How many Grand Slams will Gasquet win ??

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by david22, Jul 8, 2007.

?

How many Grand Slams will Gasquet win ??

  1. 0

    27 vote(s)
    38.6%
  2. 1

    15 vote(s)
    21.4%
  3. 2

    13 vote(s)
    18.6%
  4. 3

    8 vote(s)
    11.4%
  5. more than 3

    7 vote(s)
    10.0%
  1. david22

    david22 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    365
    i'm a great fan of this player and i'm more and more convinced that he'll win a GS in the future.
    How many?? i would say 2 (1 Wimbledon and 1 AO) at most.
    Actually i would already be happy if he won "only" one Grand Slam.
    it would be a shame in my opinion if such a talented player ended up with no Slams in his bag.
     
    Last edited: Jul 8, 2007
    #1
  2. 93sq.

    93sq. Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    461
    Location:
    Italy!
    Probably...if he will win one slam....he will win AO
     
    #2
  3. Jasyn19

    Jasyn19 New User

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2006
    Messages:
    45
    Location:
    Florence, Italy
    In spite of his Wimbledon semi yesterday against Federer, he's never got beyond the fourth round in any of the slams, and no better than the third round in the French - which is surprising considering his upbringing on clay. Pity, cos he's such a hell of a nice guy. I hope I'm wrong, but I really don't think he's got a grand slam in him. Mental edge and all that sort of thing.
     
    #3
  4. West Coast Ace

    West Coast Ace G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    13,217
    Location:
    So Cal
    I agree that's the most likely one - but not very likely given the age of Rafa, who should start reeling off Slams after Roger gets to about 18 and goes away...

    That's obviously what he needs to work on.

    He needs to start getting to the quarter and semis regularly first.
     
    #4
  5. tennisnj

    tennisnj Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,232
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Maybe 1 to go along with his French Open Mixed Doubles title lol. So 2 total.
     
    #5
  6. Vlad

    Vlad Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2004
    Messages:
    1,437
    He can play and win on any surface. He still needs to keep improving his physical conditioning, get more experience by reaching later rounds of GS and learn how to deal with pressure at RG.

    He plays his best tennis on natural surfaces, such as grass and clay, but since he is not ready (he said it himself) to win RG, then maybe Wimbledon is his best chance. On hardcourt, I get the sense that he needs to play more aggressive.
     
    #6
  7. BigServer1

    BigServer1 Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2006
    Messages:
    5,035
    Location:
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Gasquet has the talent to win a bunch. Whether or not he will win any is a different story. I love his game and he seems like a really nice guy, so I'd like to see him win a few.
     
    #7
  8. laurie

    laurie Guest

    If we go back to June 2003 people were asking the exact same questions about Federer.
    If you have the sort of natural talent that Gasquet has, then if he wins his first slam by the age of 22 I reckon he can go on to win as much as 10. Someone with that kind of talent will be hard to stop if he puts it all together in the next two years.
     
    #8
  9. tim8

    tim8 New User

    Joined:
    May 3, 2005
    Messages:
    60
    ? Well he is only 21 and has the type of game that matures late (like Federer's). Maybe he is just breaking out. Plus Federer was brought up on clay. Are you suggesting that is his best surface?
     
    #9
  10. saram

    saram Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    5,371
    i say one....
     
    #10
  11. pow

    pow Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2007
    Messages:
    2,439
    He's a great player but I don't see him getting past the other young players. As of now, it seems Nadal, Djokovic, and Murray put it together better.
     
    #11
  12. Vision84

    Vision84 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,655
    Location:
    Cambridge, UK
    He is a young and very talented player. His match against Roddick showed that he has the goods. At such a young age there is a lot of room for improvement and I like him a lot so I hope he does win some slams. I'm sure he is capable of it.
     
    #12
  13. Ripper

    Ripper Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    4,652
    Location:
    "Where Moth & Rust Destroy"
    I'll be surprised if he doesn't win one, at least. Seriously, that's all I can say, right now.

    PS: But I'll vote "more than 3", just for the heck of it.
     
    #13
  14. Grandslam05

    Grandslam05 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    110
    I think he'll be the next Wimbledon champ thats not named Federer. I think he can win at least 2 or more Wimbledons. Add a US Open or perhaps an Australian in there and I say more than 3.
     
    #14
  15. angelsdemons8600

    angelsdemons8600 Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    Messages:
    99
    He looks like a 3 to me...He has so much potiential and I just think the draws are what is hindering him. He needs to play consistantly in more tournaments to get better draws. With better draws and a better ranking, he can do this thing!
     
    #15
  16. TheNatural

    TheNatural Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2005
    Messages:
    7,854
    2. ill check if im right in a few years time
     
    #16
  17. TacoBellBorderBowl1946

    TacoBellBorderBowl1946 Professional

    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,085
    he'll win zero.
     
    #17
  18. david22

    david22 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    365
    Are you serious about this one??
    Has Murray won 4 titles,made 2 MS finals and a Grand Slam 1/2 final yet???
     
