Discussion in 'Racquets' started by TennisManiac, May 31, 2014.
They dont like that.
I have two demos - a Prestige Rev Pro and XT Speed Rev Pro right now, that I've restrung both with Lux 4G Rough 46lbs. I've also added lead to each, the P rev pro is leaded up to 12.3oz 7pts headlight, and the S Rev Pro is around 11.7oz 8-9 pts headlight. I have all the lead on the S Rev Pro starting at 1/2" up from the butt to make it feel like 27".
I'm not a fan of this grip shape either - very rectangular. I just cut the hybrid Tour Bite/Biphase on this racquet. Poly on this stick is just to jarring - it was absolutely brutal on the elbow if you mishit a return.
Replace the hybrid with full-bed of X-One Biphase @53. Better than before, but I agree with you about the power to control ratio is not ideal. The string bed still feels quite stiff, so I can probably go lower, but with lower tension I suspect this stick will be unwieldy to control.
Good: A lot of power for serve. About 10-15% more than GSP. Volleys.
Bad: Not much control on ground strokes. Balls tends to fly easily - just too much power.
The racquet seems to also have a high launch angle.
I received my GRad Pro as a gift from my colleagues, Coming from a weighted PS95 Blx, my first impressions were similar to most peoples comments: stiff, hollow and vibrations galore. It was strung up with a full bed of Cyclone. I did not like the feel but noticed more spin and control.
So to offset the cons I thought of using natural gut mains and poly crosses to alleviate the stiffness and gain more controllable power. then I added some silicone in the handle and balanced it with some lead tape on the hoop to kill some of the vibrations.
This worked pretty well for me and is now one of my go to sticks.
This frame is an absolute monster. Absolutely loving it and will probably be my next choice of frame after my pro open dies.
If you're looking to pound serves in, hit wicked slice, and have controllable/powerful ground strokes, this is a frame worth trying.
Anyone saying this frame is jarring is probably not capable of wielding it or just shouldn't. You need to hit cleanly with any frame, not just stiffer ones. Even with full stiff poly, this frame feels solid, stable, and not uncomfortable in my opinion. It is a frame that rewards full fast strokes. *Not for the weak hearted*
Yo even Fuji said that this thing feels like a hollow steel pipe to his elbow and he certainly is a good player… This racquet simply is arm problems in wait for many people, which does not speak for its comfort. By the way, the Babolat Play data shows that Rafa hits around 50% of his shots right in the sweetspot from what I can remember. The higher the level you play at, the more difficult it is to hit the sweetspot as well. A racquet which at even occasional mishits causes severe vibrations and pain to many does not deserve to be called comfortable.
Better option to get the MP and customize
I agree with a lot of what you had to say, bud, but hear me out.
Fuji is a wonderful player, I've seen his videos. He also has lots of problems with tennis elbow that are chronic and flair up very often for him. Maybe it was also due to the strings he had in particular and the tension, but this racket is very playable and not too stiff to use on a daily basis, as I have done for a few days.
What one person believes may not suit the next person. I just feel like there is usually a stigma about stiff frames on these forums that needs to get ironed out. Id say about 90% of players use frames with a stiffness above 65 RA. Food for thought.
I find the MP to be erratic with its sweet spot. Feels like a pure drive with a much smaller spin window. Why would I buy a pure drive play-alike when I can have the real deal?
You lost me brother
To each their own
Why wait if you love it! Frames do not die imo. I am playing frames from the mid 90's still feel fine.
add lead and a leather grip to the mp and it becomes a wonderful stick, not trampoline like the pd
Exactly. At 64 RA its a smoother ride too
It has very little to do with the RA my friend… If RA was all, life as a racquet lover would be much easier
I disagree. RA has a lot to do with how a racket plays in my opinion
imo its a really great starting point for customization
295grams is feather weight
you can add a bunch of weight to it, 50 grams in balancing it out and making it very personal is easy to do
and its not too stiff
Yes, if you are trying to match frames it is MUCH easier. Plus frame is softer, win win
Short hitting session, new Graph vs the old orange and black RadPro.....
Graph is lighter, especially SW, stiffer, feel like smaller sweetspot, is quicker.
Old one is SOLID, give back exactly what you put in, but no more than that.
Like most new vs old rackets, the same traits.
i forgot about caps.... im doing this
It's like a hammer with CAPs, completely changes it.
I had used caps on an old prestige, i prefer the look to be honest, but also i have lead under the grommets, i might be able to take a bit off with it
itll be nice to try anyways
It is vastly exaggerated. If I compare the "low flex" of a Prince Textreme to the "low flex" of a C10 Pro (both in the same ballpark in terms of RA) I would be looking at the racquets in wonder, because the C10 feels so much softer. Similarly for a few racquets with higher RAs.
RA is just the flex across the whole length of the frame, but it is locational (extent of) flex which really determines how a racquet plays and feels. There is no measure for that unfortunately.
So, again, RA may only hint at something but it can be very misleading.
CAPs are great for protecting the frame (and I still haven't got around to putting blak CAPs on my IG radical MP). These CAPs add quite a lot of weight though.
i have about 60 grams worth of lead, i can take off some from the head
Separate names with a comma.