Federer hitting the ball better than ever? Or at least 2005/2006 level?

Discussion in 'Pro Match Results and Discussion' started by BeHappy, Jan 23, 2013.

  1. BeHappy

    BeHappy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2007
    Messages:
    4,789
    He's lost a lot of footspeed but everything is just working like clockwork. Forehand, backhand, halfvolley flick passes, effortless returns. Reminds me of Sampras in the 2002 USO final.

    A sight for sore eyes after the monotony of Djoker/Murray.
     
    #1
  2. joeri888

    joeri888 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    13,120
    yesss.. he hit 40% first serves, missed slice returns, missed easy forehands on big points all the time in 2006.

    NO.

    Fed hardly ever hits a running forehand dtl for instance anymore. Which is a crucial shot to wrongfoot any opponent. Fed plays the percentages, and plays them well, but he's way more predictable and more sloppy. Fed's serve is a bigger weapon today, but he was hitting it poorly today.

    His backhand was solid, but the slice is not knifed as much.

    Fed 2006 was just god. This guy is amazing, but not God.
     
    #2
  3. BeHappy

    BeHappy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2007
    Messages:
    4,789
    He never did hit topspin running forehands that often, it was always the squash shot. Feder has always been bad on big points, it just never mattered because he was so good. Look at his historic break point conversion rate, very low.
     
    #3
  4. TheFifthSet

    TheFifthSet Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2,422
    his forehand, movement, and return have declined among other things. the only important shot that has marginally improved is the second serve (slightly).

    i don't think his bh is better now than in 2006. Better than it was from 2008-2010, that I agree with.
     
    #4
  5. TheFifthSet

    TheFifthSet Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2,422
    Yeah I agree. His slice is still godly but it doesn't seem as good today.
     
    #5
  6. Agassifan

    Agassifan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2009
    Messages:
    2,562
    Lacks power. A Lot.
     
    #6
  7. Dagobah

    Dagobah Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2013
    Messages:
    86
    Location:
    Strong Era
    Exactly, thats why I mde this thread.
    http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=451989

    I would gladly exchange my speed for those shots, because they're playing on a slow court anyway. Federer is much better on the offence, so in my opinion he's a better player than he used to be.
     
    #7
  8. BeHappy

    BeHappy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2007
    Messages:
    4,789
    I disagree with you all when you say his forehand was bad today compared to how it used to be. He completely dominated the match with it. What are you all talking about?
     
    #8
  9. joeri888

    joeri888 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    13,120
    he barely went up the line anyway with his forehand today. He did not Always hit the squash shot. He used to really use his pace to drill a running forehand either cross court or dtl.

    Anyways, Fed and big points:

    Fed has a bp conversion of 42% over his career, compared to Nadal's and Djokovic's 45

    Fed saves 67% of bp's on his own serve. Compared to Nadal's 66 and Djokovic 65.



    I didn't say he used to be better on big points than he is now. He was about equal maybe. However, he was way better at hitting big shots when he was playing well. Today he played well, yet still gave up cheap breaks and stuff. He just missed a lot less and was NEVER EVER overpowered (except for MAYBE once against Safin).
     
    #9
  10. BeHappy

    BeHappy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2007
    Messages:
    4,789
    Well Roddick overpowered him for a set or 2 in wimbledon 2004.

    I'm not saying Federer is as good as he was because he has lost so much footspeed, just that his strokes are working absolutely beautifully like they used to. I am 100% confident Murray and Djoker won't be able to break his backhand down for example.

    I always noticed Federer using the squash shot most of the time, I really noticed it because I love big running forehands a la Sampras and Becker (and now Nadal), to me it seemed like it was the usual percentage of squash shots on the run against Tsonga but maybe you're right.
     
    #10
  11. Nathaniel_Near

    Nathaniel_Near Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    20,041
    Location:
    Relax folks, ...
    No. Good thread though. Fantastic effort and well played.

    Come ooon...
     
    #11
  12. augustobt

    augustobt Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2012
    Messages:
    2,859
    Location:
    Salvador, Bahia - Brazil
    When I see anyone comparing actual Federer (or post 2007 Federer) with his incarnation of 2006 I doubt that the person who compares has actually saw him playing back in '06 and is commenting based on google searches/wikipedia.
     
    #12
  13. TennisLovaLova

    TennisLovaLova Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2011
    Messages:
    3,075
    Obviously OP didnt watch the match at all
    Everything was a disaster in the 4th first sets.
    Serve, fh, bh, volley, net approach, everything, you name it.

    Not only did Federer use to hit better in his prime, but he did with a sick consistency. That's why peak fed is (was sadly) the GOAT...
     
    #13
  14. BeHappy

    BeHappy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2007
    Messages:
    4,789
    http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=162980&

    There I am talking about Federer in 2007 when I joined this message board.
     
    #14
  15. ark_28

    ark_28 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2010
    Messages:
    4,118
    Location:
    England/USA
    His serve could be clicking slightly better! It's a very underrated shot! He also is a great returner he did a great job today in the 5th v Tsonga!

    Last year in the Davis Cup though he was powerless against the missiles being served by John Isner as the American romped to a 4 set win! This kind of tennis has been missed at the AO this year! App out attack one two striking!
     
