Federer : 3 Generations

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by jman, Dec 23, 2011.

  1. jman

    jman Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2006
    Messages:
    664
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    Just realised that Roger Federer has played through 3 Generations of tennis, and remains in the top 3. Sometimes I feel, he doesn't get enough recognition, and people just write him off, myself included.

    Anything is possible next year...Golden Slam =)
     
    #1
  2. Sid_Vicious

    Sid_Vicious G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    11,681
    Location:
    In The City
    Golden Slam?

    [​IMG]
     
    #2
  3. helloworld

    helloworld Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,670
    You failed. Federer wasn't a factor in the 90s. And the new generation hasn't even begin yet. So it's 1 generation, not 3.
     
    #3
  4. jman

    jman Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2006
    Messages:
    664
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    I said 'played through'
    You have to stop and read mate lol.
    Anyway he played with Sampras, Agassi, Rafter, and had some pretty good wins over them, followed by the Hewitt-Roddick generation which he performed extremely well, and now the Nadal-Djokovic generation. All i'm saying is, ppl write him off to quickly, and shouldn't.
     
    #4
  5. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,541
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    Define 'generation'. Sampras, Agassi, Rafter were 10 years older than him. Nadal is only 5 younger. I think Tomic, Harrison, Dimitrov to be the next generation, not Nadal's.

    And most player who stay on tour for 8 to 10 years play against 3 "generations"
     
    #5
  6. tennis_pro

    tennis_pro G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2011
    Messages:
    16,888
    Location:
    Poland, eating bigos and żeberka
    Ehhhmm? You forgot about the most obvious ones? Roddick, Hewitt, Davydenko, Nalbandian, Safin, Ferrero, Coria maybe?

    Federer has played the 1970-1974 generation - Sampras, Agassi, Henman, Rafter, Corretja (it was a long time ago of course).

    Then the ones I mentioned before (Safin, Hewitt etc.)

    Djokovic, Nadal, Del Potro, Murray, Tsonga in the most recent times.

    Tomic, Harrison, Nishikori and some new lads in the future.
     
    #6
  7. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,541
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    I wasn't disagreeing. I was saying that IMO, Federer, Hewitt, Nalbandian and then Murray and Nadal are all the same generation. 5 years doesnt seem like a leap. 10 years does.

    The next generation should be Tomic, Dimitrov, Harrison. And then I said: most people who play for almost a decade will play against three different generations.
     
    #7
  8. jman

    jman Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2006
    Messages:
    664
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    But Nadal-Murray-Djokovic raised tennis to a higher level. I guess, my personal opinion of generation is the level of tennis, not the age gaps. But that's just my personal opinion.
     
    #8
  9. helloworld

    helloworld Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,670
    No, they don't. :oops:
     
    #9
  10. joeri888

    joeri888 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    13,120
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKETvVqxTmk

    Now tell me they raised tennis to a higher level. They might be physically stronger and more consistent on the backhand side, but that is totally eclipsed by the sheer talent, movement, technique of that Federer. No way they raised tennis a level above that.
     
    #10
  11. Sentinel

    Sentinel Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    Messages:
    30,475
    Location:
    La Belle Époque
    Fred played 3 generations of Nadal alone, baby, peak and now old and worn out.
     
    #11
  12. jackson vile

    jackson vile Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    9,827
    It is part of the Federer mythologies that the ****s spew out all the time.
     
    #12
  13. Cup8489

    Cup8489 Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    9,253
    Location:
    Silvis, IL
    I wasn't aware that it wasn't yet 2011. OH, wait a minute.

    You don't know much, I forgot. He said 'played', not 'dominated', so you fail again. He played in 99, so it counts.
     
