Federer will never win against Murray again

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by sureshs, Jan 9, 2009.

  1. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,106
    Murray has become the new Nadal for Federer. He will lose to him every time from now on.
     
    #1
  2. fastdunn

    fastdunn Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,294
    My prediction is :

    Murray will need 5 sets to beat Federer in his 1st win at a slam though (unless Federer truely declines).
     
    #2
  3. FraNkcn

    FraNkcn Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2007
    Messages:
    117
    Location:
    Seattle, Washington, USA
    USO 2008

    6-2, 7-5, 6-2 Fed > Murray, tells me otherwise.

    Again, Federer is only concentrating most on the Slams (which are the most important tournaments), as he is wanting to surpass Sampras' record. I think a lot of people have said this but he just doesn't seem to put a lot of intensity in to the smaller tournaments, but rather, looks at those as a warm up and preparation for the big ones.

    As to your claim, I guess we'll see..
     
    #3
  4. Mick

    Mick Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    8,363
    all of a sudden, the prospect of federer reclaiming the world's number 1 ranking is getting a lot tougher.
     
    #4
  5. FraNkcn

    FraNkcn Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2007
    Messages:
    117
    Location:
    Seattle, Washington, USA
    You could take that and say that, "The prospect of Nadal maintaining his World No. 1 Ranking is getting a lot tougher" as well???? ^^
     
    #5
  6. deme08

    deme08 Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,020
    No, Murray IS the NEW Federer. Let's all jump the bandwagon.
     
    #6
  7. tennisgirl90

    tennisgirl90 Guest

    Murray seems a very difficult match up for Federer, but all his losses were very tight, so I wouldn't say that. Federer won their only meeting in a Grand Slam and it's more difficult to beat Federer in a best-of-five-match. They have only played on hardcourt, so I'm very curious to see these two meeting on clay. IMO Federer is still the best claycourt-player after Nadal. I'm sure Murray will be a big contender in the future, but Federer will find a way to beat him now and then.
     
    #7
  8. Turning Pro

    Turning Pro Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Messages:
    1,430
    It was Murray's first GS Final. Look at Djokovic in U.S 07. His first then went on to destroy Fed in the AO 08. Except Djoker dosen't have enough fight and gameplan to consistently take out Fed (e.g US Open 08).
     
    #8
  9. World Beater

    World Beater Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,751
    what is this crap about federer concentrating only on the slams? it is as if federer doesn't even try for the smaller tournaments.

    federer badly wanted to win today...it was obvious...he tried his best and lost.
     
    #9
  10. zoobears

    zoobears Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2007
    Messages:
    184
    this is all bull crap. Federer is So much better than Murray. The only thing Murray is good at is playing a boring strategy against a half hearted Fed in exhibition matches and what are essentially warm up matches before grand slams.
     
    #10
  11. tennisgirl90

    tennisgirl90 Guest

    I know, but Murray hasn't proved yet he can Federer beat in a Grand Slam. I'm sure he is able to do it, but as long as he don't beat Federer in a Slam you have to be carefully with predictions like 'Federer will never beat Murray again'. Murray won four times in a row against Federer, but if he loses at the Australian Open to Federer when it really matters, that would be very embarrassing.
     
    #11
  12. Fedace

    Fedace Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2006
    Messages:
    23,292
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    you guys have any interview of federere post match??
     
    #12
  13. albino smurf

    albino smurf Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2008
    Messages:
    961
    Location:
    In a cloud of yellow fuzz
    OP: Even on grass? Doubtful.
     
    #13
  14. GameSampras

    GameSampras Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Messages:
    4,689
    Murray continues improving, I would like Murray's chances against Fed on ANY SURFACE. It would be interesting to see how Murray improved on clay and grass.

    But to say Fed didnt care about the match today is inaccurate. Fed was sitting there screaming the F words when he messed up on a few points. Thats a pretty good indication Fed wanted this match.

    Of course until Murray finally wins a slam and can take Fed down in the process during a 5 set match, Murray is still below Fed at this point. But he does have his number with the 3 set matches
     
    #14
  15. mordecai

    mordecai Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    222
    Fed took a dump on murray at the USO so I really doubt that.
     
    #15
  16. stician

    stician Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    438
    I rather see Fed win two more majors than reclaim the number one spot. He's held the #1 spot long enough. What was Sampras' ranking when he won USO for the last time?
     
    #16
  17. Mick

    Mick Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    8,363
    yep. to think about a year ago, after borg had predicted that murray could become the next number 1, a number of people in this forum said borg was out of his mind.
     
    #17
  18. zoobears

    zoobears Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2007
    Messages:
    184
    Fed was angry for his unforced errors. However it still seems to me that the result of that match never really bothered him. He was too cool in the way he calmly put those points at the net. Looks like someone in control. He has Murray in his pocket.

