Gasquet Specs

Discussion in 'Pros' Racquets and Gear' started by Pioneer, Feb 14, 2011.

  1. Pioneer

    Pioneer Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,271
    I searched but couldn't find anything. Only that it's 27.5 in
     
    #1
  2. dgoran

    dgoran Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,947
    361gr

    32.4 cm bal

    381 sw

    LM Instinct Tour XL

    BBO
     
    #2
  3. Pioneer

    Pioneer Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,271
    you're the best
     
    #3
  4. chrischris

    chrischris Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2010
    Messages:
    2,919


    I would like to add 'Made In Austria' at the legendary Kennelbach plant.
     
    #4
  5. basso

    basso New User

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2010
    Messages:
    45
    'made in austria' does mean PT161 with pattern 16x19
     
    #5
  6. FedererBestTennis

    FedererBestTennis Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    964
    Location:
    Alpine Prostaff Crystal Mine
    I'm posting here because I don't want to make another thread, but why does Gasquet have no stencil on his racquet tonight???
     
    #6
  7. Fuji

    Fuji Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2010
    Messages:
    6,597
    He does? I just watched the match as well, and I saw it a hand full of times.

    -Fuji
     
    #7
  8. Seth

    Seth Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Messages:
    2,418
    Location:
    Sarasota, FL
    Good. Gasquet without a Tour XL would just be weird. He was such a hold-out to even get a PJ, choosing to bypass the Flexpoint graphics entirely.
     
    #8
  9. Greg Raven

    Greg Raven Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    Messages:
    618
    Location:
    Apple Valley, CA
    I grabbed one of his sticks at IWTG and it was 314 grams, 32 cm balance, 376 swingweight.
     
    #9
  10. dgoran

    dgoran Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,947
    Something seems off Did you mean 341?

    Or maybe some of the specs are strung (sw) some are unstrung (weight)?
     
    #10
  11. Greg Raven

    Greg Raven Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    Messages:
    618
    Location:
    Apple Valley, CA
    Nope, I mean 314. Strung racquet right off the machine, ready to go on court.
     
    #11
  12. dgoran

    dgoran Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,947
    Thank you Greg

    WOW that is amazing so he went drastically down in weight since the last time you took these measurements in 2009

    361gr

    32.4bal

    381 sw

    Is it still extended?
     
    #12
  13. thelastfurlong

    thelastfurlong New User

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Messages:
    44
    Wow, is that not quite light for a male pro? Very interesting...beginning of a new trend in the pro game maybe? Or just an experiment on Gasquet's part?

    Also, what would the main benefit be of the lighter weight if the sw and balance is still approximately the same?

    Thanks for the info Greg
     
    #13
  14. ART ART

    ART ART Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2004
    Messages:
    644
    This is a very dificult setup to achive.

    376-SW, with only 32cm balance point and 314 grams ... very very difficult to achive that value of 376-SW !

    What's the lenght of his racket Greg ?

    Thank's for sharing :)
     
    #14
  15. Ross K

    Ross K Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2006
    Messages:
    8,232
    Just... wo!:shock:


    R.
     
    #15
  16. ART ART

    ART ART Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2004
    Messages:
    644
    Sorry? (ten ...)
     
    #16
  17. [d]ragon

    [d]ragon Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    2,466
    That's one insane spec but it does sound fun to hit with. The lighter weight and HL balance should make the high swingweight manageable plus it would probably be very stable and monstrous when striking the ball
     
    #17
  18. dgoran

    dgoran Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,947
    This is what I was thinking To get that high of a swing weight his racket is probably pro stock "pt-161" around 250-260 gr stock with 30sw. and they add lead to 12 and about 1inch from the end.
     
    #18
  19. kiteboard

    kiteboard Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    Messages:
    3,907
    Location:
    Oakland
    That's a ton of lead at 12 under the capped grommet.
     
    #19
  20. kiteboard

    kiteboard Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    Messages:
    3,907
    Location:
    Oakland
    How can anyone hit a 103mph bh, with 314g?
     
    #20
  21. Don't Let It Bounce

    Don't Let It Bounce Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,622
    They can't. But they can knock the hell out of one with a 376 SW! (While that's happening, the 314 is standing at the service line, facing Gasquet with its little hands up, begging him not to go to the net lest his racquet explode into high-modulus shrapnel.)

    I've never heard of such a spec, but it has interesting implications and sounds great for a baseliner. I guess the wizards in Kennelbach got two lumps of lead, connected them with a force field, and painted the whole thing yellow and black.

    I bet I'm not the only one here thinking about trying this with an old ultralight racquet...
     
    #21
  22. kiteboard

    kiteboard Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    Messages:
    3,907
    Location:
    Oakland
    That's sort of a crazy spec. No way he can volley with that lump of lead at top. How can he serve?
     
    #22
  23. PED

    PED Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2007
    Messages:
    5,339
    I'm assuming that Gasquet is still using an XL stick.

    If so, part of that 376 SW is coming from the extra length.
     
