Goodbye, Maryland tennis

Discussion in 'College Tennis Talk' started by wanatabe mixer, Nov 29, 2011.

  1. TimothyO

    TimothyO Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2010
    Messages:
    3,644
    Location:
    Baseline
    http://sportsologist.com/college-athletics-by-the-number/

    For the record nearly half of men's football and basketball programs are money losers. Even then the accounting is sketchy and it's quite likely an even smaller percentage break even.

    I went to Notre Dame and contrary to its reputation of developing true "student athletes" it's as corrupt as any other program. Football players have access to "special study sessions" where answers to tests were handed out. They can also attend special summer classes where three semesters of credit are awarded for a few weeks of class.

    Picking on title IX is like complaining about jay walking tickets in Detroit...just plain idiotic.
     
  2. NLBwell

    NLBwell Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    Messages:
    7,456
    Unless you were the one who got a jaywalking ticket.
     
  3. sundaypunch

    sundaypunch Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    1,809
    That's a bad analogy. Anyone would be happy to get out of Detroit with only a jaywalking ticket.
     
    Beowulf likes this.
  4. Dream_On

    Dream_On Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2009
    Messages:
    345
    How on earth does anyone think title IX is fair?

    Its changing sex discrimination in every sport into sex discrimination the other way in certain sports.
     
  5. ClarkC

    ClarkC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2008
    Messages:
    3,854
    Location:
    Charlottesville, VA
    I was referring to Division I teams, which is the main focus of Title IX discussions. Adding up Divisions I, II, and III (which has never even had scholarships) is not relevant to a Title IX discussion.
     
  6. ClarkC

    ClarkC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2008
    Messages:
    3,854
    Location:
    Charlottesville, VA
    Actually, I did not call you a propagandist. I implied that the NCAA stats that you linked to were propaganda, and called the NCAA propagandists on this issue. That implies that you are being misled by propaganda, which is not the same as intentionally being a propagandist.
     
  7. Kirijax

    Kirijax Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2012
    Messages:
    1,848
    This needs to be a bumper sticker! :)
     
  8. gully

    gully Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    806
    Oh, you were referring to D1 teams. Well, then, I think after this series of posts you have finally said what you meant: that there are a handful fewer men's D1 tennis teams today than there were three decades ago. Eight fewer, to be exact.

    But then again, to use data from the NCAA (instead of makingitup, nothavingany) is to, as you say, to be misled by propagandists. (Where is the data going to come from, anyway? Are you going to count teams? Am I? You can't seriously mean that to use any data from the NCAA in discussion of intercollegiate athletics is to be "misled.")

    Like I had said on p. 1 of this thread, the causes for Maryland losing its men team are many--a perfect storm, almost, of overextending scant resources, diminishing funding sources, and lack of success.
     
  9. sundaypunch

    sundaypunch Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    1,809
    This is exactly why the statement is faulty reasoning. The number of teams fluctuates yearly. To have a few % less now than in 1981 is insignificant. It's easy to spout off about how Title 9 has decimated men's tennis, but the facts don't agree.
     
  10. TennisNinja

    TennisNinja Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,522
    Location:
    Someplace, Somewhere
    The idea behind Title 9 is a good one. The actual implementation, however.... not so much. Title 9 should allocate equal scholarships across the same sport, not as a total men get _# and so do the women.
     
  11. floridatennisdude

    floridatennisdude Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,013
    I like this in theory, but it would be an "all or nothing" choice for every school.

    I have a far fetched theory of my own that gets into requiring a certain number of total teams to be classified as D1 and a higher number for your school to be BCS eligible. I'm sure it would get shredded in an online forum.
     
  12. sundaypunch

    sundaypunch Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    1,809
    Just what women need - 85 scholarships for football.
     
  13. Misterbill

    Misterbill Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Messages:
    671
    NCAA currently requires D1 schools to have 7 sports for men and women each, or 6 for men and 8 for women, with at least two sports that have both men's and women's teams. (Too lazy to look up the cite right now).

    And the BCS will be gone after 2013.
     
  14. tennis_ocd

    tennis_ocd Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2,625
    Easy if one believes that women should be denied equal benefit of federally subsidized education.
     
  15. floridatennisdude

    floridatennisdude Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,013
    Interesting theory on the BCS...seeing as it starts the 4 team playoff in 2014 and has a 12 year TV deal.

    My theory is that if a school wants to be BCS eligible in football, they need to sponsor and fund 19 sports (football plus 9 men, 9 women)

    If a non football school wants to be NCAA eligible in men's basketball, they need to sponsor and fund 18 sports (9 men 9 women)

    Caveat being that I you offer the female sport, you must sponsor the male equivalent before adding another female sport.

    A sports scholarship funding needs to be the amount of starters required plus 10%.

    I know, lots of loopholes. The theory is to let football be the cash cow without reverse discriminating against males.
     
  16. Misterbill

    Misterbill Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Messages:
    671
    I really think the BCS is dead after the 2013 season. Here are just a few of many links out there.

    http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/blog/dennis-dodd/19383956/say-goodbye-to-the-bcs-at-least-the-name

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/26/college-football-playoffs_n_1628960.html

    http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2012/11/12/3634896/college-football-playoffs-bowls-system-big-east

    Under the soon to be defunct BCS, teams were (are) chosen to play for the national championship through a formula involving two human polls and a bunch of computers. Under the new system, a committee will decide on four teams to participate in a playoff.

