Grand Slams Career Win-Loss In Open Era

[5555]

1. Bjorn Borg .898
2. Rafael Nadal .876
3. Roger Federer .869
4. Rod Laver .857
5. Pete Sampras .842
6. Novak Djokovic .830
7. Ken Rosewall .829
8. Jimmy Connors .826
9. Ivan Lendl .819
10. John McEnroe .815
11. John Newcombe .814
12. Andre Agassi .809
13. Boris Becker .803
14. Mats Wilander .796
15. Stefan Edberg .791

Link http://www.atpworldtour.com/Reliability-Zone/Reliability-Gland-Slams-Career-List.aspx

 

[The Bawss]

Cool story, bro.

 

[CocaCola]

Sure, he's among the best in many categories. Another legend in progress.

 

[Talker]

Interesting that the top two started winning early in their careers.
It took Djokovic awhile to get going.
Fed also started out slowly by losing in the early rounds for a few years IIRC.

I'd like to see those percentages since their first slam.

 

[tennis_pro]

Interesting that the top two started winning early in their careers.
It took Djokovic awhile to get going.
Fed also started out slowly by losing in the early rounds for a few years IIRC.

I'd like to see those percentages since their first slam.

Fed since Wimbledon 2003 is at 203-19 which makes it a 91,5 % winning ratio. Some of the earlier losses were understandable but a 21-year old Fed went 6-4 in major matches in 2002 (lost in the 1st round at the FO and Wimbledon + 4th round at both AO and US) - that's surprising.

 

[Talker]

Fed since Wimbledon 2003 is at 203-19 which makes it a 91,5 % winning ratio. Some of the earlier losses were understandable but a 21-year old Fed went 6-4 in major matches in 2002 (lost in the 1st round at the FO and Wimbledon + 4th round at both AO and US) - that's surprising.

Thanks tennis_pro.

That is surprising.

It took Fed awhile to control his self in those years, too bad because he was probably good enough a year or two before his first slam.
The result is losing maybe one or more slams when young.