    But enough about murray. He is a gobshite who will always have deep rooted negative sentiments towards England. What he said before was his true reflection. What he said after was what he was trained to say to satisfy the egalitarian norms of the world we live in. Fed drops the lowest strokes to the net I have ever seen. Fed is the best technically by stats and technically by technique. Murray is a lanky choker.
     
    #18
  19. jetlee2k

    jetlee2k Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Messages:
    733
    Murray has improved alot since last year.. Federer has lost his confidence and consistency since last year.. it will be tough for Federer to get a few more slams .. I hope he will.. and I pray he will.. but it's very very tough for him now
     
    #19
  20. oneguy21

    oneguy21 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    817
    Location:
    Northern Virginia, not Virginia
    Federer is still my boy. :)
     
    #20
  21. edmondsm

    edmondsm Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2005
    Messages:
    6,902
    Location:
    In an in between place.
    If Murray was straight setting Federer then I might wonder. But Federer is still winning sets, and if you can win sets then you can win matches.
     
    #21
  22. Moose Malloy

    Moose Malloy Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2005
    Messages:
    7,889
    Out of the 14 majors Sampras won, he was only seeded #1 at 7 of them.
    I doubt Fed, Nadal, etc will remember what days/months they were ranked #1years from now. But they will likely remember what major trophies they won(though Sampras already can't remember what years he won what majors)

    Back on topic, Murray is only the 2nd player to win 3 straight matches vs Fed since 2004(Nadal being the other)

    And he's the first player to beat him 3 straight times on a hardcourt since Nalbandian in 2003. I don't think these are insignificant stats.
     
    #22
  23. tennis-hero

    tennis-hero Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,090
    Location:
    uk
    and so the bandwagon rolls into town

    just be aware, whenever the Murray bandwagons crashes, you shall jump off ship. [whats the saying about rats aboard a ship?]

    he's never won a slam, he's not invincible (like Nadal) on a single surface, his second serve is a liability (and when he gets worried and starts missing his first serve, anyone can beat him), he'll nevr dominate, and most of all... he doesn't have the magic of a true great- however, i expect him to win a few slams for sure
     
    #23
  24. robertg06

    robertg06 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Messages:
    753
    Location:
    London
    Look at Federer's elegance, look at Murray. Nothing alike. Federer plays like a champion, loses like a champion and wins like a champion. Murray wins and loses like they're the same thing. He is as charismatic as my foot, on a good day.
     
    #24
  25. fps

    fps Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Messages:
    5,432
    Location:
    Brighton, England
    people aren't saying they're *fans* of the murray ship, just that it's a good ship. when it starts sinking, people will say it's not a good ship any more. and they'll be right.
     
    #25
  26. GameSampras

    GameSampras Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Messages:
    4,689
    Maybe Fed is playing the old mind game tactic with Murray.

    Murray had the h2h on Fed before the US OPEN and look at how Fed destroyed him.

    Until Murray can prove something at the slams against Fed, I wont be totally convinced but he has a darn good chance.

    Is it me or did Fed just look like he gave up sometime in the 3rd. Talk about some pathetic tennis Fed was displaying. Or maybe he just though to himself, "Damn I cant beat this kid. No matter what I do, he comes back and gives it to me tenfold."
     
    #26
  27. World Beater

    World Beater Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,751
    sad but true

    murray is a good player...maybe even a great player but he is uninspiring
     
    #27
  28. iamke55

    iamke55 Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,084
    He should try losing the first set for a change.
     
    #28
  29. World Beater

    World Beater Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,751
    i seem to remember a similar thread was made when nalbandian was routining federer...and then boom...federer starts owning bandy.
     
    #29
  30. Lotto

    Lotto Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2007
    Messages:
    1,217
    I agree with WorldBeater. Roger always finds a way, like he did with Nalbandian although the thing about that is Murray is more consistent then Nalbandian. I have no doubt Roger will turn the H2H around though.
     
    #30
  31. norbac

    norbac Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2008
    Messages:
    8,494
    I still prefer Murray, he just feels more real to me.
     
    #31
  32. oneguy21

    oneguy21 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    817
    Location:
    Northern Virginia, not Virginia
    Agreed. Murray is an exceptional player, but his game isn't all that special. I mean how many players are out there who have a 2 hander along with a solid ground game, a good serve, and ok net play. Sounds like the majority of players doesn't it? Now compare that with Federer who has a liquid-whip forehand, a beautiful one-hander, amazing mental cool, and all court variety to bring to the court. There aren't many players out there like that and that's why he'll always be one of my favorite players. I certainly hope that although his year may not be as successful as lets say 2006, he'll be on at the right times which we'll allow him to win majors and break Pete's record. After that, he should just leave the game. It's always good to retire on a good note.
     
