Federer's Nadal complex

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by JoeU, Jun 5, 2008.

  1. JoeU

    JoeU New User

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    11
    Nice Federer interview with Wilander where Federer candidly talks about
    having a Nadal complex earlier but that that is no longer
    true now. Very classy!

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZIsmSYSRq1M

    I can only hope for another great Fed-Nadal final this weekend.

    Joe
     
    #1
  2. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    34,752
    Nice to see Wilander grovel and apologize for his no-balls comment.
     
    #2
  3. Nadal_Freak

    Nadal_Freak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,625
    Location:
    Harker Heights, Texas
    He still has the complex though. See Monte Carlo and Hamburg.
     
    #3
  4. zagor

    zagor Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    25,781
    Location:
    Weak era
    Sure he does,as do most people against Nadal on clay(many have big leads and tons of BPs against him but waste them).
     
    #4
  5. flyer

    flyer Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Messages:
    2,065
    Im not sure he has a complex, I think he goes out there expecting to win, Nadal is just the better player in the end, I do not see him as "scared" though so to speak
     
    #5
  6. Defcon

    Defcon Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2004
    Messages:
    3,648
    If not for his mental blocks, Fed would have beaten Nadal twice this year. Blowing 5-1 and 4-0 leads is not exactly common for the Feds.
     
    #6
  7. flyer

    flyer Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Messages:
    2,065
    Thats a brainless comment because you could just as easily say, "If Nadal wasn't so mentally strong Federer would have beaten Nadal this year,"

    thats the problem with many peoples analysis they completely forget that there is somebody on the other side of the net, its a two way street and in this case Nadal is the better player and damn good to reel off that many strait games and still win those sets, fact is that Nadal being the better clay court player is Nadal plays his best Federer will not win, which is what happened, ts Nadal's to win or lose not Federers
     
    #7
  8. Nadal_Freak

    Nadal_Freak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,625
    Location:
    Harker Heights, Texas
    If not for his physical blocks as well. ;)
     
    #8
  9. zagor

    zagor Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    25,781
    Location:
    Weak era
    Even though I'm a big Fed fan I agree with your points here.At the end of the day Nadal is just a better claycourter(Fed beats Nadal on grass and hardcourts which wouldn't be possble if he had a huge mental block) but I still believe Fed can beat Nadal if he's inspired for that one day and plays out of this world tennis or if Nadal is somewhat off that day(maybe both will need to happen for Fed to win).But I agree,people forget that Nadal is across the net,it isn't all in Federer hands(especially on clay) no matter how great of a player he is.
     
    #9
  10. AAAA

    AAAA Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    3,389
    Last year in the French Open final Federer didn't convert even one of 13 plus breakpoints in the first set. You don't get multiple breakpoints in more than one return game if you're not doing something right. However Nadal has destroyed all his opponents so far this year. Hopefully the match with Djokovic tomorrow will be nearly or totally MAD.
     
    #10
  11. flyer

    flyer Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Messages:
    2,065
    Great points zagor, Federer can certainly win those who say he can't are out of their minds, given the right conditions and Nadal having a bad day sure Federer could step up and win, but still it depends on Nadal not playing his best tennis
     
    #11
  12. nn

    nn Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    1,952
    Location:
    Tennis World
    tough to beat someone who plays so well.. Nadal might have something similar not mentally but his game doesn't work well on grass and hard courts but he is improving so does Roger. Only thing against Roger is time on clay which is important because on grass and hard court you can still win after 30
     
    #12
  13. veroniquem

    veroniquem Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    30,958
    Location:
    New York
    Classy but so not true...
     
    #13
  14. veroniquem

    veroniquem Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    30,958
    Location:
    New York
    Nadal's game works pretty well on grass
     
    #14
  15. HappyAndFriendlyAlways

    HappyAndFriendlyAlways Banned

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    421
    Location:
    ♣ We are pure Light, pure Love, pure Divine consci
    Funny how Federer said the complex a few times, almost to see if Wilander would respond as Wilander was the one who dissed Fed about this. Fed got Wilander to say he was sorry in a round about way. It was pure genius by Fed to say that, and its good Wilander had the "balls" to say sorry.
     
    #15
  16. zagor

    zagor Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    25,781
    Location:
    Weak era
    Yeah,I'd say getting to two Wimbledon finals in a row and pushing a player of Federer's caliber to 5 sets in one of them is a pretty good result(to put it lightly).Nadal is underrated as a grasscourter in this forum IMO,especially his net skils are underrated.I don't get it how he doesn't get more praise for improving that part of his game,he has pretty good hands at the net from what I've seen.
     
    #16
  17. zagor

    zagor Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    25,781
    Location:
    Weak era
    Wilander is actually quite a big Fed fan from what I've seen,he stated several times that Federer is his favourite player and that he hopes he can win the FO.
     
    #17
  18. flyer

    flyer Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Messages:
    2,065
    perhaps that why he made the comment, out of frustration that he did not win although wilander thought he could have/ wanted him too
     
    #18
  19. zagor

    zagor Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    25,781
    Location:
    Weak era
    Yes,that is my opinion as well.IMO Wilander said that in the heat of the moment because he was so frustrated Federer lost.
     
    #19
  20. veroniquem

    veroniquem Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    30,958
    Location:
    New York
    Thank you for the acknowledgement.
     
    #20
  21. fastdunn

    fastdunn Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,294
    Roger still wants to improve his backhand against Nadal's forehand rather than find a way to avoid that match dynamics. It sounds like that to me. It's that stubborn attitude that made him such a complete player. But he seems to be also working on better tactics to change match dynamics. I think he can beat Nadal with combination of both improved backhand and some tactical changes.

    Anyway, this will be a match of huge historical proportion. Nadal's chasing Borg record while Federer's chasing career slam and big jump toward the status of GOAT in professional era...
     
    #21
  22. veroniquem

    veroniquem Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    30,958
    Location:
    New York
    Yes, if it happens, that's one for the ages.
     
    #22

Share This Page