Federer's current form is irrelevant

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Defcon, Jun 7, 2008.

  1. Defcon

    Defcon Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2004
    Messages:
    3,708
    General opinion seems to be that the way fed struggled in the semi-final means he has no chance against Nadal. This is nonsense.

    1. Fed will have to play the match of his life against Nadal. You don't play that 2 matches in a row, if he had triple bagelled Mofees it would be hard to expect that form to keep up.

    2. It doesn't matter how bad/well he does against others, except for fitness, and Fed is supremely fit. You cannot prepare for Nadal! No amount of match play will help you in getting ready to face Rafa.

    Fed knows what he has to do against Nadal. At least I hope he has a gameplan, or Higueras does. One of Fed's greatest strengths is his adaptability, the ability to switch tactics. He has not done in the last 2 finals, I hope he stays focused mentally. Thats the most important thing he needs to do.
     
    #1
  2. armsty

    armsty Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,577
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    You couldn't have used one of the other 10 threads to voice your opinion?
     
    #2
  3. Rhino

    Rhino Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    Messages:
    7,494
    Location:
    South of London, west of Moscow
    I also doubt he put as much into planning to play Monfils as he has done in planning to play Nadal. He was talking about game-plans for meeting Nadal in the final after the Gonzalez match, he knew he could beat Monfils and it didn't matter if Monfils upped his game it just meant it might be a 4-setter.

    I may start a new thread for this point :)
     
    #3
  4. flyer

    flyer Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Messages:
    2,065
    Good points, some very good points, I think your right in a sense but I think in terms of confidence you always want to come in playing good tennis against the best players in the world, you want to feel like you can play at your highest level, so I think it does matter to an extent thought, form usually keeps up for a short period of time

    your right about the match of your life thing though, thats unpredictable no matter what your form is, and I think thats really the only way Federer will win, he will need to play the match of his life
     
    #4
  5. Swissv2

    Swissv2 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    2,491
    Location:
    Tennis Courts!
    Since Fed is the clear underdog in the finals...he really has nothing to lose.

    That should technically put less pressure on him - and all he has to do on Sunday is play his heart out.
     
    #5
  6. WBF

    WBF Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,970
    Location:
    Somewhere in NY

    However you want to justify it, this seems to be the case, and I can't remember the last time I saw Federer play the tennis that would earn him this champinoship. Without a miracle, he will be crushed.
     
    #6
  7. NamRanger

    NamRanger G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    13,916

    He has been playing tennis specifically geared for playing against guys like Nadal. It may have cost him a set or two along the way, but he's gotten to the final without too much trouble.


    He will be fine in the final; I highly doubt Nadal can crush Federer. It will be warmer, but nowhere near as hot or dry as the years before. The conditions are perfect for Federer; He just needs to execute his gameplan instead of trying to outmuscle Nadal from the back of the court.
     
    #7
  8. cueboyzn

    cueboyzn Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2007
    Messages:
    991
    Location:
    SA
    Monfils was just a distraction on the way to the final against Nadal. Roger probably played Monfils with half his mind on his gameplan on Sunday. Hes already shown what kind of form he can produce against Montanes Ancic and Gonzales. Especially Gonzales. Roll on the Final between the 2 heavyweights of world tennis.
     
    #8
  9. daddy

    daddy Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2007
    Messages:
    5,686
    Location:
    Moon Balls
    I think that General opinion has much more to do with the fact that he lose so many matches on clay vs this oponent. Anyways if you want to further analyse their matchup it gets worse for Federer. He managed to win 3 meetings on hard, 2 on grass and 1 on clay. But the very first time he run into the Kid from Mallorca he lost - on hard court in Miami 04. Then again was very close to losing in Miami 05 where he lost first couple of sets then to come back and win 3-2. Then he lost not only in RG but in Dubai - fastest HC thre is. Why all this talk ? Well back then he was not paying much attention to the kid, meaning he was not going to specially prepare some tacticts for the 90th ranked Spaniard in Miami. Year after you can say the same thing - Rafa was in 30 - 50th place rankingwise. Only after the RG 05 did Roger start and think what to do with him - because he had to. He was getting beat at hard and clay at that time. His tactical changes worked well preventing Rafa from owning him at faster surfaces but the only way to play against him - to attack - is not the best way to play on clay so its a two way highway. You have to go for it and attack on the surface which is slowest and unpredictable.

    Matchupwise this is Roger Federer's nightmare. He is so unlucky for this kid to have developed so fast, if Nadal was a late bloomer I feel Roger would be well and truly at 15 slams with a couple of RG titles at least.
     
    #9
  10. jrachiever

    jrachiever Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    217
    Rafa was #2 when he beat Federer in Dubai in 06'. But yes, aside from that match Federer has owned him on non-clay since then.
     