    Under the soon to be defunct BCS, six conferences had Automatic Qualifying spots to so-called BCS bowl games. Lots of people referred to these conferences as "BCS conferences". Now there will be five "AQs" and non-AQs will have a more direct path to the big bowls.

    I'm standing by my point that the BCS is dead after next year, despite your snark.

    Maybe you meant to refer to AQ instead of BCS? But then again, after the BCS is dead post-2013 season, all D-1 football programs in at least 10 conferences will have a shot at the championship playoff.

    Even if that is what you meant, "D-1" is an NCAA term and classification and "AQ" is not. Maybe NCAA would incorporate "BCS" or "AQ" into its rules, or the college football playoff executives would dictate how many sports teams a school would need to have to qualify for a football bowl game, but I really don't think that would be realistic.

    Bottom line, at least I agree with the second part of your original point below:

    I have a far fetched theory of my own that gets into requiring a certain number of total teams to be classified as D1 and a higher number for your school to be BCS eligible. I'm sure it would get shredded in an online forum.
     
    Last edited: Nov 26, 2012
  17. floridatennisdude

    floridatennisdude Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,013
    Glad to be your fodder. Interesting analysis on what you see as BCS. I guess the term is so loosely used it gets interpreted differently based on circumstance.
     
  18. Misterbill

    Misterbill Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Messages:
    671
    Fodder?

    OK, the heck with my analysis. Just post up your analysis or anything that would indicate the BCS will continue after the 2013 season.

    I don't think the term "BCS" is used loosely, and I haven't come across anyone before today who thinks it hasn't been consigned to the trash bin of history, post-2013 season.

    Back to the point, the old BCS was created by the D1 college presidents and their Conference Athletic Commissioners. The new system that will replace the BCS, similarly, was created by the college presidents/conference commissioners. NCAA has nothing to do with either. NCAA does not/will not crown a college football champion.

    I think it is a long shot that the Conference Commissioners would agree that each D-1 school has to have 18 sports in addition to football......more than the NCAA requires for D1 status...... in order for a school to qualify for a major bowl game. U Florida doesn't have 18 sports. Alabama?

    But sometimes long shots come in. Interesting debate.
     
    Last edited: Nov 26, 2012
  19. floridatennisdude

    floridatennisdude Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,013
    ^^^Florida is precisely my point. 100 million budget and 17 sports. We should have men's soccer here. Or men's gymnastics. Something.

    I'll decline further explaining. Seems you have your mind set. Not like my random idea is ever going to fly. Ultimately, I think it's crap that more boys play sports and have less chance of playing in college (unless they play football).
     
  20. Dream_On

    Dream_On Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2009
    Messages:
    345
    But then male tennis players are not the equal of women tennis players..

    The only fair way about it would be give equal scholarships for tennis in both mens and womens because as I said that if you cant see that its just turning sex discrimination in all sports to sex discrimination is some sports then you are blind. All it would take would be to take away 2 scholarships for womens tennis (Why on earth do they need to give full rides to players who dont even start) and add 1.5 to mens tennis while taking a whopping 3.5 scholarships from football or basketball to make it even.
     
    Last edited: Nov 29, 2012
  21. goran_ace

    goran_ace Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2009
    Messages:
    2,963
    Location:
    At Large
    Usually the athletic department will honor their scholarships for their remaining years if they wish to stay at the school and graduate. Not everyone can/will transfer. I'm sure their coach will have no problem finding a new gig.
     
  22. tennis_ocd

    tennis_ocd Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2,625
    Or give 42.5 full scholarships to women for football to really make things fair. :twisted:

    Point is, it'd be a stretch to argue that the law should provide gender neutral guarantees for specific sport participation. Not so much gender neutral participation in federal funding for education opportunities.
     
  23. Clemson_tennis

    Clemson_tennis Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    5,730
    Location:
    Cedar City Utah
    I kinda miss the Terps. They were a feisty team that was better indoor. Kinda like Louisville.
     
  24. PhotoBlue

    PhotoBlue Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2011
    Messages:
    1,394
    Location:
    The tennis court
    I've seen Louisville play... They have a DEEP team, or did anyway.
     
  25. Clemson_tennis

    Clemson_tennis Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    5,730
    Location:
    Cedar City Utah
    They would be joining the Big ten next year
     
  26. Clemson_tennis

    Clemson_tennis Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    5,730
    Location:
    Cedar City Utah
    just noticed that Kyle Spencer, the former head coach at Maryland is now the assistant coach at SMU. That's a pretty big step down. I feel like he deserves a better job than that based on his success in the last two years at Maryland.
     
  27. Clemson_tennis

    Clemson_tennis Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    5,730
    Location:
    Cedar City Utah
    Take a look at Texas-Arlington's schedule. Looks like they revived the Maryland tennis program just to play UTA on March 17th
     
  28. TopDawg

    TopDawg Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2010
    Messages:
    9,987
    Location:
    Chesterfield, MO
    That is funny

    [​IMG]
     
    andfor and DUROC like this.
  29. andfor

    andfor Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2004
    Messages:
    5,094
    Go Twerps!!! HAHA
     
  30. beltsman

    beltsman Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2013
    Messages:
    3,046
    Location:
    Strong era
    Boy I'm sure glad we have Title IX /sarcasm
     
    andfor likes this.

Share This Page