How Do You Define 'Strong Era'

Discussion in 'Former Pro Player Talk' started by hoodjem, Oct 19, 2009.

  1. abmk

    abmk G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2008
    Messages:
    15,724
    Location:
    U.S
    5 years of winning a slam atleast, either being no2/no1 for that whole period. If that doesn't qualify as an all-time-great ....

    So according to you becker,edberg,wilander aren't all-time greats ?
     
    Last edited: Oct 24, 2009
    #51
  2. lawrence

    lawrence Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,878
    This. "Strong Era" is a stupid, hypocritical term, made up by Samprastards.
    The argument contradicts itself so much it's not funny. But some people are too dense to see that.
     
    #52
  3. akv89

    akv89 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,587
    DELETED
    10 char
     
    Last edited: Oct 24, 2009
    #53
  4. hoodjem

    hoodjem G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2007
    Messages:
    12,668
    Location:
    Bierlandt
    True, but Lendl did lose to Borg at the 1981 final of the FO, so one could posit that they competed against each other, and thus overlapped in the game.
     
    #54

Share This Page