I know the paper specs on these two frames and currently use the 200 (18x20). Have also looked at the feedback and comments in this section. I have the chance to acquire a new 200 Tour cheap and wanted to ask other 200 users about the Tour. My favorite aspect of the 200 is its extraordinary precision, relatively low power, and ability to crush the ball. On paper the 200 Tour is even more stable than the 200. I have a few concerns... 1. With its more open string pattern and extra heft is the Tour significantly more powerful than the 200? Or does the 95" head and soft flex mitigate that power potential? 2. TW customer reviews mention the weight but many said it felt lighter than the specs. Is generating RHS a problem with this frame? 3. How does control compare to the 200 18x20 veesion? I'm sure the 18x20 is probably more control oriented but I've tried some other 95" frames with 16 mains and they felt pretty good control-wise (eg the BLX Pro Staff 95). Is this a ball-sprayer or will it still satisfy a control freak? One review in particular caught my eye. The customer wrote an initial review about disliking the Tour having used the 18x20 version. He later posted an update saying that after spending more time with the Tour he decided to switch to it. What say you 200 experts? Is the Tour an unmanagable monster? Or does its slightly more open pattern provide a bump in spin potential while retaining precise control?