Discussion in 'Pros' Racquets and Gear' started by grzegorzo, May 14, 2010.
Why do people keep bringing this stuff up? No he's not using a 95. Don't you know anything about racquets? The 95 series all have a more bulbous shape to them that rounds off on the PWS and the throat is also rounded and not edged like a box frame AS much. Also, the throat is more skinny and narrow where as fed's 90's have always been traditionally more flattened and wide. Don't you take notice to any of these characteristics??? They seem pretty obvious. And if you're referring to if he should ever change, well he's probably tested it not to his liking. I'm sure if he hits better with it he would be using it. I don't see why he would be holding back, so obviously he doesn't want to use it and he's not currently using it. Can we please put some thought into threads before we start taking up precious inter-web real estate with these topics, please?
no it is sstill the 90 its flatbeam
I can see where the OP might get that idea from the pic, if you look at the top of the head near the bumper-guard it's kind of hard to tell that it's a box beam, however if you just look at the throat it's easy to tell it's a 90.
isn't the 95 suppose to be super shiny?
hand looks massive
The part by his right ear looks rounded. But I think it's just the lighting
i think it's the PWS that got him confused.
Both BLX 90 and BLX 95 have PWS :-?
No no Feds got PMS
i think you guys need to calm down a little. No need to blow up for a question. Chezbeeno is right. the lighting makes the top of the hoop and the pws seem more rounded.
cork_screw, nicolaisidek, King_roger, you guys jump onto other posters too fast. take a moment to see where the poster was getting at.
no, it's just the PWS on the 95 is a bit more rounded than on the 90
They changed the pj of the 95's to be matte like the tour when they released the BLX's
the lighting makes it look like a glossy finish
Exactly, hence the confusion...
I think the new BLX paint job somehow makes his racquet look slightly bigger to what we're used to. I've thought it was bigger on numerous occasions... And of course, it might just be the angle the photo's taken from !
Separate names with a comma.