Fed 3rd best on clay?

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by NLBwell, Jun 7, 2009.

  1. NLBwell

    NLBwell Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    Messages:
    7,130
    In the French finals telecast someone made the comment that Federer may be the 3rd best ever on clay besides Borg and Nadal? What do you guys think. How about we keep it to the Open Era to be simpler.

    Other contenders would be:
    Vilas
    Lendl
    Wilander
    Kuerten

    and maybe some others that don't come to mind right now.

    What do you think?
     
    #1
  2. BigServer1

    BigServer1 Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2006
    Messages:
    5,037
    Location:
    Scottsdale, AZ
    He's not. He's the second best (overall) of the last few years, but he'd need another 1-2 FO titles minimum to be considered third best ever. 3 FO titles, 3 FO finals, 5 clay masters shields...Then you can make a case, but not with just one FO and a handful of finals.
     
    #2
  3. Fedexeon

    Fedexeon Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    1,950
    Haha. Although i am a big Federer fan, i don't think that he's the 3rd best ever.. We have players like Muster, Vilas who were more dominant than Federer on clay, obviously!
     
    #3
  4. CyBorg

    CyBorg Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2007
    Messages:
    5,544
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    I mentioned this on another board. Federer appears to be very similar to Laver on clay. Very good, but not necessarily great. Not primarily a clay courter, but solid on it nonetheless.
     
    #4
  5. RCizzle65

    RCizzle65 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,929
    He is good on the surface, but no, I wouldn't call him 3rd best, and I don't even really know much about great clay players outside of Nadal and Borg.
     
    #5
  6. DarthFed

    DarthFed Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    Messages:
    4,468
    Location:
    Queens, NY
    Definitely not up there with the greats overall but for his era he's most certainly 2nd

    @CyBorg i agree..and it's ironic since he grew up on the dirt..but then again so did murray..and look how that turned out
     
    #6
  7. Steve132

    Steve132 Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    840
    For me Borg and Nadal are clearly the two best on clay in the Open era, followed by Lendl. After that (in chronological order) I would have Rosewall, Laver, Vilas, Wilander, Muster, Kuerten and Federer. Federer is in the top 10 but probably not in the top 5.
     
    #7
  8. grafselesfan

    grafselesfan Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2009
    Messages:
    3,594
    In the last 25 years these would be my top clay courters in order:

    1. Nadal
    2. Lendl
    3. Kuerten
    4. Wilander
    5. Muster
    6. Courier
    7. Federer
    8. Bruguera
    9. Ferrero
    10. Agassi
     
    #8
  9. FlamEnemY

    FlamEnemY Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Messages:
    3,554
    Top 3 - no way. I'd easily give him top 15 though. Maybe top 10.
     
    #9
  10. InvisibleSoul

    InvisibleSoul Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,929
    Disagree.

    Well, I'll be first to say I don't know where he ranks in terms of the best claycourters of all time, but I disagree with your argument.

    Let's say Nadal is the best claycourter of all time. Let's say he is SO good that he basically cannot lose. Even IF Federer were the second best claycourter of all time, he still wouldn't win hardly any tournaments because Nadal would always be in his way. So just because Federer "only" has one FO title, it does NOT automatically mean he is not the 2nd or 3rd or whatever best claycourter of all time.
     
    #10
  11. P_Agony

    P_Agony Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2008
    Messages:
    13,186
    He's not, but he doesn't have to be. He's likely the best hard court player ever, and he's a good contender on grass too.
     
    #11
  12. theduh

    theduh Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Messages:
    768
    Location:
    Middle earth
    No not this year. Fed is the number 1 clay courter this season.
     
    #12
  13. veroniquem

    veroniquem Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    30,972
    Location:
    New York
    Federer is probably the best overall (resultwise), so I really don't know why his fans would even care about his specific ranking on clay!
     
    #13
  14. samster

    samster Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Messages:
    5,017
    Nice compliment from a Nadal fan.
     
    #14
  15. mental midget

    mental midget Professional

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,434
    it's a stretch, but not a completely outrageous one, to say that without nadal in the picture, sunday's win could have potentially been his 5th straight rg title.

    imo he could hold his own with anybody on that list, but if we're talking records, he's still behind an awful lot of guys. at least one more win, to go with his three finals, and maybe he starts to creep into the conversation with guga, etc.
     
    #15
  16. EtePras

    EtePras Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2008
    Messages:
    733
    He is not a grinder with a huge topspin forehand and plays behind the baseline. So I can't consider him an all time great on clay, no matter what results he gets. For the same reason, I put McEnroe above Borg on grass.
     
    #16
  17. BERDI4

    BERDI4 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2005
    Messages:
    520
    You forgot Vilas. He has the record of most consecutive wins on clay. I don't think Agassi or Ferrero were better than him on clay.
     
