Greatest Volleyers of All Time

Discussion in 'Former Pro Player Talk' started by hoodjem, Dec 19, 2009.

  1. Limpinhitter

    Limpinhitter Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    Messages:
    9,277
    Laver
    Roche
    Gonzalez
    Rosewall
    Emerson
    Edberg
    McEnroe
    Newcombe
     
  2. hoodjem

    hoodjem G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2007
    Messages:
    12,769
    Location:
    Bierlandt
    Greatest Volleyers of All-Time

    Tier-one: McEnroe, Edberg, Laver, Rosewall, Sedgman, Roche, Emerson, Gonzales.

    Tier-two: Segura, Hoad, Newcombe, Panatta, Rafter, Henman, Cash, Kramer.

    Tier-three: Ashe, Lutz, Stich, Becker, Sampras, Nastase, Borotra.

    Tier-four: Krajicek, Perry, Gottfried, Gerulaitis.
     
    Last edited: Apr 14, 2011
  3. World Beater

    World Beater Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,751
    i love krajicek. he was my favorite player in the 90s. but imo, he was good, but i dont believe he was at the same level of volleying as becker and stich.

    Krajicek at his best could volley like the best. but day-in-day out, he is a step below. He didnt have the consistency that some of the other guys had at net. He was flubbing volleys at crucial stages in matches against many opponents.

    i also think the bryan brothers are not tier III either. Volleying in singles is different to volleying in doubles. bryans have good reflexes and good technique, but i wouldnt put them at the level of becker / stich.

    Also, i think rafter and henman should really be tier I volleyers. Rafter because of his amazing athleticism and henman had great technique. These guys also demonstrated great ability against some pretty brutal baseliners.

    becker, stich and sampras are all around the same level imo in terms of techhnique. But pete was by far the superior athlete of the three. So he could compete very well with agassi who had a good record against net rushers.
     
    Last edited: Sep 21, 2010
  4. Limpinhitter

    Limpinhitter Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    Messages:
    9,277
    My thoughts:

    - Emerson and Gonzalez were a better net players than anyone else in your second tier, as well as Newcombe and Kramer in your first tier.

    - Kramer doesn't belong among the players in your first tier.

    - Nastase, Henman and Borotra don't belong among the other players in your second tier.

    - Lutz had a better net game than Perry, Gottfried, Krajicek and Gerulaitis who weren't at the same level as Ashe, Becker and Stich in your third tier.

    - Doubles net play doesn't belong in a singles net play discussion. Two different things.

    All JMHO, of course!
     
    Last edited: Sep 21, 2010
  5. jrepac

    jrepac Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,391
    McEnroe

    As in "John"...there is really nothing more to say...no one else stacks up...
     
  6. WCT

    WCT Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2010
    Messages:
    217
    There was a 1980 issue of WORLD TENNIS. Had a player poll of the best strokes. Brian Gottfried was voted to have both the best backhand and forehand volleys among the men.

    I remember nothing else. Not how many players voted or who won any of the other strokes. I didn't buy the issue, I glanced through it in the store.

    But 30 years later I still remember that one thing. I was so surprised by it. This was after Mcenroe's first US Open win.
    I had expected to see him on at least one of the sides.
     
  7. chalkflewup

    chalkflewup Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    1,697
    Brian, truly one of the great guys in tennis. You can still find Brian on the court every day. He looks 20 years younger than his age and he's still fun to watch. If there's such a thing as a tennis gym rat, it's him. Old school. Class act.
     
    Last edited: Sep 21, 2010
  8. SusanDK

    SusanDK Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    613
    If the Bryan Brothers are even brought into this discussion, you cannot ignore other great doubles volleyers, eg. the Woodies, John Fitzgerald, Anders Järryd, Paul Haarhuis. In fact, a couple of them could be considered among the third or fourth tier best volleyers in singles, something the Bryan's certainly couldn't.

    I agree.
     
