Federer qualifying for Masters Cup.

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Matt H., Mar 21, 2004.

  1. Matt H.

    Matt H. Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,279
    with 372 points, AND holding the austrailian open title, i believe he's mathmatically qualified for the Masters Cup already. Grand Slam title holders only have to stay inside the top 20 of the champions race to qualify. However, trying to think back to last year, how many points did the #8 have?


    This is really starting to look like Agassi from 2001. Clean sweep in the spring, winning AO, IW, and Miami.
     
    #1
  2. PureCarlosMoyaDrive

    PureCarlosMoyaDrive Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,116
    Matt, it actually has to be the highest ranked grand slam winner outside the top 7 unless they are all in the top 8. Last year, the top 4 guys had won slams, so it didn't apply. Champions race last year, #8 was Nalbandian, he had like 420 or so, #9 Philippoussis had about 320 though. I think he's in the masters for sure by now.
     
    #2
  3. edge

    edge Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    543
    Funny thing, Fedexp doesn't have a coach, just brings his girlfriend and kicks everybody's butt. Agassi brings his entourage, most have a coach. Fedexp almost seems whimsical, makiing it all seem so easy.
     
    #3
  4. @wright

    @wright Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    3,567
    I think FedEx brings the magic, so the coach is unnecessary. If he wasn't bringing his girl(who I'm sure is not cheap to keep happy), he'd be keeping nearly ALL of his prize money. BTW, does anyone see not going deep at Roland Garros? He's tough to bet against right now. It almost seems like the only people who can stop Federer are God and Federer.
     
    #4
  5. Greg

    Greg Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    204
    Federer has the strength of 10 bears that have the strength of 20 bears.
     
    #5
  6. jarrett

    jarrett New User

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    77
    Dudes , chill out !!!!!!!!!!!! He is in the zone right now and this state, as magic as it is, won't last for eternity because he is a Human... and it is norma after all l!!!!! He is gonna get tired physically and mentally in the next weeks... Even though he is above everybody right now, he wil loose again a fresher player than him...
     
    #6
  7. jarrett

    jarrett New User

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    77
    Dudes , chill out !!!!!!!!!!!! He is in the zone right now and this state, as magic as it is, won't last for eternity because he is a Human... and it is normal after all l!!!!! He is gonna get tired physically and mentally in the next weeks... Even though he is above everybody right now, he wil loose against a fresher player than him...
     
    #7
  8. sliceroni

    sliceroni Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    845
    Hmm. It took Sampras 6 years to get physically and mentally tired. Federer-more talent, less effort, less stress on the body, all-court game. I'd say potentially longer than 6 years.
     
    #8
  9. Rabbit

    Rabbit G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    12,545
    Location:
    at the bottom of every hill I come to
    Federer is a throw back in more than just his game. Prior to Lendl, players didn't have coaches by and large. Connors worked with several people, but his mentor was always his mother. The whole coach thing started up toward the end of Nastase's career. He had a name for players who had coaches, I shant repeat it here. I think it's great that Federer has the wherewithall to just go out and play without minions that others bring along. He'll also net more money that way. :idea:
     
    #9
  10. edge

    edge Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    543
    Yeah, and the Dude fired IMG last year...he is a hero to all. Just traveling the world with his honey, kicking butt. He could be linvin' in a VW bus and win for all the talent that he has. Forget Roddick, he should have a reality tour.
     
    #10
  11. 10s

    10s New User

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2004
    Messages:
    18
    ^unfunny moron
     
    #11
  12. Shaolin

    Shaolin Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    4,033
    Location:
    Kansas
    Wow, and you just crack me up ALL THE TIME, 10s.
     
    #12
  13. Jonas

    Jonas Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    594
    I'm kind of with Awright on this one, as I don't see Federer doing so well in the clay court season. He may final or even win a master's series which is great, but i think the 16's will be as far as he will get. I have no logic behind what i just said. He does look about as dominant as anyone i have ever seen and has to come down sooner or later. It seems like the clay court season would be the opportune time for his fall. I will go ahead and put my early french bid on coria.
     
    #13
  14. Fee

    Fee Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    7,308
    Location:
    In front of my computer, obviously
    Federer won't win Miami, the trophy is too nice looking...
     
    #14
  15. Max G.

    Max G. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    4,355
    It would be interesting to see how long Federer stays dominant, and whether he manages to stay dominant on clay. Could, say, Coria or Ferrero take him out? Could he lose to a lower-ranked guy having a great day?

    As for six-year dominance - I don't think we can judge that yet. I don't think anyone can ever judge. How can you tell when he'll go through an erratic streak, or get injured and, or something. He's definitely on track for plenty more slams - but will it be 5 or 10? Or 15?
     
    #15
  16. Ballmachine

    Ballmachine Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    511
    Just to add my two cents, Pete had seven years of dominance. He won Wimbledon and the Masters Cup in 1999, and several titles during the summer over Andre Agassi the eventual year-end number 1 that year. Pete missed the U.S. Open because of injury, and took off about 6 months before the Masters, and still finished the year number 2. Pete owned Andre that year, and he actually beat Andre about 3 times in the summer leading up to the Open. If Pete had played the U.S. Open, or any of the tournaments leading up to the Masters, he would have finished number 1 in the world for seven straight years. The only thing that stopped him was a freak injury during practice the day before the Open started. What was most impressive though, was his ability to come back and win the masters after all that time off. Truly unbelievable.
     
    #16
  17. edge

    edge Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    543
    For all the fans who think AA was better tham Sampras...what are you thinking?!
     
    #17
  18. johnsheff

    johnsheff New User

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22
    edge, they are probably thinking 'french open,french open...' :) but that aside, it is probably fairer to be comparing fed with jmac's record from 1984 right now that with the Sampras 6 years etc etc
     
    #18
  19. Matt H.

    Matt H. Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,279
    well, Agassi had the edge over Sampras at the Australian and the French, and Sampras owned Agassi at Wimbledon and the US Open.
     
    #19
  20. SonicSpeed

    SonicSpeed Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    267
    I like Agassi better than Sampras.

    But Sampras >> Agassi

    Andre will have to win a few more majors and end a couple more years at #1 to be greater. To be comparable, he'll have to win at least 2 more majors, the French and Wimbledon, IMO.
     
    #20

Share This Page