Federer to be shocked in early rounds?

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Lleyton Hewitt, Jun 23, 2006.

  1. Lleyton Hewitt

    Lleyton Hewitt Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2005
    Messages:
    950
    I think Federer will lose in the early rounds this year....he hasnt been on the best of form on grass even though he won halle....like dropping sets....faced 4 mp!!! Though they are all tie breaks i feel big servers like Henman 2nd round or Berdych 4th round is it could really toruble federer all the way
     
    #1
  2. malakas

    malakas Banned

    Joined:
    May 27, 2006
    Messages:
    15,774
    Location:
    Greece
    Don't forget Gasquet..don't forget Gasqute..:(


    Though I think that somehow Fed will make his way through..:)
     
    #2
  3. tnig469

    tnig469 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2005
    Messages:
    457
    Fed will always find a way to make a comeback...even when he might look like he is horribly down...Gasquet might give him trouble...but Gasquet is to inconsistent at the moment to really be a FACTOR for fed....fed really does have a crappy part of the draw though
     
    #3
  4. Zeph

    Zeph Rookie

    Joined:
    May 15, 2005
    Messages:
    240
    Whether you like it or not, Fed will not lose in the early rounds.
     
    #4
  5. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    40,098
    He is human, it can happen. He might just become bored of winning everything except clay.
     
    #5
  6. ACE of Hearts

    ACE of Hearts G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2005
    Messages:
    15,715
    Fed loves this grand slam so much, just like Pete did.U gonna have to bring out the worse in him.Alot of people are taking alot of things with the Halle tournament, i see it as him being mentally drained and tired.
     
    #6
  7. simi

    simi Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,929
    Location:
    Laurentia
    Henman's a big server? First time I've heard that one.
     
    #7
  8. exruda

    exruda Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    660
    Location:
    Poland
    Well, to tell you the truth -- I'm a Fed fan and I'm not worried :)
     
    #8
  9. Breaker

    Breaker Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2005
    Messages:
    7,753
    He'll be shocked to lose more than two sets on the way to the final maybe.
     
    #9
  10. TacoBellBorderBowl1946

    TacoBellBorderBowl1946 Professional

    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,085
    He did stumble in Halle, but I don't see either Gasquet or Henman taking three sets off him.
     
    #10
  11. FREDDY

    FREDDY Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2005
    Messages:
    625
    i do want to see gasquet beat federer but, i dont think gasquet can win wimbledon.
     
    #11
  12. arosen

    arosen Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2004
    Messages:
    2,099
    One thing is for sure - Fed got himself the most difficult draw he could get. Not only he has his usual nemesis Nalby to whom he lost plenty before, he gets Gasket (lost to him once) and red hot Ancic (lost to him too before). Tough, really tough draw. Rafa got the easiest draw ever. Go figure.
     
    #12
  13. Nuke

    Nuke Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2005
    Messages:
    2,986
    Location:
    location, location, location
    He's got a rough draw, but he'll get through the early rounds. Someone's gotta be pretty hot to beat Fed, and that's less likely in a best-of-five.
     
    #13
  14. nn

    nn Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    1,957
    Location:
    Tennis World
    fed will win wim..looks like tough matchs bring best out of him..just love to see someone beat him
     
    #14
  15. federerhoogenbandfan

    federerhoogenbandfan Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,702
    Roger will win Wimbledon, and will lose no more then 2 sets total, and 1 set most in any match in doing so.

    Gasquet could not beat Roger in Halle when Roger was dead tired from the French. Gasquet stupidly has overplayed by entering a second straight event. Roger will go through him in straights, Halle is not Wimbledon.

    Henman doesnt have a prayer in hell of even taking a set off Roger. He is far from beating a top player right now in his current form. He took a set off Hewitt in Queens, big deal so did 3 others. Hewitt wasnt playing at all at Queens until the final.

    Berdych is an easy matchup for Fed. Their match at the French was a joke, and Roger himself said he should have won their final in Halle 6-0, 6-3 or something. Despite Berdych sneaking out a lucky set he was Fed`s easiest match in his weary Halle performance.

    Ancic I doubt will even make the quarters, if he does he will be lucky to get a set. Ancic has not beaten a single top player in any grand slam except Henman at 04 Wimbledon.

    Nalbandian wont make the semis. He is not good enough to be in the semis of 3 straight slams, so is due for a loss. Even if he makes it Roger has won 6 of their last 7, Nalbandian`s best chance to beat Roger is a fast hard court, it wont happen here.

    Any of Hewitt, Roddick, or Ljubicic in the final will be a huge underdog vs Roger.
     
    #15
  16. UCbearcats8

    UCbearcats8 New User

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2005
    Messages:
    26
    even if fed makes it through the first round agaisnt gasquet, i think soderling or henman could provide a very tough test
     
    #16
  17. federerhoogenbandfan

    federerhoogenbandfan Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,702
    Soderling actually has a better chance then Henman, but I expect Henman to beat Soderling. Soderling often gives Roger tough matches. Henman will lose in straight sets, gauranteed.
     
