Fed interview

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by tlm, Jan 17, 2011.

  1. tlm

    tlm Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2004
    Messages:
    7,526
    How many saw the fed interview on espn? Fed + modesty have nothing in common. I played a great match, my forehand was great +on+on. Proving again how big his ego really is.
     
    #1
  2. rommil

    rommil Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2004
    Messages:
    7,770
    Location:
    CT
    Go ahead and ruffle some feathers :) ........


    The thing I noticed though is that Roger sounded so eager and enthusiastic, didn't sound like he was an ageing over the hill tired veteran. It was a great interview.
     
    #2
  3. Underhand

    Underhand Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    6,312
    Location:
    Serve'n Valley
    The man with the golden purse just gave up on beating Humblito in his own game.
     
    #3
  4. AM95

    AM95 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2009
    Messages:
    3,245
    haha federer's forehand was on. dont be upset because he routed the guy who bageled nadal in doha.
     
    #4
  5. bezs

    bezs Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2009
    Messages:
    8,264
    It ain't called bragging if you can back it up.
     
    #5
  6. tlm

    tlm Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2004
    Messages:
    7,526
    This is not bragging? Okay i understand this is a perfect example
    of fed lovers logic. No he was not bragging at all just humbly stating how much he is in love with himself.
     
    #6
  7. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,785
    Nadal will put an end to his bragging
     
    #7
  8. Applecider

    Applecider Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2010
    Messages:
    125
    gosh... he was probably happy the way he played. Suck it up! Do you brag about yourself when you win a match?
     
    #8
  9. jwbarrientos

    jwbarrientos Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    1,884
    It was proved Nadal was sick :roll:
     
    #9
  10. Li Ching Yuen

    Li Ching Yuen Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Messages:
    6,989
    Rumour has it he had cancer for about half an hour.
     
    #10
  11. OrangePower

    OrangePower Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,086
    Location:
    NorCal Bay Area
    Yeah I thought he did go on a bit too much. Although he did play really well, so he was speaking the truth. Still, no reason to go on about it. Maybe sending out a challenge to the rest of the field?
     
    #11
  12. MichaelNadal

    MichaelNadal Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2007
    Messages:
    30,375
    Location:
    Orlando FL
    I agree completely actually.
     
    #12
  13. IvanAndreevich

    IvanAndreevich Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    7,492
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    LOL so when you wipe someone out 6-1 6-1 6-3 you have to be modest? Not really. He played a great match, and he can say it freely.
     
    #13
  14. dlk

    dlk Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2009
    Messages:
    3,234
    Location:
    Indy
    Agree. It's better than the standard, "he's a tough player, who plays well" etc... If a player is on, I want to hear him say I was smoking today.
     
    #14
  15. cueboyzn

    cueboyzn Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2007
    Messages:
    991
    Location:
    SA
    This is what I like about Roger. He is quite comfortable speaking his mind and stating what he actually thinks, within reason, and his skills and achievements have earned him that. Contrast that to the comments Nadal comes out with, which are just pure and simple false modesty and PR crap / gamesmanship to try deflect the pressure elsewhere than himself.

    Federer is a true champion and No. 1, not needing to remove the pressure from himself through false modesty, because he in fact he thrives in that position. In fact he is quite refreshing when following the ATP bulls..t tour, where apart from guys like Roddick, 97% of the top guys as soon as they open their mouths you know it's the same PC and/or PR drivel coming out.
     
    #15
  16. nikdom

    nikdom Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    4,725
    Location:
    Tennisville

    Article here


    This is all that he really wants to say. Simple, self-aware yet respectful of the field and his chances.


    Obviously that's not good enough for reporters who want him to elaborate, he will have to say something! He can't do false modesty; what would you like to hear from him, something like this?

    "No I really don't feel that great, no? I just practise hard and it was tough opponent. I really lucky to make it to second round, no? Winning the title is almost impossible no? I only take one match at a time and for sure Simon is tough opponent. I gonna try my best no?"
     
    #16
  17. bolo

    bolo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2008
    Messages:
    11,380
    Fed. was like all I was thinking about was the borg's record at wimbledon and rafa must be the same now with the 4 in a row.

    Dude still hasn't figured out people are different.
     
    #17
  18. rommil

    rommil Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2004
    Messages:
    7,770
    Location:
    CT
    Roger played a good match, he talked about how his shots worked in the match, his forehand, dropshots and also about how he has been hitting over his backhand lately as opposed to slicing it , that he did when he was younger. Discussed about the Rafa slam as well. It was an honest straightforward interview. He also talked about approaching Rod Laver and seeing how he can help considering Laver is from the devastated area. That's more enlightening to hear than somebody mentioning having a fever, flu or no rest, or the goldfish getting a divorce.
     
