Headsize and Spin..My Thoughts

Discussion in 'Racquets' started by dirkgnuf, Apr 30, 2007.

  1. dirkgnuf

    dirkgnuf Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Messages:
    363
    The other day, I was just thinking about tennis and I realized something. I recall looking at videos of Bjorn Borg hitting tremendous topspin with his 68 in Donnay Pro. Then I looked at Federer, Agassi, Nadal, and myself.

    What I noticed about Borg which I don't seem to notice much with other players is his extreme, exaggerated low to high swing. I assumed that he had to use such a swing to produce the topspin from his racquet. However, now that racquet head size is larger and beam width has increased, there's a greater angle to generate spin from. When I look at today's pros they all seem to lack that extreme low to high swing. I mean, I looked at the USTA video pro tennis analysis, and pros seem to generate lots of topspin with less of a low high swing, a less swing slope.

    My question is, am I right about this? All players mentioned used semi-western to western grips with open stance etc, yet their swing paths are noticably different as are their racquet headsizes
    I mean, I doubt that Agassi could generate as much topspin as he usually does if he used Federer's racquet, so my other question is, when people say that you have to possess good technique to get spin of dense string patterns or small headsizes, would that also mean they'd need a more exaggerated low-to high swing, or in Federer's case, extreme pronation etc.
    Thanks
     
    Last edited: May 1, 2007
    #1
  2. Bottle Rocket

    Bottle Rocket Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    2,658
    Location:
    Kansas City, MO
    I don't think there is any relationship...

    Federer's swing is not so unorthodox, he just get's tremendous racket head speed on all shots. His timing is perfect.

    Nadal does have an exaggerated low to high swing. After all, he does end his swing over his head most of the time.

    If you look at the rest of the current pro's in the top 100 the majority of them use frames within a few inches of 98. You can find all styles of play.

    Not nearly enough people following any patterns to come to any conclusions in my opinion.

    I am not totally sure what your conclusion is. You need a sharper swing path with a smaller head? Flatter swings produce the same amount of spin with an OS?
     
    #2
  3. dirkgnuf

    dirkgnuf Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Messages:
    363
    Clarified what I meant to say.
     
    #3
  4. Roger_Federer.

    Roger_Federer. Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    680
    I don't get the question....
     
    #4
  5. travlerajm

    travlerajm Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Messages:
    4,416
    Most of today's pro racquets are more spin-efficient than the racquets of Borg's day. Federer's setup is designed for maximum bite, so that he doesn't need a steep swingpath to hit lots of topspin. Roddick's setup, in contrast, is designed for maximum power. It is has a less polarized weight distribution, so Roddick needs to use a steeper swingpath to hit with as much topspin as Federer does.
     
    #5
  6. thefan

    thefan Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2006
    Messages:
    808
    Interesting, how does one get a racquet to achieve maximum bite. Take my PS85 for example, can you suggest me a setup for that racquet for more "bite" / spin?
     
    #6

Share This Page