    #10
  11. PCXL-Fan

    PCXL-Fan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    Messages:
    2,872
    Location:
    Arlington, VA
    While i love Federer (not in a gay way), he doesn't own Nadal. They are usually tight and fairly competitive matches, and some like last years Wimbledon Final are monumental challenges for Federer.
     
    #11
  12. TheTruth

    TheTruth G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,671
    You're right. Current form means nothing. Roger will lift his game to play Nadal. All champions do!
     
    #12
  13. prince

    prince Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    757
    roger just neds to play consistent good tennis all match vs nadal
    their last meeting on clay he had opportunities to win but cannot sustain the level needed to beat rafa.
     
    #13
  14. cmb

    cmb Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    791
    the comment about the conditions is right on the money. I am in Paris now, and playing on some clay around the city, the sun is not out baking the dirt dry, the balls are not bouncing up too high and IT IS SLOW! Fed has a great chance if these conditions continue throughout tomorrow, its a partly cloudy forecast for tomorrow so hopefully the clouds will stay as long as possible!

    Lets have a great final!
     
    #14
  15. Zaragoza

    Zaragoza Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    Messages:
    5,433
    Location:
    Zaragoza,Spain
    Weather conditions are overrated. Nadal has played his best tennis this year in cloudy days and has beaten Federer under all possible conditions.
    On the other hand Federer has played his worst tennis at RG in the last 3 years. I think Federer was playing very well in Montecarlo and Hamburg prior to the final but he still lost to Nadal. I don´t see him playing that well now.
    On the other hand Nadal is playing his best tennis on clay this year, his backhand is being scary,the bounces are higher on this court and it´s a best of 5 which makes it even tougher to beat him.
    Anything can happen in one particular match but I can´t see any objective arguments to be optimistic about Federer´s chances.
     
    #15
  16. TheTruth

    TheTruth G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,671
    Very well put!
     
    #16
  17. NikeWilson

    NikeWilson Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2008
    Messages:
    683
    Mofils is no comparison to Nadal.
    Federer is going to get straight-setted in the Final.
     
    #17
  18. Nadal_Freak

    Nadal_Freak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,625
    Location:
    Harker Heights, Texas
    Yeah Roland Garros is the highest bouncing clay I've seen. Maybe Green Clay is higher bouncing. I've heard it was but got to see it to believe it. Vamos Rafa.
     
    #18
  19. Tempyst

    Tempyst Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    440
    To me, whether Federer wins or loses is less important than making it a good match that showcases the best of the both players. Three consecutive French Open finals is good enough for me to believe that he is GOAT.
     
    #19
  20. Philcoa

    Philcoa New User

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2008
    Messages:
    11
    Federer's a great player but apart from Nadal on clay and maybe Djokovic in recent times when everything is right for him, Federer's opposition has been really weak. The likes of Roddick (three times), Bagdhatis, Hewitt are not top drawer players and they can offer nothing but token opposition in to a true top flight player. Nadal on clay aside, in his Slam finals and earlier rounds Federer seldom had to face anyone of the caliber of McEnroe, Borg, Vilas, Connors, Lendl, Edberg, Wilander, Becker, Chang, Stich, Agassi at his best, Courier, Sampras, Bruguera, Kuerten, Courier, Kafelnikov or Rafter so he's had a really cushy ride so far. Despite his confident talk, once again I don't expect him to seriously challenge Nadal in the Roland Garros final.
     
    #20
  21. 2nd_Serve

    2nd_Serve Professional

    Joined:
    May 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,225
    Monfils took Federer to four sets because he was playing with big confidence, and really went for things. Think about it. If you won five tournaments in a row, you'd be confident with your game, and just try and go for winners right? And that confidence would keep the balls in a paint the lines. Thats why Monfils took Federer to four sets. But you know, even thought I want Federer to win, and have some reasons why I think he will win, I know, in the back of my mind, that Nadal will most likely be the winner.
     
    #21
  22. veroniquem

    veroniquem Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    31,124
    Location:
    New York
    Monfils won 5 tournaments in a row? Which ones?
     
    #22
  23. daddy

    daddy Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2007
    Messages:
    5,686
    Location:
    Moon Balls
    Cmon dont be an ass. 5 matches in a row is what he ment, and you know it.
     
    #23
  24. BkK_b0y14

    BkK_b0y14 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2007
    Messages:
    659
    Can people seriously quit comparing Fed's competition to Pete's? Sheesh.
     
    #24
  25. Nadal_Freak

    Nadal_Freak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,625
    Location:
    Harker Heights, Texas
    Pete's from USA so of course people will overrate him. If you ask my opinion, Fed is clearly better.
     
    #25

Share This Page