    Last edited: Sep 22, 2010
  9. SusanDK

    SusanDK Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    613

    Good lists. I only started watching tennis in the mid-70's, so my 1st tier list ends at McEnroe and Edberg. So I'll take your word for the rest of the list (I barely remember watching some of Laver and Newcombe in the early 70's).

    But I agree with you both that no one else belongs in the same category as Mac and Stefan since their time.
     
  10. Limpinhitter

    Limpinhitter Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    Messages:
    9,277
    It's hard for me to think of anyone with a more devastating overall net game than Laver. He crushed anything above net level with a swinging wrist flick, and at the same time had great touch when needed. Although small, he was the quickest player of all time, he preferred to reach for his shots, and his vertical leap was untouchable. And there was never a better, more intimidating overall athlete at the net than the 6'3" Gonzalez, who was almost as quick and athletic as laver and 7 inches taller. Gonzalez' touch at the net was near equal to Mac, and he was bigger, stronger, faster and more athletic, and he was un-lobable. Pancho had the best smash of all time.

    But, I will say that Edberg combined much of the best of both of them. He had very powerful, penetrating drive volleys similar to Laver even on low volleys. He got down to shoe-string volley's extremely well for a 6'2" player. And he covered the net as well as anyone short of Gonzalez.

    PS: In respect to Hoodjem's tier 1 list, I have read that Sedgman was considered the greatest and best conditioned athlete in the game (pre-Rosewall, Emerson and Laver). I don't know if he taught Harry Hopman, or vise versa. But, Sedgman was probably the prototype for the Aussie tradition of separating themselves from the competition through superior training and conditioning.
     
    Last edited: Sep 22, 2010
  11. pc1

    pc1 Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2008
    Messages:
    9,465
    According to Ellsworth Vines, he felt Sedgman was virtually unpassable at the net. Jack Kramer wrote that almost anything that Sedgman could get to at the net was a putaway. I've read Laver raving about the Sedgman volley calling it his best shot.

    So it's apparent that people who observed Sedgman felt he was among the greatest volleyers ever.
     
  12. Limpinhitter

    Limpinhitter Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    Messages:
    9,277
    I've read articles that described Sedgman's tactic of intentionally leaving passing allys open as a decoy, only to close the gap and pounce on passing shots when opponents took the bait. It takes a lot of self confidence in your athleticism to do that.
     
  13. WCT

    WCT Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2010
    Messages:
    217
    Awhile back, I saw a youtube video of him giving tennis instructions. Yeah, he looked a bit older, but like someone who had aged well.
     
  14. pc1

    pc1 Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2008
    Messages:
    9,465
    There is a story, I don't know if it's true or not that Brian practiced tennis on the day of his wedding. :)
     
  15. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,668
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    That looks like a true story PC1 (see the quote from A. Ashe below). Tennis pros used to mention how Gottfried would hit his volleys with great form. He's famous for his volley form especially. He always seemed ready/prepared and he did get to net often. I used to really enjoy watching Brian Gottfried and trying to learn from his form, racquet preparation and footwork. He just didn't have the firepower to deal with the likes of Connors, Vilas, and Borg. He was an especially dangerous doubles player.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFJy4rpu7X4 (vs. Vilas at the '77 FO)

    [​IMG]

    See this excerpt from his ATP Page:

     
    Last edited: Sep 22, 2010
  16. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,668
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    See some hard to find footage here of Sedgman in action.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6geuG5WfXs

     
  17. Limpinhitter

    Limpinhitter Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    Messages:
    9,277
  18. urban

    urban Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2005
    Messages:
    4,377
    Agree about Sedgman, especially on the forehand side he was deadly. I once read a register of the best strokes in the 50s: Best serve Gonzalez, best forehand Segura (onehanded Hoad), best backhand Rosewall, best forehand volley Sedgman, best backhand volley Budge Patty, best drop shot Drobny, best overhead Mervyn Rose.
     