    #23
  24. travlerajm

    travlerajm Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Messages:
    4,438
    I've used racquets with specs like that. Very polarized and very, very spin friendly.

    But comes around a bit too slow on forehands for my taste.
     
    #24
  25. baseline_monster

    baseline_monster Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2010
    Messages:
    1,142
    He can hit such a hard ball with such a "light" stick through perfect technique, hence why he is a top pro and we look at rackets and try and make excuses for why we cant.
     
    #25
  26. 0d1n

    0d1n Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    3,724
    Location:
    Cluj-Napoca, Romania
    Dropping 50 grams from his racquet mass sounds ... highly improbable to me...but I guess it is possible.
    Perhaps he's going through an experimentation phase, perhaps something related to injury...who knows.
    Regardless, I've seen futures players (top 4-500 ATP) playing stock radicals (which are light in mass AND swing weight) so nothing should really surprise me anymore.
     
    #26
  27. dgoran

    dgoran Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,947
    They hit the center of the sweet spot with such consistency that is does not matter if it is 300 or 350. I think it matter on off center hits but they do not make that mistake that often.
     
    #27
  28. Cup8489

    Cup8489 Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    9,267
    Location:
    Silvis, IL
    Stock radicals eh? I suppose I can understand it to an extent, but i find the Radicals, in particular the MG radical, get pushed around pretty easily if you get handcuffed or are late to the ball.. But then those futures players probably are rarely mistiming!

    Still, I was discouraged from beefing up the SW on a light racquet by those who claimed a lack of stability would result; guess they were not totally correct.
     
    #28
  29. Don't Let It Bounce

    Don't Let It Bounce Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,622
    For those who find the numbers interesting...

    The average polarization index (recoil wt/mass) for the 1200+ stock frames on the spreadsheet in front of me is 0.464, and almost everything falls within a few percentage points of that average. This Gasquet spec rolls in at an astounding 0.67.

    Wilmot McCutcheon has an overall spec he calls "Quality Index" (mr^2/I), for optimizing performance and safety. Lower is better, <1.10 is what he believes a good racquet ought to have, and his top-ranked racquet is the Prince Graphite Classic at 0.99. The Gasquet spec is 0.91.
     
    #29
  30. SlowButSure

    SlowButSure New User

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2011
    Messages:
    40
    Not wanting to question Greg's measurements, but those numbers are very strange.

    Just doing the math, in order to get those stats the density of the material in the throat of the racquet would have to be well below any current racquet.

    Just picking some really light, relatively high SW racquets, Gasquet's racquet would have to have at least 1/4 less weight in the throat than any of them. More telling, this racquet would have to have only 20-25% as much weight in the throat as many popular 'players' racquets (including APD, Prestige, 6.1 line). To have anywhere near the same playing characteristics, with 1/4 to 1/5 the weight in the throat, would be a major endeavor.

    That would mean it's not only a special mold, but a completely different composition and layup.

    It's the combination of the low weight and the balance that makes the numbers really hard to imagine. If either of these were different, it becomes a lot easier.

    Again, not questioning Greg's measurements, but maybe the machine was off.
     
    #30
  31. li0scc0

    li0scc0 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    2,173
    He always used a 27.5...wonder if it is now 28"?
     
    #31
  32. tenis1

    tenis1 Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2011
    Messages:
    848
    I agree that 314g, 32 cm balance and 376 sw seems strange.
     
    #32
  33. PurePrestige

    PurePrestige Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2004
    Messages:
    516
    Hey Greg, would you be willing to speculate for us how they managed to drop around 45 grams from his old setup that you provided us with?
    I'm really interested in how this might have been done, both Gasquet and Djokovic seem to be playing with racquets that cannot be replicated using any stock racquet.

    Gasquet had specs at 361grams, 32.4cm, and 381swingweight for 2009 BNP. How did Head manage to get him down to 314grams, 32cm and 376 swingweight?
    He dropped 47grams off his racket, but ended up with a more headlight balance at 32cm and only dropping 5 points of swingweight.
    It'd be really interesting to see the platform frame they came up with, Gasquet seems to still be using the Liquidmetal Instinct XL frame shape @ 27.5in. and 100sq in.

    This may be a new direction for racquet customizing, I'd like to see how the swingweight and balance were kept so high in the process. Djokovic specs seem interesting as well, given his specs and the stock specs of the Head Youtek/IG Speeds it wouldn't really be possibly to weight a racket up the same way without going much higher in static weight.
     
    #33
  34. Timbo's hopeless slice

    Timbo's hopeless slice Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    4,097
    pay attention, it's a force field!!
     
    #34
  35. christo

    christo Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    1,821
    So let me get this straight, light in the throat but leaded at 12 o'clock
    and leaded at the butt with a leather grip and overgrip. I still can't fathom SW of 370'ish with an overall weight of 314. It doesn't seem logical, Captain :shock:
     
    #35
  36. Timbo's hopeless slice

    Timbo's hopeless slice Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    4,097
    it's a racquet, christo, but not as we know it...
     
    #36

Share This Page