Does Roddick deserve a spot in the HOF?

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Bjorkman & Johnny Mac, Nov 3, 2009.

  1. Bjorkman & Johnny Mac

    Bjorkman & Johnny Mac Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2009
    Messages:
    127
    Roddick has had a pretty solid/decent career but hardly a great one much less an all time great one in comparison with other all time greats. Obviously he will most likely go in. Since Chang was inducted it appears they have dropped the standard of going into the HOF a bit. But if they kept the requirements higher to be legit HOF (where as you should attain 3-4 slams at the very least) should Roddick make that cut if the standards were a bit higher as I think they should be to be honest. Should you really deserve to be in a HOF with 1 slam to your resume?
     
    #1
  2. Blinkism

    Blinkism Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Messages:
    8,598
    It's the Hall of Fame

    There's no denying Roddick's fame and name recognition around the tennis world.
     
    #2
  3. zambo

    zambo Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2009
    Messages:
    81
    No. He gets too much praise and is overrated.
     
    #3
  4. NamRanger

    NamRanger G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    13,916
    When you consider the circumstances, I think so.
     
    #4
  5. NamRanger

    NamRanger G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    13,916


    On these forums he is one of the most underrated players there is. Oh, and go away Maximo.
     
    #5
  6. zagor

    zagor Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    25,781
    Location:
    Weak era
    Yes,given the current HOF standard he qualifies-reached #1,won USO and DC,multiple slam finalist and great consistancy in staying in top 10.

    Should HOF standards be more harsh? Maybe but given as they are,he gets in.
     
    #6
  7. TMF

    TMF Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Messages:
    21,042
    There’s plenty of other players that are below Roddick but made the HOF. He won 1 slam, and just b/c he constantly lost to Roger doesn’t diminished all of his run at the slam. Plus, he consistently ranked high throughout his career. Excluding Roddick is ridiculous.
     
    #7
  8. Perry the Platypus

    Perry the Platypus Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2009
    Messages:
    176
    Are you kidding me? Given current standards he is an absolute lock, but even if the bar were raised he is a more than worthy candidate.....

    8 Consecutive years in the top ten.

    Reached #1 ranking

    Was year end # 1 in 2003

    Won the U.S. Open

    3 time Wimbledon Finalist and 1 time US Open Finalist (all losses to one R. Federer)

    Davis Cup Champion

    Has won over 500 matches

    Overall match win percentage is 76%

    By any measure Roddick has had an exemplary career. Is he the GOAT - of course not, but he is absolutely a HOF worthy player.
     
    #8
  9. rosenstar

    rosenstar Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Messages:
    1,142
    He's been in the top ten for the past 10 years almost. He's played through, and competed with two different generations of players, Not to mention one year at Number 1, a US Open title, a Davis Cup, and holds a Davis Cup record or two. He's no Nadal/Federer, but surely a hall-of-famer.
     
    #9
  10. TMF

    TMF Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Messages:
    21,042
    You are hard on Roddick is just to get back at people who believe 09 Roddick would beat 08 rafa at SW19(which is plausible btw).
     
    #10
  11. drakulie

    drakulie Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    24,466
    Location:
    FT. Lauderdale, Florida
    Based on the current standards>> hell yes.

    Based on standards such as the Baseball Hall of Fame, NFL ,etc>>> hell no.
     
    #11
  12. Blinkism

    Blinkism Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Messages:
    8,598
    Andres Gimeno is in the HOF, his highest ranking is #49! He does have an AO final and a Wimby semi under his belt.

    And like someone said, Michael Chang made it - why shouldn't Roddick?
     
    #12
  13. r2473

    r2473 Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    Messages:
    6,966
    Yes. The HOFF loves Andy too.

    [​IMG]
     
    #13
  14. elquien

    elquien New User

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2004
    Messages:
    86
    I don't keep up with the HOF. I wonder who lower standard is? I am not familiar with all the players that have been inducted so I will withhold making an uninformed opinion this one time. There's a concept!

    http://www.tennisfame.com/famer.aspx?pgID=867
     
    #14
  15. elquien

    elquien New User

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2004
    Messages:
    86
    the HOFF. That is hilarious!

    It depends. The HOFF in Germany that is should be in a the Berlin Wall museum or the HOFF in the US that is drunk and eating cheeseburgers off the floor?
     
    #15
  16. Bjorkman & Johnny Mac

    Bjorkman & Johnny Mac Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2009
    Messages:
    127
    You make a good point.. Should tennis increase their legitimacy and standard to the level of the MLB, NFL etc?
     
    #16
  17. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    34,762
    Roddick is getting into the hall. Slam winner, World #1, Davis Cup player, fastest server, Federer nemesis - it is a done deal.
     
    #17
  18. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    34,762
    How many of them were on steroids? Roddick is clean.
     
    #18
  19. CMM

    CMM Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,713
    [​IMG]
     
    #19
  20. Cody

    Cody Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    Messages:
    543
    Can't argue with those stats there :)
     
    #20
  21. THUNDERVOLLEY

    THUNDERVOLLEY G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    10,307

    zambo is Maximo? Oh, joy.
     
