beat down from Andrew Murray.
     
    #40
  41. Xenakis

    Xenakis Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    Messages:
    2,431
    Come on now, careful not to tar all of us Englanders with ark-**** brush :)
     
    #41
  42. batz

    batz G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    14,566

    And if Murray were to make final and win he'd have beaten the world number 3 and the guys who beat Roger Federer.

    Roddick was ranked 6th and Shengen was ranked 12. They were the only 2 seeds he faced. Those are the facts. The rest of your post is opinion dressed as fact.
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2011
    #42
  43. rovex

    rovex Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    5,230
    A Roddick fan can simply not complain of someone else having a cake walk draw after that 2003 route roddick had.

    But a djoko-Murray final is gonna be a cracker.
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2011
    #43
  44. NamRanger

    NamRanger G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    13,916


    Except both Roddick and Schalken are better players on grass then their rankings show evidenced by their seeding. Just because Davydenko was ranked 4th at some point did not mean he was the 4th best player on grass now does it?



    Until Murray shows up and beats Federer / Nadal in a slam, he still hasn't shown that he's gotten anywhere. He did it ONCE where he played very aggressive, and that was a very good match. I give credit where credit is due. However, he has not done that yet in recent times, and continues to fall short despite massive hype behind him.
     
    #44
  45. batz

    batz G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    14,566
    Murray has beaten Nadal twice in slams. There has been no Murray hype this year. You are talking out of your arse if you are seriously arguing that Murray winning the AO would somehow be a lesser achievement because he didn't beat Nadal or Roger. You're not really arguing that are you?

    Look Nam, I am in no way trying to diminish Roger's first slam - quite the contrary. Nor am I saying that Murray winning the AO would be a mirror image of Roger winning Wimby 2003 - it wouldn't.

    All I'm saying is that Murray winning the AO would be no more a 'default win' than Roger winning Wimby in 2003 - nor would it be any less of an achievement. You will be taking Murray hate to new heights if you think otherwise.
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2011
    #45
  46. NamRanger

    NamRanger G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    13,916


    No, Murray's slam wouldn't be diminished, he would just have won it under favorable circumstances rather than being a truly elite player and actually "winning" it. Some players are simply not good enough to win slams, and need favorable circumstances to win a slam. It doesn't make their slam any less then any other player who has won one, but it would be ludicrous to say that Murray's "potential" slam didn't have some fortunate luck behind it.



    It's like saying Kafelnikov didn't have some luck in winning his slams (probably the luckiest and most fortunate player of recent times, despite the fact that I freaking love Kafelnikov); certain players need a little more fortune than others. You would be blind to think that in a time like this where Federer and Nadal have a total stranglehold on tennis, that Murray isn't somewhat fortunate.
     
    #46
  47. Raoul_Duke

    Raoul_Duke Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2008
    Messages:
    979
    Location:
    Gonzoland
    So did Federer ... 'till very recently :mrgreen:
     
    #47
  48. rovex

    rovex Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    5,230
    So you would have absolutely no problems with accepting this for Roddick?
     
    #48
  49. TBrady

    TBrady Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2010
    Messages:
    295
    Location:
    On a court hitting big top
    And Federer wasn't fortunate for having Nadal eliminated from 09 French Open semi only to have to face Soderling in the final? You have fan boy rose tinted glasses on.
     
    #49
  50. Speranza

    Speranza Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,008
    Location:
    Baker Street, London Town
    Holmes: Ooh! Ooh! Can I play? What about Ralph's win at the US Open last year? Talk about- ah, forget it.....

    This type of argument could go on and on, as could most over the last 48 hours. Whoever wins it on Sunday, will no doubt deserve it!
     
    #50

Share This Page