  19. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,668
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    I know LH. Glad you liked that. It's too bad really. I'd love to pull up say Sedgman-Rosewall matches, but I can't. We are constrained by technology. I'm firmly convinced that if we had the same quality/quantity of video/audio from the 50's, 60's, 70's, and 80's as we do of the 90's and past decade as well (with the TC, more Tennis coverage, etc.), that many would have much more appreciation for just how good past players were (especially at the very top).
     
  20. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,668
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    Thanks for the information Urban. Great players from the 1950's!

    Sedgman

    [​IMG]

    Patty

    [​IMG]
     
  21. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,668
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    [​IMG]

     
    Last edited: Sep 29, 2010
  22. pc1

    pc1 Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2008
    Messages:
    9,465
    Not only was Sedgman known for his great volleying but I understand he was one of the fastest men ever to play tennis.
     
  23. urban

    urban Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2005
    Messages:
    4,377
    Patty is an interesting character. I don't know, if he is still alive. He was the quintessential American in Paris, staying in Europe, to play the amateur circuit (for good appearance money and the adoration of nice women). Did the double Paris-Wimbledon 1950 (Sedgman always thought, that he should have won the final at Wim). Retired, he became a painter, who had some success on the art market.
     
  24. hoodjem

    hoodjem G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2007
    Messages:
    12,769
    Location:
    Bierlandt
    Did you ever hear the story of Laver intentionally lobbing short to Roscoe Tanner baiting him to hit a smash. Laver would then rush to the net to take the smash in the air for a putaway volley.

    Apparently it rattled Tanner so much that anyone would dare to challenge his smash, his game broke down and he lost the match fairly easily. (I think it was a California hard-court tournament in the mid-70s.)
     
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2010
  25. pc1

    pc1 Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2008
    Messages:
    9,465
    Pretty amazing what Laver could do. I read what he was on his game in doubles, the other side would have to protect themselves and I assume this meant from physical harm.
     
  26. hoodjem

    hoodjem G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2007
    Messages:
    12,769
    Location:
    Bierlandt
    Was it you told me about Laver and Newcombe beating Stan Smith and Erik van Dillen
    6-1, 6-2, 6-4 in Davis Cup doubles in 1973 in Cleveland? And what Laver did to Smith's confidence?

    (The Aussies beat the Americans: 5-0.)
     
    Last edited: Sep 26, 2010
  27. urban

    urban Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2005
    Messages:
    4,377
    Newcombe in his book refers to a point at 0-30 on Smith's first service game, when Laver stepped in and hit the "hardest backhand return, he ever saw" - right through the stunned van Dillen at the net. Newk writes, it was like a knock out blow, and afterwards the rattled Yanks only tried to hold their hands up high and to cover their heads.
     
  28. BTURNER

    BTURNER Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,607
    Location:
    OREGON

    I have never seen this done. I am trying to imagine how anyone can anticipate where the smash was going in time to be close enough to get a racket on it and do it two or three times in a match, let alone hit a volley back. Players just don't move forward to return a smash.
     
  29. powerslave

    powerslave Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2009
    Messages:
    255
    Location:
    Groton, CT
    Those were the days of woodies not much pace and top on the ball so intentionally leaving passing allys and then closing them at the last moment do not come as a surprise to me, moreover 20-30 years down the line such things often tend to get exaggerated and interpreted by a tennis fan in his/her own way .
     
  30. Limpinhitter

    Limpinhitter Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    Messages:
    9,277
    Let me guess, you've never seen the pros play with wood racquets!
     
    Last edited: Sep 26, 2010
  31. hawk eye

    hawk eye Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Messages:
    2,090
    On the ones that i have seen playing live:
    Edberg the best BH volleys, Rafter, arguably the best FH volleys, McEnroe the best touch volleys, Sampras the best half volleys.

    Overall, Pete Sampras.
     
  32. Borg Forever

    Borg Forever Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2010
    Messages:
    74
    Location:
    Long Island, New York
    Roddick.

    LOL, jk.

    Stefan Edberg. Period.
     
