Discussion in 'Racquets' started by Tennis Guy, Aug 9, 2004.
I was wondering how they compare, and what the likenesses and differences of them are.
I wouldn't take the chance of the "wrath" ascending upon me by making a statement of which is better. Both are fine racquets and both have the following. The LM perhaps has an edge in power and a sweet-spot that extends a little further in the top of the head. The Classic, for me, has more flex. Either are about "performance" and a test ride would be necessary for one to truly experience which feels best for them. I suggest that players that are somewhat "accomplished" and are looking for precision in their game might try either!
I'm not asking which one is better, I am asking for a comparison.
See the July 26, 2004 post re this subject:
Separate names with a comma.