    #17
  18. Arafel

    Arafel Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,171
    A lot depends on the mental attitude his competitors have going in. Almost no one thinks they can beat Federer except for Nadal, which is why Nadal wins against him.
     
    #18
  19. exruda

    exruda Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    660
    Location:
    Poland
    RG '06 -- def Robredo (7), lost to Fed (1)
     
    #19
  20. federerhoogenbandfan

    federerhoogenbandfan Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,702
    So you consider Robredo a real top player? :rolleyes:
     
    #20
  21. exruda

    exruda Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    660
    Location:
    Poland
    Well -- he was in RG coming off a MS title in Hamburg. That's not really the bottom.
     
    #21
  22. whistleway

    whistleway Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2005
    Messages:
    537
    I can't believe people saying that meeting gasquet on the first round is not tough. This is a tough, tough draw. Luck has really been deserting roger these days.
     
    #22
  23. exruda

    exruda Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    660
    Location:
    Poland
    You really think he needs a lucky draw to win Wimbledon?
     
    #23
  24. federerhoogenbandfan

    federerhoogenbandfan Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,702
    It is a tough draw, but no draw is tough enough that there is more then a 4%chance of a player unseeded to take Roger out at Wimbledon. Anybody who thinks Gasquet has more then a 2% are dreaming.
     
    #24
  25. exruda

    exruda Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    660
    Location:
    Poland
    Where did you get that %% from? :mrgreen:
    (not that I don't agree :))
     
    #25
  26. Lleyton Hewitt

    Lleyton Hewitt Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2005
    Messages:
    950
    Henman serving at his best is a pretty big serve
     
    #26
  27. hoosierbr

    hoosierbr Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    1,833
    If Federer is going to lose at Wimby this year and I think he will it'll be before the semifinals.

    Gasquet does have a chance but as others have noted he might be a bit tired from playing this week and he's in the final tomorrow.

    I really do think Henman has more than a decent chance at beating Federer. He still has a winning record against him and he beat him at Wimby in 2001. Granted that was five years ago but a win's a win. Plus Henman has the game that can trouble Federer - if he gets to the net at every opportunity he'll have to force Roger to pass him which is his only workable gameplan. The crowd, the occasion - it could happen.

    Should Ancic make to the QF's and I think he will he too has the game that can trouble Federer and he has the advantage of youth and a bigger serve than Henman.
     
    #27
  28. HollerOne5

    HollerOne5 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Messages:
    644

    Wow guys, lets bow down to this poster because he makes the most insightful comments EVER. This is my favorite...."Nalbandian won't make the semis because he isn't good enough to make the semis of 3 straight slams." Hmm, so you are saying because he did well in January and last month, that there is no way he can do the same thing in a tournament he's been to the finals before on? You should get banned for stupidity.
     
    #28
  29. 8PAQ

    8PAQ Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    3,000
    Here is what I expect to see.

    Fed will beat Gasquet in tough 3 sets. Maybe something like 7-6 7-5 6-4. 4 sets in the worst case. Gasquet will be tired and Fed already played him on grass this month and they played for 3 sets so Fed knows all he needs to know about his grass game.

    Henman and Soderling will have a tough match. Maybe a 5 setter. I have no idea who will win. If it is Henman then most likely his back will hurt and Fed will just kick his ass in 3 easy sets. If it is Soderling then Fed will kick his ass in 3 harder sets but still most likely in straights. He played Soderling in 1st round of Hale last year and it was 3 setter so Fed knows him well on grass.

    So the draw might look bad now, and if Nadal had a draw like that then he be out in 1st round, but I think Fed can handle it with only a moderate amount of effort. Fed is still the best on grass and he can kick anybody's ass in any order. So if it was Roddick in the 1st round and Ivo Minar (Fed's favourite 1st round victim) in the final that wouldn't make much difference to the eventual outcome. :D

    So fear not Fed fans! He will win the title!
     
    #29
  30. simi

    simi Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,929
    Location:
    Laurentia
    My misunderstanding. I thought you were putting Henman into the same class as Sampras, Ivanisevic, Krajieck, Roddick, Arthurs, or even somone like Karlovic. Tim's greatest strength is his net play. At least we will be able to watch one of his matches on television, when he plays Roger on center court. I'm recording that one.
     
    #30
  31. bluescreen

    bluescreen Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,637
    8paq, i like your prediction about the gasquet match. i really dont think henman would be healthy enough (granted he wins his 1st round match) to really give fed a challenge. i think nalby and ancic will be toughest for federer, while he'll most likely get through the early rounds in straight sets.
     
    #31
  32. 8PAQ

    8PAQ Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    3,000
    I also forgot to add that Gasquet will be overwhelmed by playing in the Centre Court. This is not Hale where nobody cares. We are talking about Fed's back yard and 1st match of the tournament with everyone watching!

    On the negative side, Gasquet will be only few weeks older than Fed was when he beat Sampras in R16 of 2001 Wimby on the same court. So he better not do the same to Fed! But don't worry it is not the same. Fed knows Gasquet well and Sampras didn't know Fed well and he was 29 then and Fed is only 24 now.
     
