Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by roysid, Jul 30, 2012.
Just off the top of my head...add in Nicolas Mahut.
And Phillipp Kohlschreiber.
How exactly is that a bad thing?
The purpose of your very existence is to vainly try to assert that every facet of Nadal's game, physique and conditioning is superior to Federer's, and here you are admitting that Federer doesn't run out of energy and Nadal does.
If Nadal 'runs out of energy' at a slam, I guess we can put a huge asterisk over the winner of that slam, because Nadal ran out of energy in it? If he didn't run out of energy, obviously he would have won it? Guess it sucks that not running out of energy first is a huge part of being a good tennis player.
Separate names with a comma.