Gamma Damp vs. Pete Damp

Discussion in 'Other Equipment' started by Gor, May 10, 2006.

  1. Gor

    Gor Guest

    Hey guys, i recently bought a gamma warm with the special gel inside of it. I have been playing with it and I think it's great. But recently a friend gave me a pack of Pete Sampras O's. I havn't have time to test it out and I have a tournament coming up. If any of you can tell me which is the better dampener, I will be very happy. Thank you
     
    #1
  2. imadeulook

    imadeulook Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2006
    Messages:
    126
    there isnt such a thing as better dampner. But if u like almost no shock go with the gamma, and if you like some shock use the pete.:mrgreen:
     
    #2
  3. str33t

    str33t Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,334
    I use the worm on my pd and it feels nice. I dont like shock that much.
     
    #3
  4. oscar_2424

    oscar_2424 Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2005
    Messages:
    7,239
    Location:
    Hallandale, Florida
    I will the Pete damp a try
     
    #4
  5. texcoug

    texcoug Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Messages:
    277
    I have tried many types of dampeners -- the stock volkl (like a worm), volkl vibra stop, prince silencer, babolat custom, babolat vibration system dampener, gamma shockbuster II, gamma no shock, luxi-worm, stock Head, Wilson W, and the Wilson O (Pete Sampras). I can say, after using all of these, that I prefer the O. I like the sound it creates (or allows for) and it tends to tighten up the middle of your stringbed (not sure how to explain this) -- moreso than the Babolat custom (also an O).
     
    #5

Share This Page