Greatest Canadian player ever

Discussion in 'Former Pro Player Talk' started by Dan Lobb, Oct 20, 2012.

  1. Dan L

    Dan L Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,087
    Also, Ulf Schmidt and Orlando Sirola.
     
  2. Dan L

    Dan L Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,087
    Bedard's victory list includes twelve (12) international tournaments, and

    wins over the following distinguished players, all of whom were in mature form:

    1) Sven Davidson

    2) Nicola Pietrangeli

    3) Orlando Sirola

    4) Ulf Schmidt

    5) Dick Savitt

    6) Roy Emerson

    7) Bob Howe (winner over Hoad in 1956, over Laver in 1957)

    eight) Alan Mills (winner over Laver at the London Hardcourt in 1961)

    9) Ramanathan Krishnan (runner-up to Hoad at Nottingham in 1957, winner over Gimeno, Emerson at Wimbledon, over Laver in Davis Cup)

    10) Whitney Reed

    11) Eugene Scott

    12) Jackie Brichant

    13) Rafael Osuna

    14) Kurt Nielsen

    15) Torben Ulrich

    16) John Bartlett
     
    Last edited: Jul 8, 2014
  3. Dan L

    Dan L Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,087
    Bedard's wins over Eugene Scott occurred in the 1958 U.S. National at Forest Hills, and in a memorable final to the

    1960 Eastern Claycourt Championship

    final Bedard df. Eugene Scott 1-6, 14-12, 2-6, 6-4, 6-2

    Great stamina for a 29 year old part-time player, against a 23 year old player.

    Eugene Scott was ranked #4 in the U.S. in 1964, and reached the semifinals at Forest Hills in 1967, at age 30.
     
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2014
  4. conway

    conway Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2014
    Messages:
    721
    I would say Daniel Nestor for now. Yeah doubles doesn't come close to singles but he has achieved so much and the singles players so little (relatively speaking) I still give him the edge for now. If Bouchard, or even Raonic, wins a slam, I give them the edge on him immediately at that moment.

    Just singles players Bouchard is already now the best and Raonic 2nd best right now. Bassett now done to third.
     
  5. Dan L

    Dan L Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,087
    How many Canadian tennis players have won twelve (12) international tennis tournaments in singles play?
     
  6. conway

    conway Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2014
    Messages:
    721
    Back then everyone played and won many more tournaments. Navratilova, Evert, and Court all won 155+ tournaments, and you will never see that sort of thing again. I look at performance in the biggest tournaments as the best indicator.
     
  7. Dan L

    Dan L Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,087
    No, Raonic and Posposil play MANY more singles tournaments today than any Canadian player did in the past.

    I will admit that there are more tough players in most tournament fields today, although the list above of 16 outstanding players whom Bedard defeated would fit into any tournament today.

    In all of Bedard's tournament wins, and in many of his tournament losses, he defeated a tough player or two.

    Again, how many Canadian tennis players have won twelve (12) international singles titles?
     
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2014
  8. BobbyOne

    BobbyOne Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    7,773
    Dan, John Bartlett a tough player?
     
  9. Dan L

    Dan L Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,087
    ..................................
     
    Last edited: Sep 1, 2014
  10. BobbyOne

    BobbyOne Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    7,773
    Dan, Bartlett was NOT a world top ten player; rather top 72 or 86.

    What do you smoke???
     
  11. newmark401

    newmark401 Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    1,058
  12. Dan L

    Dan L Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,087
    His Wikipedia page states that he was an Australian Davis Cup team member AND TOP TEN PLAYER IN THE OPEN ERA.

    Also, he had wins over many top players, including Arthur Ashe.

    Does that sound good?
     
  13. BobbyOne

    BobbyOne Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    7,773
    No, Dan, it sounds stupid. Bartlett did not play in Davis Cup as far as I know. He only won in 1972 an Australian Davis Cup squad tournament.

    Bartlett was of course NOT a World top ten player as you claimed! And I strongly doubt that he was at least a top ten player of Australia in any year.

    Conclusio: Trust rather me than wikpedia...

    As I said, Bartlett was about No.70 or 80, not a top tenner!

    Awake!
     
    Last edited: Aug 22, 2014
  14. Dan L

    Dan L Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,087
    Hey, chill out, buddy.

