How long before Shot Spot calls faults instantly?

Discussion in 'Odds & Ends' started by NE1for10is?, Jan 19, 2012.

  1. NE1for10is?

    NE1for10is? Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    475
    How long before Shot Spot calls faults instantly without the need for line judges?
     
    #1
  2. Kurte954

    Kurte954 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2011
    Messages:
    136
    I doubt that will ever happen. Line judges vs Hawk eye make for good drama and the fans love the Hawk Eye challenge. Without lines people, there would be no challenge and the game would lose something, in my opinion.
     
    #2
  3. angharad

    angharad Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2006
    Messages:
    498
    They could have instituted automatic line calling with technology widely available before Shot Spot, and didn't. I think Shot Spot is more to appease contentious calls than it is to replace the linespeople.
     
    Last edited: Jan 19, 2012
    #3
  4. ollinger

    ollinger Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    5,918
    The technology is there to do it now but there's no will to do it. Baseball has had the technology for a few years to have balls and strikes called instantly and automatically but again the sport prefers not to eliminate some traditional aspects.
     
    #4
  5. ChipNCharge

    ChipNCharge Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2004
    Messages:
    1,026
    Location:
    Green Country
    #5
  6. Anton

    Anton Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    3,130
    Location:
    Staten Island
    Drama at cost of accuracy?

    Reminds me of gardening with nail clippers. There is better way to do it but it's shooo kool.
     
    #6
  7. jswinf

    jswinf Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2009
    Messages:
    1,141
    I'd like it to call a shot out before it's hit, that would save a lot of time.
     
    #7
  8. Kurte954

    Kurte954 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2011
    Messages:
    136
    I wish I could reference them, but the stats I've seen when watching matches show that the line judges are right a lot of the time. Remember, each event has requirements for line judges. They don't just grab people randomly.

    When you consider how many matches are played at a slam, with how many line calls made for each match, the accuracy rate is well within an acceptable range.
     
    #8
  9. El Diablo

    El Diablo Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    3,536
    ^^ you miss the point. Nobody doubts that the judges "are right alot of the time" but that can be improved upon, so why not. Anyone who saw the famous US Open down-the-line call in Serena's match some years ago knows line calls can be astoundingly bad at times.
     
    #9
  10. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    34,752
    We need to break-up the umpires and line judges unions and go with free enterprise.
     
    #10
  11. r2473

    r2473 Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    Messages:
    6,962
    Imagine if they really had to pay union dues out of the princely sum they earn:

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...tennis-association-claiming-overtime-pay.html


    According to the umpires, pay for last year’s Open ranged from $115 a day for USTA sectional or provisional umpires in qualifying matches to $200 a day for gold-badge chair umpires in main-draw matches. Umpires often worked more than eight hours a day, seven days a week, depending on the length of matches and weather delays, they said.
     
    #11
  12. Irvin

    Irvin G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2007
    Messages:
    11,808
    Location:
    Marietta, Ga
    Never I hope. As soon as they do that all the players will start arguing about the integrity of the line calls and have them turn the system off and it will go the way of Cyclops.
     
    #12
  13. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    34,752
    These umpires will bankrupt the tournaments with their exorbitant demands
     
    #13
  14. pennc94

    pennc94 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    753
    Location:
    Maryland
    Players seem to accept the technology now, so why would they start to dispute it if it made all calls?

    I think the current technology is vastly improved over Cyclops. I seem to recall the Cyclops had its limitations.

    I think the current technology (and its improvements over time) should be used for all calls. A chair umpire can remain to resolve other disputes. It is just ridiculous to make players decide about challenging if the "truth" is known. They should be focused on the tennis.
     
    #14
  15. West Coast Ace

    West Coast Ace G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    13,255
    Location:
    So Cal
    Like Pre Crime in 'Minority Report' - we'd know how the match was going to play out - could fast forward through the boring ones.

    I think some 'old people' in the various tennis federations around the world have to die and be replaced by younger people who aren't tied to Legacy and Tradition. Then the system will be implemented totally.
     
    #15
  16. jswinf

    jswinf Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2009
    Messages:
    1,141
    You're not planning anything, I hope. :shock:
     
    #16
  17. Ducker

    Ducker Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2010
    Messages:
    326
    You guys want to eliminate more JOBS? Ok lets all be unemployed.

    IDIOTS....

    These are good jobs and you want to get rid of them all WOW.
     
    #17
  18. Anton

    Anton Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    3,130
    Location:
    Staten Island
    Yes - we want to eliminate more useless manual labor jobs and make more high tech jobs that produce superior product.

    And why why is the dumbest ones are also the first ones to call people idiots?
     
    Last edited: Jan 21, 2012
    #18

Share This Page