    #18
  19. [Z]engin

    [Z]engin Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2011
    Messages:
    284
    He played a terrific match, admits it.

    Haters: he's bragging, he's arrogant, what a big ego he has.

    He plays a terrible match, admits it.

    Haters: he can't accept defeat, he's using excuses.


    Lol. There's nothing wrong to conclude that you played a good/great match, a lot of players say it, if I recall, Rafa 'apologized' to Soderling after he won the french for the 5th time, saying that he played his best/one of the best matches of all time.

    I guess going with the logic of the OP, Rafa is an arrogant ******* aswell? And god, there are dozens of examples of other players aswell. :neutral:
     
    #19
  20. JoelDali

    JoelDali G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Messages:
    10,749
    Watching Fed play these 4.0 guys is so comical.

    Love Roger for courage discipline best class really loving Roger today classy athlete.
     
    #20
  21. Djokolate

    Djokolate Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2011
    Messages:
    853
    Location:
    Funkytown
    haha got that spot on with thehaters
     
    #21
  22. meltphace 6

    meltphace 6 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2008
    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    /dev/null
    To achieve what RF did you need a huge ego! Get real.
     
    #22
  23. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,785
    No. Nadal has achieved more (H2H and Olympics and soon Grand Slam) and doesn't have the ego.
     
    #23
  24. TBrady

    TBrady Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2010
    Messages:
    295
    Location:
    On a court hitting big top
    Exactly, that obvious bull crap gets so old.
     
    #24
  25. Speranza

    Speranza Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,008
    Location:
    Baker Street, London Town
    Holmes: Brilliant! LoL! :)
     
    #25
  26. ManFed

    ManFed Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2010
    Messages:
    178
    Until today at 3:14 PM CT. 16 GS titles were more than 9 GS Titles. So, unless the whole universe changed. Federer has achieved more than Nadal.
     
    #26
  27. ledwix

    ledwix Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2010
    Messages:
    3,130
    ITT, the biggest achievement possible is the Olympic singles gold medal and a winning H2H against Roger Federer.
     
    #27
  28. TMF

    TMF Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Messages:
    21,373
    Stop trolling !
     
    #28
  29. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,785
    What is the point in winning Slams against losers?

    Like a 3.5 club player can be more successful than Federer by winning against more people. Does it count?

    Tennis is a mano-amano fight. The winner achieves more. Nadal is the king. By his win in this AO, he will have all 4 Slams at once, joining the elite club of Laver and Budge of which Federer is not a member.
     
    #29
  30. dandelion_smiley

    dandelion_smiley Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    974
    Hasn't Nadal been winning Slams since the 2005 French Open? How many Slams has Federer won since then? 12, well if you count Nadal as a nobody then you're right, it's all losers
     
    #30
  31. Bobby Jr

    Bobby Jr Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    7,509
    The thing people like the the OP don't seem to consider is Federer spends his life either practising, playing matches, recovering or analysing his and his opponent's matches. When he has a bad day, he knows it. When he says he thought he played well he usually says it and when he has a nightmare, such as against Berdych at Wimbledon last year, he says it.

    His matter-of-fact comments on matches are not a lack of modesty, rather a highly polished awareness of what happened - a trait which has undoubtedly helped him be one of the most dominant players in history.

    The guy he destroyed like some half-arsed practice session is ranked high enough (top 100) to be considered a good player and one who can easily make a great living playing tennis. Ironically, Fed is a little unlucky that he makes matches like this look like cakewalks - people can be forgiven for forgetting just how much insane talent, experience and preparation it takes to play that well.
     
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2011
    #31
  32. 8PAQ

    8PAQ Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    3,002
    So that means Nadal's last three Slams don't count since he didn't play Federer. So that means he holds 0 slams right now and 6 in total. :)

    I like your logic. You know, sometimes I think you are the dumbest poster here but then I remember veroniquem...
     
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2011
    #32
  33. Bobby Jr

    Bobby Jr Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    7,509
    As already pointed out: ****** logic here.

    Take all those slams Federer won since Nadal became a slam contender.... Nadal wasn't even good enough to make it as far as the people who Federer beat in the finals.

    In fact, until the FO year every single slam for over 5 years was won by Federer or the person who beat him. Nadal however was beaten out multiple times by people who were then beaten (sometimes thrashed) by Federer or someone else.

