Federer likely to play on after London 2012

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by illkhiboy, Feb 15, 2007.

  1. illkhiboy

    illkhiboy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,968
    Location:
    Karachi
    Federer in Time-Out Magazine (Dubai):
    "I have said that I would like to play until the 2012 Olympics in London when the tennis will be played at Wimbledon. However, Andre was such an inspiration in terms of how long he played. If I can remain healthy I would love to play as long as I can."

    Wow. Imagine if he even plays til' he's 33 (2014), that will likely give him the consistency of Sampras and the longetivity of Agassi-Connors. He really wants to be the GOAT.
     
    #1
  2. samej07

    samej07 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2006
    Messages:
    283
    Location:
    Texas
    they should rethink playing the olympics at wimbledon. playing it there would be totally unfair and would give anyone but switzerland no chance at olympic gold.:D
     
    #2
  3. The Grand Slam

    The Grand Slam Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,780
    Location:
    the earth..?
    Not necessarily. A lot can happen between now and 2012. Federer may not be as dominant. We'll have to wait (a long, long time) and see.
     
    #3
  4. justineheninhoogenbandfan

    justineheninhoogenbandfan Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Messages:
    898
    Plus he will be 31 by then. That is kind of old to dominant.
     
    #4
  5. The Grand Slam

    The Grand Slam Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,780
    Location:
    the earth..?
    My thoughts exactly, but hey, I can't tell the future.

    And neither can you.

    ... Or can you? <____<
     
    #5
  6. fastdunn

    fastdunn Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,294
    The most number of slam finals in history is 19 by Lendle AFAIK.
     
    #6
  7. The Gorilla

    The Gorilla Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2,495
    I think he will be like connors, he will be to old to dominate but he will definitly be a force and will win a gs every year.
     
    #7
  8. BlackSheep

    BlackSheep Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2006
    Messages:
    301
    Location:
    Chi-town
    Yea he prob will win a few more Wimbys during that time.
     
    #8
  9. illkhiboy

    illkhiboy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,968
    Location:
    Karachi
    More like Sampras then. Which I guess is likelier. He's such a genius at pulling out matches, so unless his confidence is completely shattered (unlikely scenario) I think he will be more Agassi-like i.e a contender at each Slam but often losing in the latter stages.
     
    #9
  10. TheNatural

    TheNatural Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2005
    Messages:
    7,854
    I think his physique is more suited to runing than someone like Agassi,and even sampras, so his legs arnt likely to wear out. Also hes a very very efficient mover. At 31 I think he will be moving just as well as now. Its more likely that by the time hes 35 players may be a bit better and be able to exploit his backhand more(which they should be doing more of now).
     
    #10
  11. Shabazza

    Shabazza Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    5,106
    He won't play as long as Agassi. Probably retire at the age of 32/33.
     
    #11
  12. jaap deboeck

    jaap deboeck Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2004
    Messages:
    207
    Roger has a few more years of dominance. Maybe. The short list of graphite racket male slam winners age 30 or more: Connors, Agassi, Sampras, Korda (he was later banned for substances). 6 of the last 97.
     
    #12
  13. caulcano

    caulcano Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2006
    Messages:
    1,637
    If he plays until 33 it will mean he'll be re-writing the record books every year ... because I can't see him wanting to play/compete if he's not winning.
     
    #13
  14. ATXtennisaddict

    ATXtennisaddict Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 3, 2005
    Messages:
    4,278
    The olympics will be in London. Oh wait, maybe YOU could do something about that? Write a letter in, maybe they'll change their minds. You know, switch the Olympics to the USA or something, that way it's on hard courts.

    Where else in England do you have a bunch of courts prepared for a major tennis event?

    And for the rest of you, enjoy Federer while you can. Greatness doesn't present itself just any day.
     
    #14
  15. caulcano

    caulcano Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2006
    Messages:
    1,637
    well FED will be 31(?) and if it's played at WIMB then I'm sure there's someone who can more than challenge him in 5yrs+ time ...
     
    #15
  16. whistleway

    whistleway Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2005
    Messages:
    538
    I think he handles himself very good at defeat. He would probably play for a while after he turns 30.. He just enjoys being out there and is willing to make sacrifices off the court. I do see him slowing down after his marriage, but, I don't think he will run away from tennis and hide as Sampras did. He handles pressure so well that it doesn't take toll on his emotions that much. Just enjoying and doing his job and loving to play.. It would be fascinating if he can play till 2017 or so..
     
    #16
  17. fastdunn

    fastdunn Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,294
    The extent of Federer's domination is dangerously high.

    He maintained the domination (as much as McEnroe's peak)
    for 2-3 years now.

    If he continues to dominate 2-3 more years and defeat all
    the challeges(especially from those new up and comers),
    he'll surely go dwon as the best in history...

    But it's somewhat too dangerously high domination.
    near 100 % winning all the time.
    I mean he could lose interest rather quickly if he does not win all the time any more.
    Kinda like they way Borg quit ...
     
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2007
    #17

Share This Page