Federer needs to learn a thing or two...

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by bladepdb, Apr 1, 2009.

  1. bladepdb

    bladepdb Professional

    Joined:
    May 9, 2008
    Messages:
    870
    ...from Wawrinka's backhand.

    Watching the match last night between Wawrinka and Nadal, Stan had some solid backhands. He didn't try to overdo anything, and he did just enough to keep the ball in play yet deep enough to push Nadal.

    I would argue that the Wawrinka backhand's consistency is probably in the top 3 for one-handers, up there with Gasquet and Kohlschreiber. Not saying Wawrinka's backhand is a weapon; it definitely is a great aspect of his game though since he is able to keep the ball in play till he can set up a forehand or charge into the net.
     
    #1
  2. samster

    samster Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Messages:
    5,017
    Wawrinka's backhand didn't look too hot against Roddick at the Davis Cup a few weeks ago, though...
     
    #2
  3. T1000

    T1000 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    4,342
    Location:
    Connecticut
    if fed had wawrikna's backhand from last nite he would beat rafa almost everytime
     
    #3
  4. norbac

    norbac Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2008
    Messages:
    8,487
    I'm guessing you haven't watched a lot of Wawrinka matches cause his backhand IS a weapon.
     
    #4
  5. bladepdb

    bladepdb Professional

    Joined:
    May 9, 2008
    Messages:
    870
    Well everyone has their days and their days when they aren't at 100%. But on average, Wawrinka's backhand is tremendously consistent and exactly what Federer needs against Nadal.

    (For that matter if Fed has Gasquet's backhand it would be another story; but let's be realistic...barely anyone has Gasquet's backhand, but Wawrinka's is a little more realistic to achieve).
     
    #5
  6. bladepdb

    bladepdb Professional

    Joined:
    May 9, 2008
    Messages:
    870
    Except on clay still :p


    I haven't...I was comparing it to Gasquet's though lol which is a huge leap in comparisons.
     
    #6
  7. T1000

    T1000 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    4,342
    Location:
    Connecticut
    it would definetly be more interesting and closer on clay. at FO, no chance. anyother clay courts he's got a good shot
     
    #7
  8. federerdomination

    federerdomination Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Messages:
    705
    Fed + Gasquet BH would crush anybody on tour :)
     
    #8
  9. ferocious4hand

    ferocious4hand Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    Messages:
    425
    Location:
    NorCal
    what if Stan had Fed's 4hand? possible GOAT?
     
    #9
  10. GameSampras

    GameSampras Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Messages:
    4,689
    Dont u know?

    Fed said, "he doesnt work on weaknesses."
     
    #10
  11. federerdomination

    federerdomination Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Messages:
    705
    maybe maybe not

    He might not have the mental strength
     
    #11
  12. okdude1992

    okdude1992 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    Messages:
    3,206
    yea his backhand is very good. second to only gasquet in terms of one handers. his serve was also very good last night
     
    #12
  13. okdude1992

    okdude1992 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    Messages:
    3,206
    probably, but if nadal had lopez' serve he would beat fed even with wawrinka's bh
     
    #13
  14. Mansewerz

    Mansewerz Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2007
    Messages:
    9,164
    Location:
    Caught in No Man's Land
    Wawrinka's backhand is a weapon. But his forehand killed him last night. Way too many errors.

    Does Wawrinka use an extreme grip on the bh?
     
    #14
  15. bladepdb

    bladepdb Professional

    Joined:
    May 9, 2008
    Messages:
    870
    Not GOAT by any means but definitely a potential slam or two because of his great serve.

    That's his biggest weakness, so that makes sense... :)

    It seems that way to me. He does generate a good amount of topspin off of it to keep the ball deep yet in play. I guess it's somewhere between eastern bh and extreme eastern bh, which would fit in easily with his semi-western-to-western fh grip.
     
    #15
  16. mandy01

    mandy01 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    11,518
    maybe its the grip that makes the difference.
     