  33. cigrmaster

    cigrmaster Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    433
    Location:
    Sarasota FL
    I have watched tennis since 1962. I have seen the entire open era.

    This is how the list should read.

    Tier 1= Macenroe, there is no one else in this tier, he is the greatest of all time.

    Tier 2 = Laver, Sampras,Edberg and Nastasse. People have no idea what a genius Nasty was.

    Tier 3 = Rosewall, Newcombe, Roche .

    All of you enamored with Rafter...........please try and get real. He is not even in the conversation.
     
  34. Limpinhitter

    Limpinhitter Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    Messages:
    9,277
    Nastase was a better volleyer than Rosewall, Newcombe and Roche? "UHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!" - Lurch Adams
     
  35. cigrmaster

    cigrmaster Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    433
    Location:
    Sarasota FL

    Yes............he was better. Have you ever seen him play live? Other than Macenroe he has the softest hands of anyone. His angles and drop volleys were amazing.
     
  36. pc1

    pc1 Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2008
    Messages:
    9,465
    Sorry I have to disagree here. Nastase was a good volleyer and his quickness and anticipation at the net were excellent but Rosewall for example was just as quick and also had super anticipation plus he had more penetrating volleys.

    Nastase had some problems putting volleys away.

    Roche was renowned for his great backhand volley but his forehand volley was excellent also.

    Newcombe in his prime had the best first volley in the game.

    Difference between McEnroe and Nastase was that while McEnroe had the touch at the net as Nastase, he wouldn't give opponents additional chances to pass him that Nastase might. Nastase usually got away with it because of his great quickness and anticipation at the net but against guys like Borg and Rosewall for example, giving them second chances to pass often was fatal.

    Bear in mind I think the world of Nastase as a player. He was truly one of the great wasted talents. I would pay a lot to see Nastase at his best against a Federer if it were possible.
     
    Last edited: Sep 29, 2010
  37. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,668
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    PC1, good discussion of Nastase on the volley vs. Rosewall, Newcombe, and Roche. Perhaps Nastase was at his best volleying on clay, relative to grass courts, because of his excellent movement in the frontcourt. Would you agree?

    So, overall, it appears that there is little doubt that McEnroe, Edberg, Sampras, and Laver are among the greatest volleyers ever. There's a slight disagreement at this stage around Nastase. We agree though that such players as Newcombe, Rosewall, and Roche are all fine volleyers as well. It's just that McEnroe, Edberg, Sampras, and Laver seem to be in a whole different league.

    Al these guys mentioned are superb volleyers, especially compared to most of the players of today (although volleying in doubles among "specialists" is a different discussion, for example, how about the Bryan Brothers, Paes, etc.?).

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Q13_STOUBc ( See some fine volleying here. Laver d. Newcombe 6-4, 5-7, 6-4, 6-4 in the '69 W Final. Thanks to TW Poster Krosero)


    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Sep 29, 2010
  38. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,668
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG] (Roche imparting wisdom)
     
  39. Limpinhitter

    Limpinhitter Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    Messages:
    9,277
    Yes, I've seen him play live, up close, in a WCT event. He was the #1 seed. I've also seen Rosewall, Emerson and Newcombe live. Nastase was a great athlete, with what seemed like effortless court coverage and great touch in all aspects of the game. But, no, Nastase's net game was not as good as theirs. Further, Nastase's net game wasn't as good as his backcourt game. Nastase's best surface was clay. Moreover, all 3 of them were better all around players than Nastase. JMHO, of course!
     
    Last edited: Sep 29, 2010
  40. Limpinhitter

    Limpinhitter Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    Messages:
    9,277
    I agree with this! As for Federer, his forehand would be the difference, as usual. On clay, Nastase would probably be favored.
     
  41. pc1

    pc1 Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2008
    Messages:
    9,465
    But wouldn't it be interesting. Nastase and his antics plus Nastase's forehand was also pretty great and his backhand had a million ways of confusing opponents. How would Federer handle the Nastase style and behavior?