    #13
  14. Cup8489

    Cup8489 Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    9,253
    Location:
    Silvis, IL
    And here's the bitter ******* turned ********* who never says anything worth reading :rolleyes:
     
    #14
  15. Cup8489

    Cup8489 Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    9,253
    Location:
    Silvis, IL
    good counter argument. he says one thing, and you disagree. Therefore, you're right.

    learn to make an argument.. because you have failed twice in the same thread already. :oops:
     
    #15
  16. merlinpinpin

    merlinpinpin Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,553
    Can't agree with that. The tennis level is much lower than what Federer produced in 2004-2006 (heck, even today, he's close to the best Djokovic), the level of grinding/physicality/intensity is higher, though.
     
    #16
  17. helloworld

    helloworld Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,670
    Wow, a typical ******* getting hurt.

    So you agreed that Nadal-Djokovic-Murray raised tennis to a higher level? :shock:

    You're dumber than I thought. :oops:
     
    #17
  18. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,106
    Agassi says he played four generations. He said every 5 years a new generation emerges.

    And Agassi also won the O Gold.
     
    #18
  19. Povl Carstensen

    Povl Carstensen Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2004
    Messages:
    5,755
    Yes, I would say that 5 years is in a way a generation, but of course that is a generalization.
     
    #19
  20. Cup8489

    Cup8489 Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    9,253
    Location:
    Silvis, IL
    Odd how you can form MY opinion on the matter when I haven't weighed in one way or another...and then call ME stupid. LOL. Classic helloidiot for ya!

    Please tell me how they DIDN'T raise the level of tennis? I bet you don't actually have a decent answer ready. LOL.


    And my actual opinion is that they raised the bar on physical preparation and a well rounded game. You can't beat any of them without both a strong offense AND defense. But, djokovic has raised the bar, or rather matched the bar federer set during his peak.
     
    #20
  21. jman

    jman Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2006
    Messages:
    664
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    Hahaha thanks Cup8489, Haterz are always gonna hate lol.
     
    #21
  22. kiki

    kiki Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    18,714
    Very true, I fully agree
     
    #22
  23. Cup8489

    Cup8489 Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    9,253
    Location:
    Silvis, IL
    agree. I guess to be in their club you must know jack **** about tennis, and regularly shove your own head up your arse. I'll pass.
     
    #23
  24. anantak2k

    anantak2k Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 1, 2007
    Messages:
    587
    Location:
    Miami, FL

    I remember that match. That has to be one of the greatest matches that Federer has ever played. He made poor Hewitt look so helpless on court that day. It was an unbelievable level that day.
    On a side note: those green USO courts were so much faster than the current blue version. The current blue courts are not only a bit slower but a lot bouncier.
     
    #24
  25. droliver

    droliver Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2008
    Messages:
    695
    Location:
    Birmingham, AL U.S.A.
    What's a tennis generation exactly? Can we agree on some kind of definition chronologically.

    I kind of think players within 4-5 years in either direction of a player is kind of in their peer group. So for Federer, Rafa & Murray kind of fall in this window (while Novak is a little too far out age wise.) with players like Grosjean, Haas, Kiefer, Moya, & Kuerten towards the other end.
     
    Last edited: Dec 24, 2011
    #25
  26. beast of mallorca

    beast of mallorca Legend

    Joined:
    May 19, 2010
    Messages:
    7,780
    You my friend, are deluded. This board alone is full of Fed is GOAT thread and that he is their God, and will be back to number 1 soon etc, etc.
    If anything, the shower of praises poured on him is extreme. Fanatics at their worse/best, depending where you are in the spectrum.
     
    #26
  27. ledwix

    ledwix Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2010
    Messages:
    3,123
    Basically what this thread is saying is that Federer is an all-time great. Any all-time great, like Sampras, Nadal, etc. will be playing through times when they are younger than their rivals, the same age as their rivals, and older than their rivals, because the average age of the top 10 tends to stay around 25, but everyone individually just gets older.

    Hmm that sentence was kinda long.
     
    #27
  28. rcglider

    rcglider New User

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2008
    Messages:
    93
    Location:
    middle of nowhere
    This is gold. Can I use it as my signature?
     
    #28

Share This Page