Dunlop Muscle Weave help

Discussion in 'Racquets' started by Zeppy, Jul 31, 2008.

  1. Zeppy

    Zeppy Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2008
    Messages:
    308
    Hi, I recently bought a Dunlop 200g Muscle Weave and after comparing is with other photos, the racket seems to have some differences. I was wondering if I got the real deal or if I got pulled a fast one.

    Here are some photos

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    #1
  2. Zeppy

    Zeppy Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2008
    Messages:
    308
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Thanks for your time.
     
    #2
  3. Zeppy

    Zeppy Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2008
    Messages:
    308
    #3
  4. mauricem

    mauricem Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    129
    the first thing you need to do is to learn how to take a photo:), then avoid the temptation to post 12 oversized images in one thread.

    even if you're using a camera phone most have macro settings that show nice detail if used properly

    Back on topic your 200g MW Tectonics (from what I could discern in the images) looks identical to my genuine ones, what were you concerned about?
     
    #4
  5. Bent

    Bent Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2004
    Messages:
    409
    Location:
    Copenhagen
    I have 3. They are all a little different in cosmetics, but are still the same racket.
     
    #5
  6. Pushmaster

    Pushmaster Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,768
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    ^^ Right, some have "Midplus 95", some just "95" graphics on the top hoop. Same racquet though.
     
    #6
  7. 0d1n

    0d1n Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    3,692
    Location:
    Cluj-Napoca, Romania
    The racket is legit. Nobody will bother faking such models anyway ... if you buy new models (especially Wilson and/or Babolat) from the bay then you should watch out ... but I don't think there's much money in faking a Muscle Wave since Federer and Nadal don't play with a paint job of one.
    People who are searching for these rackets will be able to tell generally if they are genuine, so there's no point in making fakes.
    My 2 pence
     
    #7
  8. Zeppy

    Zeppy Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2008
    Messages:
    308
    Oh I see. Haha, I didn't think the images would be that big. My apologies. Well, what concerned was that there's nothing on the in sides of the throat. I mean, there's no specifications written or anything.
     
    #8
  9. phucng_10

    phucng_10 Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    923
    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    Such big pictures. Those who are using Dial-Up would probably DIE! Haha, well anyways, back on topic. This racquet is different from the original 200G. The difference is the Muscle Weave technology that comes along with this newer version of the 200G. I would take some pictures of my 200G but it's in my friends tennis bag.
     
    #9
  10. LafayetteHitter

    LafayetteHitter Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,954
    Location:
    Lafayette, Louisiana
    Dial up, whats that? There are still people in the world using dialup? I'm spoiled I suppose having a T1 at home....
     
    #10
  11. 0d1n

    0d1n Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    3,692
    Location:
    Cluj-Napoca, Romania
    Guess what ... if anybody still uses dial up in this century ... then they deserve to...DIE :) :oops:
     
    #11
  12. phucng_10

    phucng_10 Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    923
    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    Lol, I still know a few friends that uses Dial Up because their family isn't so rich to even get DSL... It's better to have internet then to not have it at all.
     
    #12
  13. mltaylor

    mltaylor Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2006
    Messages:
    139
    Dunlop MW 200g 95

    Sorry to bump this.

    But that's not a MW 200g. It looks like it's a paint job of an older Dunlop model. The first pic you can see the throat area is not the same as a regular 200g.

    Maybe it was going to be a racquet for Thomas Johanssen or someone else from Dunlop. I though I heard TJ used an earlier model and had MW paintjob.
     
    #13
  14. DennisK

    DennisK Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    636
    Location:
    County Durham. England.
    Yep, it looks like a older spec Tour Pro 95 with a MW200G pj. I think Jimbo333 has one of these too - ex. Thomas Johanssen as what mltatlor has said.

    My Tour Pro 95 (newer version):

    [​IMG]

    My MW200G:

    [​IMG]

    A side profile showing the beam width would confirm this. The 200G is constant 21mm. The Tour Pro will be a dual taper design and be wider at the middle of the hoop.
     
    #14
  15. basil J

    basil J Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Messages:
    2,464
    Location:
    boston area
    I miss my 200GMW.....
     
    #15
  16. Keifers

    Keifers Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2005
    Messages:
    5,119
    I agree. That's clearly not a MW200G -- just compare the beam shapes. Looks like a Rev Tour Pro to me (a very nice stick in its own right).

    (Those photos may have been huge, but at least they were OUT OF FOCUS... Yikes! :rolleyes: )
     
    Last edited: Aug 10, 2010
    #16
  17. DennisK

    DennisK Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    636
    Location:
    County Durham. England.
    Looking at one or two of the (bad) pictures again, its definately a Tour Pro as the throat grommet piece is a dead giveaway.

    And as Keifers has said, its a lovely racket. Plays very different to a MW200G though. More power and more spin. Not quite the same buttery feel and control though.
     
    #17

Share This Page