    #32
  33. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,106
    Consistent ugly two hander is better than erratic beautiful one hander
     
    #33
  34. zagor

    zagor Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    26,052
    Location:
    Weak era
    4 if you also include the exhibtion in Abu-Dhabi.I agree,definitely not insignificant stats.
     
    #34
  35. tacou

    tacou Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,045
    I don't get what people when they mean Fed is different in slams/only concentrating on slams. why did he enter Doha then? or Kooyong?

    if you say it's to get in match practice, well, he lost his match to murray! did he throw it or something? I think not.
     
    #35
  36. Dan007

    Dan007 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    Messages:
    1,932
    Fed needs to forget about the number rankings, he had it for very long time and he is past his prime now. He needs to focus more on slams
     
    #36
  37. Zaragoza

    Zaragoza Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    Messages:
    5,433
    Location:
    Zaragoza,Spain
    Nalbandian and Hewitt used to beat Federer when Federer had not reached his prime. Since Federer reached his prime, Nalbandian only beat Federer on indoors and Hewitt couldn't beat him.
    Murray is a totally different case. He is an upcoming player who just arrived and will probably stay in the top for many years whereas Federer will struggle to mantain his level in the next years. Their tendencies are completely opposite.
    3 consecutive wins over Federer (not counting the exo from last week) is very impressive. I think only Nadal did it against a prime Federer. Federer, like any other player, has some bad matchups and both Nadal and Murray are not only great players but also bad matchups for Federer. You have to accept that. Although on clay and grass Federer would be the clear favourite against Murray at the moment.
     
    #37
  38. World Beater

    World Beater Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,751
    well...lets not forget that nalbandian did come back and take two straight against federer in 2007 only to get owned twice in 2008. so you never know.

    also..nadal is a special player on clay...murray is good on hc but i dont know if he is revolutionary like federer or nadal.
     
    #38
  39. stician

    stician Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    438
    Those are match-ups, not stats. Yes Murray has had the edge recently but so did Canas in early '08. I agree with alot of fine points about Feds game. It's fun to watch. Murray is winning more because his fitness has improved and undoubtedly he may win a few like Hewitt did at his fitness prime. But like all retrievers, probably with the exception of Borg, they only as good as their legs.
     
    #39
  40. vtmike

    vtmike Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,658
    Location:
    Texas
    Agree +1 :)
     
    #40
  41. tacou

    tacou Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,045
    respectfully disgaree. did you see fed today?

    Murray had to run to catch him in front of the ump's chair to shake his hand, Fed didn't give him the time of day and didn't shake the chair ump's hand.

    is that how a champion loses? or did he just invest so little emotionally/physically into the match that he thought it didn't warrant the proper etiquette?
     
    #41
  42. Oui c'est moi.

    Oui c'est moi. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2008
    Messages:
    1,812
    Location:
    Liverpool, Leeds or Birmingham
    Never? We'll see.
     
    #42
  43. JankovicFan

    JankovicFan Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
    Messages:
    611
    Then again, Fed starts the season with a SF and picks up 90 points. He did better than either Nadal or Djokovic. Djoker now needs 110 points, or better than a SF at Sydney, to match Federer. Federer was not defending any points, so it's all to the good. The drama is all Djokovic at this point.
     
    #43
  44. S H O W S T O P P E R !

    S H O W S T O P P E R ! Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,938
    Location:
    In your thredz, stealin ur bukkits
    #44
  45. NGRSupaEaglez92

    NGRSupaEaglez92 New User

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2008
    Messages:
    49
    either way i think this will be one of the most entertaining years, we have seen in a while, with lots of people contending for the one ranking.
     
    #45
  46. Emelia21

    Emelia21 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Messages:
    401
    Is that why he didn't give Andy the time of day at the net?

    Roger Federer is a cool champion and a cool guy when winning, when he's up against a lets say troublesome player, Nadal and Murray, his coolness goes away and his real character shows.
     
    #46
  47. All-rounder

    All-rounder Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Messages:
    6,301
    Location:
    Transitional era
    again with this now that he has gained a advantage in H2H you assume he will be doing this in a best of 5 set hmm.... does US open final remind you of something
     
    #47
  48. SempreSami

    SempreSami Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    3,627
    Location:
    UK
    Federer was a tantrum throwing little sket before he started winning, convenient that nobody seems to know that despite the documentaries and books written about him.
     
    #48
  49. Emelia21

    Emelia21 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Messages:
    401

    Who are you asking? :-?
     
    #49
  50. All-rounder

    All-rounder Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Messages:
    6,301
    Location:
    Transitional era
    i was following off of one of gamesampras's points about murray not being able to beat federer in a best of 5 but in a best of 3 he is coming out on top
     
    #50

Share This Page