    Both guys can run like the wind so you figure the rallies would be out of this world.
     
  42. Limpinhitter

    Limpinhitter Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    Messages:
    9,277
    Duplicate!
     
    Last edited: Sep 30, 2010
  43. Limpinhitter

    Limpinhitter Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    Messages:
    9,277
    ^^^ I'm not that intriged by that matchup. I'd rather see Nastase against Ralph on clay. On grass, I'd rather see Laver, or Mac against Federer. On hard, I'd rather see Sampras or Agassi against Federer.
     
  44. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,668
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    I agree LH. I'd take Federer over Nastase on fast surfaces. Yet, I'd take Nastase on clay. I had the chance to be a ballboy for a Nastase match in 1978 or 1979 (he was about 32-33 by then) . This was at a WCT-Birmingham, AL event indoors. He was still a great player and a very strong athlete. Noah was pretty impressive too, as were Teltscher, Amritraj, and especially Connors. Overall, I do tend to agree that Nastase was stronger off the ground than the net. Even though Nastase was a great mover, in my opinion, Federer is quicker/faster than Nastase. Yet, Nastase has incredible hands.
     
  45. Limpinhitter

    Limpinhitter Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    Messages:
    9,277
    I'm not sure if Federer is quicker than Nastase was. It's hard to tell. Neither seem to ever exert themselves when moving on the court. One thing I have to say about Nastase is that he never seemed to be out of position or rushed to set up for a shot. What Federer is, is a more focused, more dedicated, tennis player, with the best forehand of all time.
     
  46. SusanDK

    SusanDK Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    613
    From my read of the thread, little doubt about McEnroe, Edberg and Laver among the greatest. Many have placed Sampras down a tier from those.

    As mentioned previously, or perhaps in another thread, if you introduce doubles players to the discussion, you have to consider many more than the Bryans and Paes.
     
  47. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,668
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    Susan DK, maybe. One would have to argue that Sampras was not the volleyer that the "big three" were, and that he was really no better volleying than Newcombe, Rosewall, Roche, and others. That's a tough one. I wouldn't argue too much if one chose to put him in a second tier, along with Rosewall, Roche, and company. On doubles players, yes, when you bring in doubles, there are tons of really good volleyers out there besides the Bryans and Paes, that's true. The dynamics are just so different than singles. Yet, when we are discussing volleying, it's hard to overlook some of the volleying you see in the doubles game. Incredible reflex volleys for one thing.
     
  48. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,668
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    Yes PC1, I'd love to watch that too. Federer vs. Nastase on red clay would be interesting. I'd take Nadal vs. Nastase as well. I suppose Federer would just try to be serious and steamroll Nastase. Nastase may very well try and frustrate Federer, but with Borg for example, he was pretty tame and well behaved. Beating Nastase on clay would not be very easy for anyone. Nastase could be a handful on red clay especially. He relished it. He's another guy who I think would be great with any type of frame, wood or otherwise.
     
  49. pc1

    pc1 Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2008
    Messages:
    9,465
    Nastase against either Nadal or Federer would be interesting in that you know Nadal and Federer has ever faced a player quite like Nastase. I'm not just talking about his antics but his unique style of spins, touch, angles, volleys and power. How would they handle it? I would tend to favor Nastase over Federer on red clay and I would favor Nadal over Nastase on red clay. However Nastase was a very strong slow clay player and I think the rallies between the very swift Nastase and the super fast Nadal would be something.

    I have a hunch Nastase would get under Federer's skin with his behavior. Somehow I don't see Nadal being affected that much.
     
  50. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,668
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    I agree. I'd take Nastase over Federer on red clay, more often than not, and with Nadal, I'd have to pick Nadal on clay. Yes, the rallies would be amazing. Check this out. Nastase and Connors in 1981 at RG practicing, from the documentary, "The French" by William Klein. Nastase was about 35 here.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFUYVOEAPrs

    and in this more extended clip with Borg included: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vPWLylD7Yg
     

Share This Page