Federer and Nadal- to become the 2 greatest players ever

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by NadalAgassi, Jan 14, 2011.

?

Will Federer and Nadal retire considered as the 2 greatest players ever

  1. yes

    76.5%
  2. no

    23.5%
  1. NadalAgassi

    NadalAgassi Guest

    By the time both Federer and Nadal retire will they be considered the 2 greatest mens players of all time. How unlucky for the others in this era if that is the case.
     
    #1
  2. P_Agony

    P_Agony Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2008
    Messages:
    13,186
    And the nonsense continues. I'm sure Sampras, Lave, and Borg have something to say about that.
     
    #2
  3. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,048
    Laver, yes, but not the other two. They don't have career slams.
     
    #3
  4. forzamilan90

    forzamilan90 Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    5,516
    nadal will probably end up somewhere in the 14 range, and fed can really do the 20 slam thing, so yeah they will be considered the best
     
    #4
  5. Netspirit

    Netspirit Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,243
    Location:
    Snoqualmie, WA
    If Nadal can break into 14 with a Career GS and a record number of RG titles, the two will be the undisputed pair of GOATs. It won't even matter who's bigger - Saturn or Jupiter.
     
    #5
  6. John_Doe

    John_Doe Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2010
    Messages:
    171
    What kind of a question is that? The obvious answer is yes. The better question is are they considered the 2 greatest mens players of all time RIGHT NOW at this moment. Hell, even that is a stupid question.
     
    #6
  7. Mustard

    Mustard Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2009
    Messages:
    25,112
    Location:
    Cwmbran, Wales
    I think so, yes.
     
    #7
  8. kOaMaster

    kOaMaster Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2009
    Messages:
    3,026
    Location:
    Basel/Switzerland
    might be true.
     
    #8
  9. TMF

    TMF Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Messages:
    21,211
    Yes. You can compare them to the top 2 players in any past generations, they are better. They are more accomplished, more dominant, more distant themselves from the field, and they hold the key to all 4 slam events. If you combined Fed/Nadal as one player, there isn’t any weaknesses you can find. Pete/Andre, Lendl/Mac, Mac/Borg, Laver/Rosewall are also great one two punch, but they weren’t great enough to put their respective peers in place like these two.
     
    #9
  10. TMF

    TMF Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Messages:
    21,211
    Combined with 25 slams, 35 MS(Tier 1 events), 5 WTF, Olympic Medal, 365(?) weeks at #1, 7 yr end #1. They basically dominate every surfaces and condition across the globe.

    And the thing is, we don’t know what’s the final numbers be when they are finished.
     
    #10
  11. TMF

    TMF Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Messages:
    21,211
    This thread should belong in the "Former Pro Player Talk" forum.

    Hopefully the mod will move it.
     
    #11
  12. sonicare

    sonicare Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2010
    Messages:
    1,733
    Location:
    london
    I voted yes...IMO nadal ends up with 12-14 slams....even at 12, hes past sampras due to his career slam.
     
    #12
  13. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,541
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    Jupiter is clearly bigger than Saturn.
     
    #13
  14. TMF

    TMF Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Messages:
    21,211
    You are right. I think it would be better if the OP ask which era has the greatest top 2 players of all time.
     
    #14
  15. Gizo

    Gizo Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,690
    There is a good chance. At the minute I consider Federer and Laver to be the two greatest players of all-time, because both their CVs are pretty much blemishless in terms of dominance, surface versatility (as I am forever pointing out Laver regularly won the biggest hard court and indoor titles available to him), variety of big titles etc.

    Obviously if Nadal can win the Australian Open to hold all 4 slams at the same time, that would boost his standing significantly. I think he needs one more year as the undisputed best player in the world, as most of the other great players have had at least 3, but I think he will get it.

    Certainly I think there is a strong chance that that by the time Nadal retires he will be in the top 3 alongside Federer and Laver. Top 2, well that be interesting.
     
    #15
  16. NadalAgassi

    NadalAgassi Guest

    It was just a question Einstein. And if it is such nonsense why have most voted Yes so far, LOL! You sure do like to complain alot.
     
    #16
  17. Eternally_damned

    Eternally_damned Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2010
    Messages:
    650
    Depends on whether you consider saturns rings
     
    #17
  18. Mustard

    Mustard Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2009
    Messages:
    25,112
    Location:
    Cwmbran, Wales
    Still nowhere near Jupiter in size.
     
    #18
  19. vive le beau jeu !

    vive le beau jeu ! G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Messages:
    11,446
    Location:
    Ometepe, Pink Granite, Queyras, Kerguelen (...)
    in diameter, saturn's rings are easily larger than jupiter (especially if you consider the outer rings)... but you will tell me that jupiter has (discret) rings too, won't you ?... ok ok... but they're less large (and cool) than saturn's ! ;)
     
    #19
  20. urban

    urban Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2005
    Messages:
    4,369
    The ultimate test for greatness will be the test of time. On the long run, one should wait say 10-15 years after a player is retired, to evaluate his status in tennis history. For instance, in 1984 Mac had quite another status in most people's mind, than he had in 2004. The same is true for Sampras. His status has shifted quite a bit between his retirement in 2002/3 and now (its not the question if this is right or wrong). It would be good to put some distance between recent worship and a rounded evaluation. Memory will be the deciding factor. Tilden's greatness was established and stable some 50 years, after he had played.
     
    #20
  21. Totai

    Totai Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,397
    Actually..... Jupiter is about 3 times as massive as Saturn, so it does kind of matter.

    Now, Neptune and Uranus are much closer in size, so that might be a better comparison. But I doubt any one would want to be Uranus.
     
    #21

Share This Page