Dunlop AG 300 4D Tour vs. Head Radicals?

Discussion in 'Racquets' started by jasonmiller, Sep 4, 2009.

  1. jasonmiller

    jasonmiller Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    214
    The specs are pretty similar(esp. the lm rad), and pictures look like the mold is probably close too. So, does anyone have access to both to see just how close the head/throat profiles really are? Has anyone played with both and can lend some insight on the differences?
     
    #1
  2. jasonmiller

    jasonmiller Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    214
    Nobody? Really??
     
    #2
  3. mrmo1115

    mrmo1115 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    Messages:
    3,967
    To me , its preference on the grip shape. I am a Head user and I really liked the 300 Tour, but the difference of grip shape and size swayed me away and I am still with my Head racquet.
     
    #3
  4. jasonmiller

    jasonmiller Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    214
    That's what I had in mind, but in reverse. I'm a Dunlop/Wilson grip fan, but otherwise really enjoy the Head Radicals. I'd be really interested in the AG300 tour if it plays like a Rad but with a Dunlop grip...
     
    #4
  5. mrmo1115

    mrmo1115 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    Messages:
    3,967

    To me, Cup8489 summed it up for me and basically you as well..

    If your not a Head user, it'll take a long time to get used to and give you the same feeling that I have from trying to move onto other companies that aren't Head.
     
    #5
  6. jasonmiller

    jasonmiller Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    214
    So any actual playing comparisons? Anybody else have anything to add?
     
    #6

Share This Page