Does anyone find it disparaging that Roger refers to Nadal's game as "wierd"? I do. A little off the court gamesmanship perhaps? I think so. I don't think Federer means "wierd" in a good way, although it's possible to use "wierd" in a good way. For example: I think it's wierd that Federer can competently serve-and-volley and approach-and-volley, but is just as competent playing from the baseline. It's wierd in that it's unique. When Federer calls Nadal's game wierd, I'm not getting that vibe. Maybe that's just me. Nadal doesn't seem to be taking as many swings, minor as they are, through the press as Roger. I'm still rooting for Roger though to win the final. I'm thinking he'll get it done in 4. We'll see.