    #32
  33. Viper

    Viper Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2005
    Messages:
    1,479
    Location:
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Nadal : Thank you Uncle Toni
     
    #33
  34. KBalla08

    KBalla08 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2006
    Messages:
    593
    i want to see it happen sometime, if not this year then maybe the next... hes gota lose on grass once, even Sampras lost at Wimbledon, or else he wouldve had 8 straight instead of 4, lose, 3...
     
    #34
  35. dubsplayer

    dubsplayer Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Messages:
    660
    He'll get tested (sometimes I even think he gets himself in jams on purpose just to make it more exciting for him) but that's about it. He'll be in the final and win it. Rafa might make it to the qtrs. He has a ridiculously easy draw, but with his grips I still can't see him making a serious run. Also, I think his won't be nearly as sure in his footing on the grass and not get to nearly as many balls as he does on the clay.
     
    #35
  36. fastdunn

    fastdunn Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,294
    It's been almost 3 years since we've been seeing Federer somehow finding
    a way to win. IMO, we'll see what he is really made of for next 1 year or so.

    I don't think there was much challenge to his domination for his 1st year
    #1(2004) but I think considerable challenges are forming now.
    If he put off those challenge for next year or so, he is probably
    truely great player, a player really special...
     
    #36
  37. jhhachamp

    jhhachamp Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2004
    Messages:
    3,166
    Dude, this was on clay, and Robredo was coming off winning a huge Master Series title in Hamburg. It could be argued that Robredo was a top 5 clay court player since all his points came on clay. Clay is Ancic's worst surface and yet he still managed to win. I am finding myself disagreeing completely with everything you write lately.
     
    #37
  38. atac

    atac Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2005
    Messages:
    391
    Hey, whats wrong with Federer getting a tough draw!? He is number 1, is he not?!!!!!! If anyone gets a tough draw it SHOULD be him!!!!!
     
    #38
  39. jackson vile

    jackson vile Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    9,819

    I don't think he has a tougher draw at all.
     
    #39
  40. Chang

    Chang Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2006
    Messages:
    389
    He's tired mentally and physically. Give the guy a break. He's not perfect. I'm sure a guy like him will learn from his mistakes in Halle.
     
    #40
  41. Chopin

    Chopin Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2004
    Messages:
    4,187
    Location:
    St. John, USVI
    I have the opposite perspective on his performance in Halle. Federer had just made it to the finals of the French Open the week before and still won the tournament. It shows how amazing on grass he is. Even Nadal physically broke down against Hewitt and had to retire at Queens Club. Even while mentally and physically tired, Federer still is unbeatable on grass.
     
    #41
  42. orangeblood

    orangeblood Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    151
    He should still win it with relative ease, but that's a considerably tougher draw than what he faced at RG IMO.
     
    #42
  43. jackson vile

    jackson vile Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    9,819

    At the same time it could be a whole heck of a lot worse.


    I guarantee that we will see some players come out and do some amazing stuff we do not expect, the US Open and W always promise that:mrgreen:
     
    #43
  44. superman1

    superman1 Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    5,241
    Henman got to the semis of Queen's by playing from the back court. If he plays from the back court against Federer, he will be destroyed in straight sets. If he serves and volleys at his absolute best against Federer, it could be a good one. Maybe he'll get a set.
     
    #44
  45. White Satin

    White Satin New User

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2004
    Messages:
    49
    Federer will come through~~First round with Gasquet should be a beautiful match, however~~They both have eye pleasing games.
     
    #45
  46. Robbie_1988

    Robbie_1988 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2005
    Messages:
    710
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    I think this is just me. But all those pictures of Federer on the ATP site news updates show a weary looking Federer. I hope he wins a 4th straight Wimbledon though.

    4 in a row would be quite something.
     
    #46
  47. Kid Carlos

    Kid Carlos Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 16, 2006
    Messages:
    634
    Its interesting how the claims are that he hasnt had a good year and is not himself on grass, yet he won Halle. Had every match go to a tie breaker and he pulled it out, All of this after playing an emotional draining and big let down in the french final. How many other players are gonna do that, none. Anyhow will Fed win wimby, i think so. In the event that he doesnt someone will have to play lights out ala Richard Krajieck against Pete Sampras 1996 wimby quarters.
     
    #47
  48. arosen

    arosen Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2004
    Messages:
    2,099
    If Fed and Nalby both go deep in the draw and play each other, Nalby would have a very, very good shot at it, provided he stays healthy. Fed has to be absolutely exhausted from the number of matches he played. He must be emotionally and physically drained. His genius will get him through anyone, but Nalby would require more than that.
     
    #48
  49. 127mph

    127mph Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    777
    why dont people realize that halle was right after he played roland garros and got to the finals that is exausting ****
     
    #49
  50. Roger is Boring

    Roger is Boring Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2005
    Messages:
    254
    i hope so!weimbeldon is so boring when he wins it all the tijme!he cant even give a good funny interview like arod does.
     
    #50

Share This Page