    #15
  16. Bad_Knee

    Bad_Knee Professional

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2012
    Messages:
    825
    All this is ever time, is *******s trying to imply Federer is playing peak like 2005, so that when he loses it's like "ZOMG no way peak Fed lost to Tsonga"...
     
    #16
  17. kOaMaster

    kOaMaster Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2009
    Messages:
    3,031
    Location:
    Basel/Switzerland
    Federer will never ever again play like he did in his prime, this is obviously clear to everyone I hope.

    What I think the main difference is, that he learned to play with a lot more brain & effectivness than with power shots. This sounds ironic since Federer isn't a ball basher, but I remember many matches in his prime where I thought he's just going for the winner because he can and probably still make the point/winning the match, not because it's the most effective shot.
    Right now I think the variety and the intelligent way to construct a point, outplay an opponent and using his whole arsenal of shots he can do makes the difference.

    A guy like Tsonga would've never troubled Federer in a GS-QF in his prime, just because he could not have outpowered Federer in the rallies the way he did today. The losses against Soderling, Berdych, Tsonga and Del Potro are the best examples for that kind of transition.

    Guys like Gonzales never stood a chance against Federer 5-10 years ago, whether their game was on or not.
     
    #17
  18. NadalAgassi

    NadalAgassi Guest

    Yes since BeHappy is a known *******. :roll:
     
    #18
  19. dysonlu

    dysonlu Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,001
    Euh, that's completely wrong. He seldom hits the squash shot and when he does, people (particularly, commentators) are usually in awe. Maybe just lately he's been hitting it more often because he's lost a step.
     
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2013
    #19
  20. corners

    corners Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    5,441
    That is a good point. I don't think he hits as many backhand winners as he used to, so in that aspect his backhand has not improved, but he committed fewer errors off that wing than Tsonga yesterday, and Tsonga was really hitting his two-hander and trying to pick on Fed's one-hander.

    On Eurosport Wilander talked quite a bit about Fed's backhand. First, he was saying he didn't understand why he was coming over it constantly instead of changing pace with the slice. Then he said he generally came over it more than before, and didn't think this was a good thing, as his slice is the best in the game. Later he mused that perhaps the reason why he's hitting fewer slices nowadays is that the forehands of today's top 10 have gotten better than what he faced back in the Roddick/Hewitt days and that these guys today can put him on the defensive by ripping forehands off the slice, and that Fed knows he can't win playing defense against the elite players.

    All good points, I thought, but I also wonder if Fed commits to coming over the backhand because he feels that he has to groove the stroke in order to stay in backhand to backhand rallies. As anyone with a OHBH knows, the slice is great, but you essentially have two backhands and so the topspin shot gets less reps and less practice than the forehand. Maybe stubbornly committing to the topspin backhand is the only way he can keep the shot tuned well enough in a match for it to stand up to pounding. He used to mess with opponents by switching from slice to topspin backhands during a rally, throwing off his opponents' rhythm. Nowadays, maybe switching back and forth throws off his own rhythm and timing. Just guessing. But anyway, yeah, I don't fear for his backhand like I used to when an opponent persists in attacking it, and he does seem to hold his own and even get the better of some two-handers in crosscourt rallies.
     
    #20
  21. PrinceMoron

    PrinceMoron Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 1, 2009
    Messages:
    3,238
    Was anyone actually there and can say what they saw rather than watching on tv?It all looks completely different live.
     
    #21
  22. joeri888

    joeri888 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    13,120
    His backhand and return were pretty good. But he was not hitting his forehand well.
     
    #22
  23. Defcon

    Defcon Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2004
    Messages:
    3,708
    No sting on his shots last night. He had to rely on placement, whereas before his groundstrokes were ultra reliable and ultra powerful.

    He's not the same player, not by a long shot.
     
    #23
  24. prosealster

    prosealster Professional

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2006
    Messages:
    968
    +1.................
     
    #24
  25. corners

    corners Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    5,441
    Ball striking against Tsonga was probably as good as ever. General power of his forehand less than peak years. Backhand holding up in crosscourt rallies better than in peak years. Slower getting to his spots so forced to play more defense than peak years. He's playing very well, but not as well as he used to. He can still bring it though and is capable of beating Murray and Djokovic in succession on these courts. Oddsmakers still have Djokovic as the heavy favorite and Murray before Fed. We shall see.
     
    #25
  26. Povl Carstensen

    Povl Carstensen Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2004
    Messages:
    5,757
    I think he is a bit better tactically, and after a few disappointing losses in 2011, he has come back mentally strong (allthough he sometimes struggles a liitle to finish off). In his prime this was more than compensated by amazing speed and shotmaking. Now he is just, what should we say, great at both. The variety and range of shots is still top top notch though.
     
    #26
  27. BeHappy

    BeHappy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2007
    Messages:
    4,789
    The courts are too slow for Federer now he's lost his footspeed in spite of how well he is hitting the ball.

    People are saying his forehand isn't a weapon, they're wrong. The court is just too slow to hit winners on against good defensive players like Murray, Djoker and Nadal . Federer can't do what Agassi did at his age and dictate play because of the speed of the court. We see on indoor that he still has the best offensive game, but an offensive game is useless on a court this slow.

    Federer's wins will only come at the WTF and Wimbledon when the roof is closed in the semi's from now on
     
    #27

Share This Page