    #16
  17. Josherer

    Josherer Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    1,337
    Location:
    Australia
    Waw's backhand was good against Nadal but in general it is a liability for him. He normally makes way too many errors with it. He played the match of his life against Nadal, so it appeared to be awesome even though on average it really isn't that flash.

    (BTW im not comparing it to Feds. at the moment Feds is letting him down.)
     
    #17
  18. Melissa

    Melissa Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Messages:
    190
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by GameSampras View Post
    Dont u know?

    Fed said, "he doesnt work on weaknesses."



    bladepdb's response:

    "That's his biggest weakness, so makes sense...

    Most insightful Fed comment ever!
     
    #18
  19. Josherer

    Josherer Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    1,337
    Location:
    Australia
    Can you show a link to where Federer supposedly said that. Would be interesting if true.
     
    #19
  20. Melissa

    Melissa Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Messages:
    190
    Actually it was gamesampras' post and quote.

    But I will TRY.
     
    #20
  21. Tennis_Bum

    Tennis_Bum Professional

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    997
    Pure speculation. Gasquet's topspin bh is excellent but Fed has more variety. Fed's just has a problem with Nadal's forehand to his backhand but not against anyone else. I am hoping he finds a solution but I am skeptical.
     
    #21
  22. Josherer

    Josherer Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    1,337
    Location:
    Australia
    Thanks mate.

    Still not that credible of a site. Whole interview would be nice. They could have easily have taken that out of context in order to make a catching headline.
     
    #22
  23. bladepdb

    bladepdb Professional

    Joined:
    May 9, 2008
    Messages:
    870
    Haha thanks, I was going more for an humor effect yet I guess irony is a form of humor so...

    Anyway glad you dug up the source. It's quite interesting that he would claim something like that....
     
    #23
  24. emerckx53

    emerckx53 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2005
    Messages:
    523
    Fed still has the best variety of shots off of the backhand side in tennis...and as far as I can tell there is nothing wrong with Feds game other than a little lack in confidence...if he gets it all back he will slam again
     
    #24
  25. Tennis_Bum

    Tennis_Bum Professional

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    997
    Let's hope so. But I think he has to back up the confidence thing with concrete results, like wins at masters over tough opponents, like Djoko, Nadal, and Murray, not necessarily in any order. Confidence only comes from winning tough matches, but erodes quickly with losses.
     
    #25
  26. JediMindTrick

    JediMindTrick Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,490
    That's true, it comes and goes.
     
    #26
  27. fastdunn

    fastdunn Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,294
    Back in around 2005, Robert Landsdorp pointed out that Federer's backhand has a bit too much whip than the drive. Back then, nobody questioned Federer's stroke mechanism and Landsdope's comment was largely ignored.

    The thing is that Federer's backhand worked fine for 99% of his opponent up until 2007 (exceot Nadal). It must be hard to call it an "weakness" in that situation.

    Even now, if he solves Nadal, everything will be back to normal for Federer. So my guess is that he doesn't think his backhand is a serious problem He probably consider it as part of his balanced game...
     
    #27
  28. clayrules

    clayrules Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    179
    Or three!!! Wawrinka's backhand is so much better than Federer's.
     
    #28
  29. tenniko

    tenniko Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    478
    Location:
    Irvine, CA/Seoul, Korea
    From my memories, Federer is utilizing his backhand slice less and hitting topspin backhand more. I think it works against Federer, because back when Federer dominated, he would keep hitting deep bh slices crosscourt and short ones down the line for superior defense, and use the forehand to get the job done. Nowadays he is hitting topspin bh more, and it is not that great of a shot so people like murray and djoko get to exploit it.
     
    #29
  30. tahiti

    tahiti Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2008
    Messages:
    840
    Federer needs to learn how to lose and admit that he has things to work on. Denying it is not teaching him anything.
     
    #30

Share This Page