How exactly is the 2004 women's wimbledon final a "classic"?

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Sid_Vicious, Jun 13, 2011.

  1. Sid_Vicious

    Sid_Vicious G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    11,683
    Location:
    In The City
    Tennis channel is replaying wimbledon classics this week and I thought it was strange that they consider the 2004 women's final between Sharapova and Serena to be a classic. That match was such a dud. A straight set beatdown can't be considered a classic. They should have replayed the Venus vs Davenport final of 2005.
     
    #1
  2. MichaelNadal

    MichaelNadal Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2007
    Messages:
    28,994
    Location:
    Tuning Up The Band...
    Amen, what a crazy match. They were really going at it.
     
    #2
  3. BrooklynNY

    BrooklynNY Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    Messages:
    1,627
    I agree, this is lame. It's just because of the 'brands' (lol) Maria Sharapova vs. Serena Williams.

    It could have also been a Home Shopping Network segment selling perfume.
     
    #3
  4. Sentinel

    Sentinel Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    Messages:
    29,194
    Location:
    Brave New World
    My telly here in India (each year, in June) plays everything from the Borg vs Mac match (full 3 hours) to the matches of the last few years both mens and womens. So i don;t think you should single out any match.

    Yes, now that you mention it there are a lot of Serena matches, incl one with Zheng in it.
     
    #4
  5. Tony48

    Tony48 Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2008
    Messages:
    6,879
    What's even dumber is that they are only showing 30 mins of each match.
     
    #5
  6. Legend of Borg

    Legend of Borg Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    7,922
    Location:
    Pazardjik, Bulgaria
    Davenport is taller than Sharapova.

    Didn't know that.
     
    #6
  7. DRII

    DRII Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Messages:
    6,410
    And...

    why do all the classic matches have to be in the finals? Many times, I find the semi-finals to be better. Like the Nole - Federer semi at the French this year vs the final...

    The Venus - Sharapova semi of 2005 Wimbledon was a very good match.
     
    #7
  8. Wozupniacki

    Wozupniacki Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2010
    Messages:
    229
    It's the only Wimbledon final in the 21st century where a Williams played and a non-Williams won! ;-)
     
    #8
  9. NadalAgassi

    NadalAgassi Guest

    Serena played awful for her standards in that final. Not to take anything away from Maria who played one of her best matches ever and fully deserved to win Wimbledon that day, but with Serena's play that day it was far from one of the classics.

    I agree with DR11 that the Wimbledon semis of 2005 between Sharapova and Venus was better. Also the 2005 Wimbledon finals between Venus and Davenport. And the 2005 Wimbledon semis between Davenport and Mauresmo was outstanding too. That was one of the best womens Wimbledons in recent memory.

    If there was a classic in 2004 it was the semifinal between Serena and Mauresmo.

    The 2006 Wimbledon final between Henin and Mauresmo was also great.

    And of course the 2009 Wimbledon semis between Serena and Dementieva.
     
    #9
  10. Ronaldo

    Ronaldo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    14,150
    My pick is the 1977 semi between Borg and Gerulaitis, I own it. Actually they own the GMOAT IMHO. http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/Wim...Gerulaitis_DVD/descpageKULTUR-77MATCHDVD.html
     
    #10
  11. Joe Pike

    Joe Pike Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2005
    Messages:
    3,310

    Sharapova played great tennis. A major drubbing for a top player (eg. S. Williams) also can be a "classic".


    Just take the 1992 Wimbledon final when Steffi crushed #1 Seles with 62 61.
    A classic without any doubt!!
    You can watch this match over and over again and still be suprised every time how superb Steffi played.
     
    #11
  12. Ledigs

    Ledigs Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    4,074
    Location:
    NY
    I saw this on tv last night and thought the exact same thing and was going to post about it. No epic comeback?
     
    #12
  13. Federerx16

    Federerx16 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2010
    Messages:
    198
    And that makes it a classic how?
     
    #13
  14. Joe Pike

    Joe Pike Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2005
    Messages:
    3,310

    Well, 1992 was the only Wimbledon final of the 20th century where a Seles played and a non-Seles won.
    And it was a classic!
     
    #14
  15. Tennis_Monk

    Tennis_Monk Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2005
    Messages:
    3,477
    You are right. It is not a classic.
     
    #15
  16. 1970CRBase

    1970CRBase Guest

    Hingis vs Novotna 1997 Final was a good but overlooked match.
     
    #16
  17. Ronaldo

    Ronaldo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    14,150
    Surprised the Serena-Dementieva match from 2009 is one of the classics. Only because it was not a final.
     
    #17

Share This Page