    #17
  18. Jack the Hack

    Jack the Hack Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,803
    Here are the top 10 players with the most career titles on clay:

    1 Guillermo Vilas 46
    2 Thomas Muster 40
    3 Ilie Nastase 31
    4 Bjorn Borg 30
    5 Manuel Orantes 29
    6 Ivan Lendl 28
    7 Rafael Nadal 25
    8 Jose-Luis Clerc 21
    9 Mats Wilander 20
    10 Andres Gomez 17

    With the French Open title, Federer now has 9 clay court titles. 4 straight French Open finals with one championship is impressive, and we'll see where Federer ends up by the time he retires. However, calling him a top 5 clay court player ever is incorrect at this point. In my opinion, the top 5 is:

    1. Borg (6 French titles, 30 overall clay titles).
    2. Nadal (4 French titles, 25 overall clay titles, so far).
    3. Lendl (3 French titles in 5 finals, 28 overall clay titles.)
    4. Wilander (3 French titles in 5 finals, 20 overall clay titles.)
    5. Vilas (1 French title in 4 finals, 1 US Open on clay, 46 overall clay titles.)

    Guys like Kuerten (3 French, 14 overall clay titles), Nastase (1 French, 1 US Open on clay, 31 overall clay titles), Bruguera (2 French, 13 overall clay titles), Courier (2 French in 3 finals, 5 overall titles), and Muster (1 French, 40 overall clay titles) could either round out the top 10, or be argued into the top 5.

    In order for Federer to break into the top 5 to 10 clay court players in the Open era, he needs to win the French Open at least one more time and start collecting more clay court tournament trophies. With another 5 to 7 years on tour (which he says he wants to do), there is definitely a chance that he could scale into this category... but he's not in the top 5 (or 3) clay court players of the Open era right now.
     
    #18
  19. InvisibleSoul

    InvisibleSoul Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,929
    Once again, if Nadal is the #1 claycourter of all time, how do you expect Federer to win a lot of titles even IF he was #2 or #3 or whatever?

    He may very well be a better claycourter than the person with the second or third most amount of claycourt tournament victories, but by virtue of him having to deal with playing the best claycourter of all time, he doesn't get to win tournaments.

    Make sense?
     
    #19
  20. zagor

    zagor Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    26,042
    Location:
    Weak era
    You're giving Vilas nod over Guga and Courier?
     
    #20
  21. joeri888

    joeri888 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    13,120
    Winning 46 titles on clay.. I don't know how long the clayseason was back then, but that's impressive
     
    #21
  22. zagor

    zagor Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    26,042
    Location:
    Weak era
    Impressive but for me not enough to overlook the fact that Guga and Courier have more FOs,Courier especially I consider to be underrated claycourter,the guy navigated through some very tough draws at the FO(especially in 92).
     
    #22
  23. callitout

    callitout Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,303
    Great work Jack, but without breaking it down further into GS and MS titles it really doesnt mean anything. Umag and Rome are the same when you just count numbers. RG is obviously head and shoulders above other titles then MS and after that who cares.
     
    #23
  24. jelle v

    jelle v Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,978
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Federer isn't even top 5 imo.. probably not even top 8..

    Bruguera doesn't get mentioned often enough in this top X greatest clay courter discussion. :-|

    I think i would rate Lendl #3, and Bruguera #4 or so.. Kuerten #5 or so.. Sadly I have never seen Vilas play, so my top 10 clay courters lacks in that department.
     
    #24
  25. Jack the Hack

    Jack the Hack Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,803
    I could understand the argument for Guga over Vilas for #5. Guga won 3 French Opens in 3 finals, but only had 14 overall clay titles. Vilas made 4 French Open finals and won 1, but also won the US Open on clay, and has the most clay court titles of anyone in the Open era with 46. To me, that was more impressive. However, who really cares?

    My point was that Federer is not the third best clay court player in the Open era, and in fact, there are a half dozen or more players with better clay court resumes right now.

    I understand what you are saying, but the "Masters Series" designation for events did not begin until the early 90s. Back in the 70s and 80s, various tournaments gained and lost prestige, depending on who was sponsoring them and how many points the ATP gave out at the time. I started playing and following tennis roughly around 1982 when I was 10 years old. Outside of the Slams, I didn't have a lot of awareness of what the big events were before around '85 or so. If there is someone else that would like to take a crack at what the equivalant of a Master Series event was in the 70s and early 80s, try to determine who won what, and adjust the tournament figures I supplied... be my guest!

    The problem is that some events lose prestige, and it's hard to tell what was big at one time. For instance, for the past dozen years or so, the Hamburg tournament has been a Masters Series. However, they lost that designation this year. If someone 20 years from now looks at the stats, will they understand that Federer won several of the "big" clay court events beyond Roland Garros (like Hamburg and Madrid) if the big events have shifted to Rio and Mexico City by then?
     
    #25
  26. raiden031

    raiden031 Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Messages:
    5,997
    I think losing 1 SF and 3 F all against ONE player (Nadal) and then winning the title when Nadal is out of the picture will show that Fed is a GREAT clay court player. It was a matter of bad luck that Nadal was in his way. That just solidifies how good Nadal realy is on clay that he can beat a great clay player like Federer so many times in a row in a final.
     
    #26
  27. zagor

    zagor Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    26,042
    Location:
    Weak era
    Okay,was just interested in your reasoning.I myself would definitely put Guga in top 5 but I see your side of the argument as well.

    Agree about Fed not being the third best claycourter.
     
    #27
  28. NLBwell

    NLBwell Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    Messages:
    7,130
    The argument that Fed doesn't show how good he is in number of titles could also apply to Vilas being second behind Borg.
     
    #28

Share This Page