    I was merely quoting from Wikipedia.

    Perhaps they meant top ten in Australia.

    Could a nobody beat Arthur Ashe?

    Think about it.
     
  15. BobbyOne

    BobbyOne Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    7,773
    Dan, Be cautious when quoting wikipedia. On the Bartlett site there is a warning and request for improvement and verification of that absurd claim!

    I went through the yearbooks: Bartlett was never a top ten player in Australia.

    Your original claim was that he was a WORLD TOP TEN PLAYER. You could regret your wrong claim but as a fundamentalist...

    Almost every journeyman or nobody can beat once or twice a great player. Rosewall f.i. lost to Bob Perry and to Paul Kronk.
     
  16. Dan L

    Dan L Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,087
    Sure, if the Wiki is wrong, I accept that.

    I have edited the claim to refer only to the Wiki page.

    But it is not easy to beat Ashe.

    I am not sure WHERE or WHEN he would beat Ashe.

    I see that Bartlett was about 19 years old when Bedard defeated him.
     
    Last edited: Aug 23, 2014
  17. BobbyOne

    BobbyOne Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    7,773
    Dan, Thanks. Bartlett beat Ashe in the first round of the 1973 Louisville tournament. He lost in second round to Dick Dell.
     
  18. Dan L

    Dan L Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,087
    Dell was a decent player, winning at least two tournaments.

    Bartlett won the Japanese Indoor in 1969, as well as beating Ashe.
     
    Last edited: Aug 24, 2014
  19. Dan L

    Dan L Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,087
    Bartlett was 21 years old in 1969 when he won the Japanese Indoor, and 25 years old when he beat Ashe.

    Bedard beat him at the 1967 London Hardcourt by scores of 6-4, 6-1, 9-7, not a bad outing for a 36-year-old part-time player.

    An age difference of 17 years.
     
    Last edited: Aug 24, 2014
  20. BobbyOne

    BobbyOne Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    7,773
    Dan, I must disappoint you: the Japan Indoors in 1969 was a very weak tournament. Bartlett maybe the only foreign player.

    In 1967 Bartlett was very young and immature.
     
  21. Dan L

    Dan L Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,087
    And Bedard was 36 years old, and a full time secondary school principal at a private collegiate.
     
  22. Ironwood

    Ironwood Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2009
    Messages:
    688
    Location:
    North of the 49th!
    I'm pretty sure I saw both in earlier rounds that year, but wasn't there for the final. They were both at the top of their game. Newcombe is legend, but I especially remember Okker. He was the first of the heavy top spinners.
     
  23. Dan L

    Dan L Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,087
    Shortly after this tournament, Bedard extended Roger Taylor in Davis Cup play to 7-5 in the fifth set, before visibly tiring.
     
  24. Dan L

    Dan L Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,087
    Here is an update on Peliwo,

    http://www.theglobeand mail.com/sports/more-sports/on-the-road-with-canadas-next-hope-for-tennis-superstardom/article19839799/
     
  25. Dan L

    Dan L Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,087
  26. kiki

    kiki Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    18,714
    I know and seen Kronk ( he also beat Clerc at Wimbledon, a lousy player but had a very good serve), but TBH never heard of another Perry other than Fred
    Who the hell is this Bob Perry? where does he come from?
     
  27. Dan L

    Dan L Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,087
    These losses by Rosewall were very late in his career.

    Bartlett should be respected, for how many players could beat Ashe in his prime, as Bartlett did? Not too many.
     
  28. Oz_Rocket

    Oz_Rocket Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    666
    Location:
    The Land Down Under
    Bit of a bump for this thread.

    Today I had the absolute pleasure of chatting with Lorne Main at an ITF Seniors event here in Australia. What a wonderful and humble gentleman!

    And while I had heard his name before, it wasn't until afterwards when someone mentioned his multiple world championships that I realised how dominant he has been.

    Definitely someone Canadians should be very proud to call their own.
     
  29. Dan L

    Dan L Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,087
    Yes, he won the Monte Carlo tournament in 1954, and several world senior titles.
     
  30. encylopedia

    encylopedia Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2014
    Messages:
    656
    No. Not at all. Besides being one of the least liked players on the tour (among the pros), he was greatly disliked by Canadian tennis fans.