    #21
  22. Anaconda

    Anaconda Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2009
    Messages:
    3,880
    Except for being a spannermonkey, what did this guy get banned for?
     
    #22
  23. T1000

    T1000 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    4,341
    Location:
    Connecticut
    Of course, anyone who beats the second best clay courter in the world 3 times in one year deserves it
     
    #23
  24. RCizzle65

    RCizzle65 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,928
    Why do people post just to start arguments?
     
    #24
  25. IvanAndreevich

    IvanAndreevich Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    7,493
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    Yes 10char
     
    #25
  26. Leelord337

    Leelord337 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    3,911
    Location:
    univ houston courts
    yes, he sparked a new movement making tennis "cool" in 2003+ . i mean who didn't own an andy roddick hat or have the babolat pure drive :)
     
    #26
  27. Cfidave

    Cfidave Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,188
    Location:
    Elmira,NY
    He, no doubt will make the tennis HOF, but in comparison to other members such as Agassi, Sampras, and Courier, he pales in comparison. So far he has won only one slam, and his number one ranking lasted for a whole 4 months, much of it at the very end of 2003. Those two accomplishments are comming up on 7 years ago. However, his consistency as a top 10 player can't be denied
     
    #27
  28. Polaris

    Polaris Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2005
    Messages:
    2,306
    :) ........
     
    #28
  29. VGP

    VGP Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2005
    Messages:
    6,311
    Location:
    Location: Location
    Again, another "does he/she deserve it" HOF thread....

    There's definitely a singles bias, but even in the realm of singles, I don't think just because someone "only" has one slam, the standards are too low. Players are put up for consideration and votes are cast by ballot by over 100 people. A nominee has to earn over 75 percent of voter approval to be inducted into the IHOF.

    For players, it's not just titles that gets you inducted, sportsmanship and ambassadorship go a long way too. Plus, there's the international team competitions.

    BTW - I think this coming year is a doubles heavy year. I think great doubles teams Gigi Fernandez/Natasha Zvereva and Todd Woodbridge/Mark Woodforde are potential nominees......

    Also, would the advent of coaching specialists fall under the "contributor" category?

    BTW - Roddick's not just a Davis Cup player, he's a Davis Cup winner.
     
    #29
  30. maddogz32

    maddogz32 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2009
    Messages:
    481
    Location:
    texas
    i feel that anyone who wins a slam and does so well in many other tournaments such as the davis cup should be in the HOF
     
    #30
  31. LiveForever

    LiveForever Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2009
    Messages:
    656
    Wow this guy got banned . I was curious to how he knew all the posters so well for only being here 3-4 days.
     
    #31
  32. lawrence

    lawrence Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,878
    Sorry but I was rockin the Hewitt cap and the yonex's :D
     
    #32
  33. Ripper014

    Ripper014 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2009
    Messages:
    1,863
    I personally do not feel he is over-rated... more so perhaps underachieved. He was also unfortunate to play inbetween the era's of such players as Sampras, Agassis, Nadal, Murray and Federer.

    The only era that may have had a deeper field would be from the mid 70's to the early 90's, personal favorite decades of tennis. A time when tennis could be played a number of different was ways and still be effective in the professional ranks.

    Sorry getting a little off topic. Roddick is a great player... he had a large impact in the sport, he just was not able to come up with the big wins. I don't know for sure... but I believe he does have quite a number of tournament wins under his belt just not majors. If not for the quality of his peers he may have faired much better... he has reached to Wimbledon finals only having to face Federer and how many have defeated Federer at Wimbledon.
     
    #33
  34. jaap deboeck

    jaap deboeck Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2004
    Messages:
    207
    HOF? Hmm...magnificent 2003. ARod has won 2 of the last 53 Masters events (including his worst surface, clay) and 0 of the last 24 slams.

    Hall of Fame? Despite the Wimby choke, I'm sure he'll get in, though if AR gets in so too should Kafelnikov. Andy is the 9th best American of the Open era.
     
    #34
  35. cuddles26

    cuddles26 Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2006
    Messages:
    936
    So now Roddick played in the era of Sampras!?! ROTFL!!! That is funny. As for Roddick and Agassi they are only 12 years apart in age, and shame on Roddick and his contemporaries (other than late blooming Federer) for allowing Agassi to sort of have an era into his 30s. Unlucky to directly be in an era of Nadal?! Nadal and Roddick havent even played in a slam since 2004, and up until 2007 Nadal wasnt seriously contending in any slams outside the French (other than 06 Wimbledon). Murray is 5 years younger than Roddick, and didnt reach the top 10 until the first year in 6 years Roddick ended outside the top 6 himself. So ok you have Federer.

    You really think Roddick would rack up slams in the 90s when he went 1-5 vs a 30-something Agassi head to head!?
     
