How arrogant of Federer????

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by fed_is_GOD, Mar 4, 2012.

  1. fed_is_GOD

    fed_is_GOD Professional

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    971
    Location:
    Berlin
    #1
  2. fed_is_GOD

    fed_is_GOD Professional

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    971
    Location:
    Berlin
    #2
  3. Homeboy Hotel

    Homeboy Hotel Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2011
    Messages:
    2,775
    Location:
    London
    No idea why I'm responding to a person with the username 'fed_is_GOD' about RF's arrogance but...

    In the likely (or unlikely) case he qualifies for London, Nike still need to design/develop/research/show to Fed for approval/manufacture/produce/promote/sell the retails of these shirts in the case he does qualify.

    And if he qualifies for the WTF (in say, August/September), that can't be done in 3 months. I heard somewhere Nike develops all their clothing 18 months in advance, so they're designing Wimbledon/Fall 2013 as we speak.

    They even made Del Potro's WTF 2010 outfit, but obviously was never seen on court.
     
    Last edited: Mar 4, 2012
    #3
  4. That outfit is pure win. I hope Roger qualifies... can't wait to see him in that attire.
     
    #4
  5. stringertom

    stringertom Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2010
    Messages:
    26,403
    Location:
    On the lam from the sewretchian vortex
    The "pure win" shirt is the black crew w/red stripes...two for two in that one. So Sexi!
     
    #5
  6. thienzsch

    thienzsch New User

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2012
    Messages:
    73
    It's highly unlikely for him not to qualify since he already has around 1700points from this season and last years number eight Mardy Fish only had 2800 so he only needs 1000 more
     
    #6
  7. ZeroSkid

    ZeroSkid Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2011
    Messages:
    1,440
    Location:
    Canada
    They look sick
     
    #7
  8. PrinceMoron

    PrinceMoron Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 1, 2009
    Messages:
    3,846
    How arrogant??

    The etmology is rogare "ask, propose" so Roger is a good example of nominative determinism. If your name is Rookie, then you are going to get rolled over, but Rogers are entitled to be arrogant, literally.
     
    #8

Share This Page