    The guy actually played on junior teams for Canada (though like most teens went off to train outside of Canada), and gladly took support from Canadian development programs.

    As soon as he was on the way up the ranks, he NEGOTIATED with Tennis Canada and the British federation - they, being desperate for a Wimbledon champ, gave him a much better deal. In the blink of an eye, he waved the union jack around, gained a faux-british accent (which even the young-punk-Agassi made fun of: funny watching Rusedski trying to speak with a British accent...), and just sincerely "felt" more British....

    Prominent Canadian tennis luminaries like Grant Connell, and Pierre Lamarche spoke publicly of their distaste for Greg and his distinctly mercenary move.

    He returned to the Canadian Open soon after to have his every move booed. Fans cheered on Rusedski's faults and unforced errors for American Michael Joyce.

    Though time may have dampened the initial heat Rusedski had, he was never referred to commonly as Canadian again, nor was he embraced in Canada.

    He made his choice - Canadians didn't want him back.
     
  31. encylopedia

    encylopedia Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2014
    Messages:
    656

    Correct. Though he proclaimed he "felt" more British (after negotiating with both federations), and claimed his British girlfriend Lucy was also a reason....
     
  32. encylopedia

    encylopedia Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2014
    Messages:
    656

    ROFL!!! Nestor fanboy alert!!! There are only 6 in the world, so this is a rare moment..... ;-)


    No seriously, I think as you learn more about tennis, you'll realize that - like it or not - doubles has very little value in terms of tennis greatness when compared to singles. This is why Flemming, Flach, Seguso, Leach, Pugh, The Bryans....are NOT seen as greater than Ashe, Chang, Roddick, etc.

    Well....even the general public would not have that impression, since most would never have even heard of any of the doubles players...
     
  33. insiderman

    insiderman Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2007
    Messages:
    356
    Location:
    in a house
    Wayne Gretzky! The Guy can actually play a 'mean' game of tennis! Google it~!
     
  34. Ramon

    Ramon Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2011
    Messages:
    3,575
    Location:
    Florida
    I would already put Bouchard ahead of those 2. Bassett was interesting and certainly had a lot of attention but in the end was just a flash in the pan.

    Raonic has potential. Maybe he needs to mess up his hair a bit! :)
     
  35. Ironwood

    Ironwood Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2009
    Messages:
    688
    Location:
    North of the 49th!
    If Raonic or Bouchard, both solid top 10ers win a grand slam this year....and they are still in the hunt at the Aus open. They would have to be considered the greatest Canadians. But Danny Nestor will always have a special place for his accomplishments and longevity!
     
  36. encylopedia

    encylopedia Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2014
    Messages:
    656
    It will always be an uphill battle for Raonic because he is a choker. I've been saying that since the first time I saw him play 3 years ago. My question back then was: can he be a Lendl/Martina N type player who overcomes that to become a solid winner (though still vulnerable to nerves against worthy/better opponents), or will he keep choking. So far, it's the latter, and it looks like it will always be that way.

    Unfortunate for him, but that is the truth - and it's much easier for me to write about overcoming it, than it is for him to do.

    I write this because that was also a problem for Nestor - and that was no secret in top-level Canadian circle - or I imagine among well-seasoned observers. Even Canadian juniors practicing with Nestor would talk of this - of his ability to play top-level tennis in singles....in practice. Doubles turned out to be perfect for him - he needs a teammate out there. In single though, it was painful to watch him sometimes go into a shell, and play like a shadow of what he was capable of....suddenly instead of 9 aces in a set, he'd get 1, and horrific push/slice forehand returns would appear....
     
  37. Ramon

    Ramon Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2011
    Messages:
    3,575
    Location:
    Florida
    Like I said in my last post, it's the hair! He needs to loosen up a bit. Then he'll stop choking! :lol:
     
  38. encylopedia

    encylopedia Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2014
    Messages:
    656
    HUH??? Is he getting hairballs like my sweet cat? ;-)
     
  39. BGod

    BGod Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    1,068
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    Daniel Nestor is still #1.

    Sure, singles is more prestigious but the man has 8 Grand Slam titles, 4 Tour Finals and a Gold Medal.