    #35
  36. jamesblakefan#1

    jamesblakefan#1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2007
    Messages:
    15,712
    Location:
    VA Beach
    I don't think you can just scoff over the fact that if Fed didn't play in this era, he'd have at least 3 more slams if not more. Not giving excuses - Roddick should have stepped up and won some of those matches vs Fed, this yr at Wimbledon for one - but that's just fact. Fed always seems to play his best tennis vs Roddick, and Roddick's just been unfortunate to be on the other side of the net in some cases.
     
    #36
  37. Anaconda

    Anaconda Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2009
    Messages:
    3,880
    I agree, as much as i like roddick i feel that he is good enough to have won a few slams against Federer. He's had his chances, unfortunately he hasn't took them just yet. Still has time on his side.

    The same goes for Hewitt and safin too......
     
    #37
  38. tacou

    tacou Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Messages:
    6,999
    Roddick is not an all time great but you need to look at HOF standards. It's not an elite group, it's all the "very good" tennis players, and Roddick is very, very good.

    If someone with Roddick's credentials isn't in the HOF then it becomes just a short list of the greatest players of all time, rather than a fun commemoration of some of the most entertaining and talented players of the game
     
    #38
  39. tintin

    tintin Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Messages:
    1,438
    Location:
    none of your damn business
    yeah he'll get it due to his fluke USO and Davis Cup wins
     
    #39
  40. jamesblakefan#1

    jamesblakefan#1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2007
    Messages:
    15,712
    Location:
    VA Beach
    How was DC a fluke? Even as a Blake fan I have to admit he's carried the US DC team for many years. Just look at his record in DC, it's up there w/ the likes of McEnroe, Ashe, etc. That's definitely worth something.
     
    #40
  41. Bjorkman & Johnny Mac

    Bjorkman & Johnny Mac Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2009
    Messages:
    127
    Possibly.. But is Roddick truly that great of player where you can just start handing him slams in another era? I assume Sampras would have relentlessly destroyed Roddick at Wimbeldon over and over. You have Goran around too. Better at wimbeldon in the mid 90s on grass than Roddick is. USO the same would probably hold true as Pete is better at the USO as well. See 2002. Though there are maybe 1 or 2 Roddick could grab but Rafter in the late 90s was no pushover there. Very solid . We saw what an Andre in his early to mid 30s was doing to Roddick. Roddick could handle a slower, older version of Andre who was still very good no doubt about that but not what he was at 25, 29, 30, and in his younger 20's. Unless you put Roddick against Andre in his down years 96-97 etc. ANd who knows what kind of matchup issues other players would pose as well
     
    #41
  42. jamesblakefan#1

    jamesblakefan#1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2007
    Messages:
    15,712
    Location:
    VA Beach
    I'm not saying Roddick would have 4 or 5 slams in the 90s, but I'd definitely say more than 1. 2-3 slams in the 90s wouldn't be that hard for A-Rod, IMO. The 90s outside of Pete was full of inconsistent players. Even Andre was inconsistent during the 90s. Consistency is Roddick's strength. He'd have been a contender in the 90s, right up there w/ the guys you mentioned competing for slams.
     
    #42
  43. srinrajesh

    srinrajesh Guest

    Davis cup is also pretty high if he was instrumental in his country winning it e.g. winning 2 singles matches in the final / SF etc

    Roddick wud definitely get into the HOF currently becos it contains too many people and is a slight misnomer because they induct 1-2 players every year now ... i would say the actual HOF may have some one inducted once every 4-5 years and they can probably choose players with criteria such as
    1) Multiple slam winners along with multiple finals over at least 2-3 year period
    2) Davis cup winners
    3) People excelling in multiple surfaces present during his / her career
    4) No. 1 Ranking
     
    #43
  44. Anaconda

    Anaconda Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2009
    Messages:
    3,880
    Roddick will cement himself in HOF when he wins a slam next year......
     
    #44
  45. To answer the OP:s question...-ABSOLUTELY!!!
    He has been Federers (the same one who is considered the best ever) 1st and 2nd toughest competitor for 6-7 years!
    Without Federer Roddick imo would have had 3-5 GS. I really feel sorry for Roddick at times.
     
    #45
  46. boss-man-boss

    boss-man-boss Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2009
    Messages:
    13
    It's so obvious that you are GameSampras it's unbelievable.........
     
    #46
  47. How would you know??
    You joined less than 5 days ago and your first post is post no 46 in a thread...smells fishy ! :twisted:
     
    #47
  48. boss-man-boss

    boss-man-boss Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2009
    Messages:
    13
    i searched the forum for a while before i became a member.
     
    #48
  49. You did huh, ok thats great...
    :twisted:
     
    #49
  50. DarthMaul

    DarthMaul Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,306
    Location:
    Asuras
    Of course he deserves it! He was #1, he owns the record for the fastest serve, he was consistent over the years, etc. If there wasn't the guy called Federer, he would have been a multiple grand-slam champ by now! He definately IS in the HOF.
     
    #50

Share This Page