    In the real H2H that matters, *player* vs *everyone else*, Federer is still by-far the more accomplished player in slams. It's not even a close call. That's why Federer has 16 slams and Nadal has 9.
     
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2011
    #33
  34. ManFed

    ManFed Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2010
    Messages:
    178
    So. Federer victory in AO2010, FO2009 were against losers?
    Murray trash Nadal in AO2010, and Soderling did the same in FO2009. That made Nadal a bigger loser than Murray and Soderling? I don't think so.
    Your statement is pretty weak and lame though.
     
    #34
  35. 8PAQ

    8PAQ Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    3,002
    He knows all this. He is just trolling. As I pointed out above, people in Nadal News thread are even dumber because they believe in what they write. Just look at all the face palms in there. They have almost as many OCDs as Nadal. Trying to jinx Fed and antijinx Nadal. It is truly a special ed class in there.
     
    #35
  36. DownTheLine

    DownTheLine Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2009
    Messages:
    2,406
    Me no ego, ego bad
     
    #36
  37. Sid_Vicious

    Sid_Vicious G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    11,680
    Location:
    In The City
    #37
  38. Azzurri

    Azzurri Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2006
    Messages:
    7,884
    Location:
    Next door to Elisha Cuthbert.
    LOL..are you talking to yourself again TMF?
     
    #38
  39. cc0509

    cc0509 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    14,982
    He is just telling it like it is. He did play a great match.
    Is it arrogance or confidence? Maybe a little bit of both, but that is ok.
     
    #39
  40. cc0509

    cc0509 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    14,982
    Oh, Federer has figured it out, but, his analysis is probably spot on about Nadal. Nadal comes off as very humble and never admits that he is thinking about history or the records but come on, anybody with a brain knows that can't be true. Nadal just does not admit it. That is ok that he chooses to play it that way, but, in reality he must be thinking about the records and he is just not telling "us" about it. Any competitive person, in this case a world class athlete, thinks about the records or they would not be a world class athlete to begin with. Who are we kidding. JMO.
     
    #40
  41. bolo

    bolo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2008
    Messages:
    11,380
    The key is the word "probably". Your use of the word "probably" suggests that you are uncertain about whether nadal is really thinking about the 4 in a row all the time or not. Knowing this some people would put things differently. But that's not fed. and that's why fed. wears the michael jackson outfits onto wimbledon center court. ;)
     
    #41
  42. cc0509

    cc0509 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    14,982
    Well obviously I say "probably" since I am not a mind reader!

    LOL @ the Michael Jackson comment though!
     
    #42
  43. tlm

    tlm Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2004
    Messages:
    7,526
    Just saw the Nadal interview after his easy match. Of course he
    did not say he played great+that his forehand was great. Big difference one player very modest+humble while fed the egomaniac is coming on himself.
     
    #43
  44. Sid_Vicious

    Sid_Vicious G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    11,680
    Location:
    In The City
    That is all he said? That his form and forehand were good?
    Did he also mention the following arrogant facts?
    - The sky was partially cloudy
    - He drank water at the changeovers
    - He got some serves over the net
    - He played on 78 ft by 36 ft tennis court
    - He broke Lacko's serve
    - He played with his right hand
    - He had a tennis racquet in his hand.
     
    #44
  45. cc0509

    cc0509 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    14,982


    It is nice that Nadal is humble but he takes it too far. You just know he is going back to his hotel room saying to himself, "I own those other players!" :)
     
    #45
  46. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,741
    Um...so what's he going to say? I played like crap and only got really lucky to squeak out the match 6-1, 6-1, 6-3? :roll:

    I much prefer Federer's honesty and frankness to Nadal's phony modesty and humbleness.

    Oh, and I'd bet if you had a forehand as good as Federer's, you'd be bragging about it 24/7 to anyone who would listen, even in your sleep. :???:
     
    #46
  47. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,741
    Um...Nadal's opponent was injured. That's why he didn't win a single game and retired in the 2nd set. Nadal didn't have to play great to win that match. All he had to do was get the ball over the net. So there was no reason for Nadal to say he played great. All he had to say was that he got the ball over the net. :???:
     
    #47
  48. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,741
    How can someone who plays such ugly looking tennis possibly have a ego? Who brags about being ugly and looking bad? :shock:
     
    #48
  49. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,741
    Yes, that's why Nadal won the doubles tournament. :roll:
     
    #49
  50. tlm

    tlm Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2004
    Messages:
    7,526
    Sometimes maybe he takes it to far, but that is much better than taking it to far the other way.
     
    #50

Share This Page