    I think to beat that resume we'd need a 4-time Slam singles champion at least.
     
  40. Dan L

    Dan L Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,087
    Bedard has 12 international singles titles, 3 Canadian singles titles.

    How many Canadian players have won the Canadian singles championship since WWII?
     
  41. BGod

    BGod Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    1,068
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    Thing is, if doubles was just out and out worthless then more guys in the 10-20 range would be pairing up for the prize money. Anyone here remember when Nadal & Djokovic paired up to lose in the first round of a Slam (USO I believe)?
     
  42. encylopedia

    encylopedia Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2014
    Messages:
    656
    Your post does not make sense. If doubles were NOT worthless then indeed more top guys would play it. Especially those trying to pad a legacy and shoot for greatness. It isn't, so for them, they'd much rather put their energy and focus into trying to get results in singles.

    Most of the top guys who make time for doubles do so for fun, practice(mcenroe), or for the pay, or some combination of them.

    The general consensus for the last thirty years or so is that if more top guys were playing doubles, then most of the doubles specialists would be out of a job, and that's probably true. But of course, the conversation was about greatness, not comparative ability, and as I have been saying, it's an open and shut case - doubles doesn't compare. If you think Roddick or Chang are eclipsed in greatness by Ken Flach - then you are in the minority, I assure you!
     
  43. newmark401

    newmark401 Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    1,058
    Here is some rare biographical information on John Fortescue Foulkes, one of the best of the Canadian players from before World War I. (His first name is often listed as James, but that's a mistake.)
    --

    Foulkes, John Fortescue
    Born 10 July 1872 in London, England
    Died 22 June 1948 in Canada

    English-born, but emigrated to Canada in 1891. At the time of the 1921 Census of Canada he was living in the district of Kingston in southern Ontario with his American-born wife Margaret Foulkes (née Thomas) and two children, a son called Fortescue and a daughter, Francesca.

    In the same census John Foulkes gives his occupation as officer. He had served in the Canadian before and during World War I. During the war he achieved the rank of Major in the Canadian Service Corps (4th Canadian Division). He had previously often been referred to as Captain Foulkes. He was appointed a Chevalier de la Légion d'Honneur for services during World War I.
    --

    A number of John Foulkes' lawn tennis results can be found here (the entry in question needs to be updated):

    http://www.tennisarchives.com/player.php?playerid=2624
    -----
     
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2015
  44. Mainad

    Mainad G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Messages:
    13,714
    Location:
    Manchester, UK.
    I can understand the way Canadians feel about him. I always remember how startled I felt suddenly seeing this 'American' guy running around Wimbledon wearing a Union Flag bandanna on his head and wondering "Who the heck is he? Where did he spring from?" Many British players were far from amused at the time that this unknown Canadian had suddenly leapt ahead of them in the British rankings. Ironically, despite all the initial hype and excitement, Rusedski proved to be even less successful at Wimbledon than certain native-born players like Henman who at least made semi-finals there unlike Greg. On the other hand, Rusedski did make the final of a Grand Slam at the US Open in 1997, something Henman never managed to do. Interestingly, both won one Masters tournament, both in Paris (Greg in 1998, Tim in 2003), both shared the same birthday, albeit a year apart, and both married a girl called Lucy!

    However 'British' Rusedski has become over the years (and he has turned into a first-class commentator for BBC, Sky, Eurosport etc.) he still looks and sounds exactly like the Canadian he will always be. You can never really escape your roots! :wink:
     
  45. Dan L

    Dan L Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,087
    Rusedski never abandoned his Canadian citizenship, and would probably have played for Canada if the support had been there for him.
     
  46. Marius_Hancu

    Marius_Hancu G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2004
    Messages:
    17,844
    Location:
    Montreal, Canada
  47. Dan L

    Dan L Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,087
    He played poorly for Britain in Davis Cup, below his best.....should have stuck with the Canadian team.
     
  48. Ironwood

    Ironwood Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2009
    Messages:
    688
    Location:
    North of the 49th!
     
  49. newmark401

    newmark401 Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    1,058
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2015
  50. Dan L

    Dan L Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,087
    Unfortunately, the 1957 Canadian championship results are not given....Bedard defeated Krishnan in a great final to win his country's title.
     

Share This Page