    #18
  19. J-man

    J-man Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,053
    I think he will be like James Blake. He will make great strides at Grand Slams but he will not be able to win one. But nevertheless he is a very talented player
     
    #19
  20. david22

    david22 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    365
    i truly think that Gasquet will have a far better career than Blake.
    For a beginning,Blake was nowhere near as good as Gasquet when he was 21
    at 21,Gasquet has already won 4 titles,made a GS 1/2 final and 2 MS finals(both lost against Federer),not to mention he has beaten Federer at 18.
     
    #20
  21. BkK_b0y14

    BkK_b0y14 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2007
    Messages:
    659
    i really think he is a late bloomer. so i think he will have at least 5 (mostly wimbly's, maybe 1 AO, and 1 FO). and you can't compare him to murray because head to head gasquet rapes him.
     
    #21
  22. Feña14

    Feña14 Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    5,315
    Location:
    England
    I really like Gasquet but I think Murray and Djokovic, along with one or two of the others will become really tough to beat and Gasquet's incosistency in performing at the standard we know he can produce will consistently let him down in my opinion.

    I'd like to be proven wrong though, he's beautiful to watch and a nice lad.
     
    #22
  23. Grandslam05

    Grandslam05 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    110
    Federer also had the same problem of inconsistency at a young age. Gasquet is much more talented and complete than the other young players save Nadal. Murray is a good player but I don't see him winning any slams. The next generation of Grand Slam winners after Federer will be Nadal (still), Gasquet and Djokovic. Gasquet has the ability to be as dominant as Federer. He's just got to put it all together.
     
    #23
  24. quest01

    quest01 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,611
    I think possibly 1 or 2 if he plays until hes in his mid 30s.
     
    #24
  25. callitout

    callitout Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,303
    Needs to seriously improve his serve to win a GS on any surface other than clay...and with Nadal in the mix a clay GS is gonna be tough.
    Obviously he has all kinds of potential, and he's great fun to watch.
     
    #25
  26. JW10S

    JW10S Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    1,891
    zip, nil, nada, zilch, zero, none...
     
    #26
  27. robin7

    robin7 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,154
    Probably 1 in the absence of the top 3 players (Fed, Nad & Djoko).
     
    #27
  28. Pete Semper

    Pete Semper Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2007
    Messages:
    223
    I say Gasquet will win 1 GS...probably Wimbly. But Im pretty worried about his carreer because he reminds me a lot Henri Leconte...
     
    #28
  29. AndyRLacoste

    AndyRLacoste Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2007
    Messages:
    136
    Location:
    Oregon
    None, Rafael, Djokovic, Murray... too much competition.

    Plus, by the time Roger, Andy, James Blake, and Rafa stop winning there will be more young prospects to challenge Gasquet.
     
    #29
  30. fps

    fps Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Messages:
    5,358
    Location:
    Brighton, England
    I think Djoko and Murray (if he stays fit) will both win a grand slam before Gasquet, Djoko because he has the all around game, dour grinding ability and athleticism, Murray because he's got a surprisingly big serve, great range of shots and thinks well on court
     
    #30
  31. david22

    david22 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    365
    he is way better than Henri Leconte in my opinion.
    Has Leconte for instance beaten the number 1(and probably the best ever one) at 18??
     
    Last edited: Jul 10, 2007
    #31
  32. david22

    david22 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    365
    Don t forget he served 23 aces against Roddick (a one being at 134 mph).
    i would say he has improved his serve......now he needs to work on his forehand,especially when he moves back.
     
    #32
  33. AJK1

    AJK1 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    3,219
    Nil. Along with him and a few other hyped players that just aren't good enough while Feds and Nadal are around.
     
    #33
  34. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,655
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    He can win around 3 I think. He is talented, but even if he has 6 good years left after this one, it will be hard to win more then 1 slam every 2 years with Federer and Nadal each with several great years left probably, and Murray and Djokovic coming up with him. Actually if he wins 3 with that competition he will have done great, but I think he can do it. He is very talented and will be up with the rest contending for slams. He might win his 3 at different venues each maybe.
     
    #34
  35. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,655
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    10 is way over the top. Gasquet is very talented but he is not the next Federer. Also remember when Federer started winning slams the most established forces at the top were older Agassi, Hewitt, and Roddick. Gasquet is coming up at a time when Federer and Nadal are already at the top and so dominant, and Nadal was born within a month of him. Much harder situation he is coming into then Federer. No way he would win anywhere near 10 slams.
     
    #35
  36. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,655
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Yeah Gasquet has way more talent then Blake. Blake has already peaked, and it wasnt even that amazing a peak. 2 U.S Open quarters, some dinky tournament titles, and 2 smackdowns in big Masters event finals to Federer.
     
    #36
  37. jkonecne

    jkonecne Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    167
    Location:
    Minnesota
    I think he could eventually win one. It's a possibility, if he works hard at it. Although not right now. He's young so hes got time.
     
    #37
  38. david22

    david22 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    365

    Gasquet will be better than Nadal on fast surfaces,mark my words.......on clay,that's a different story obviously.
    anyway i agree with you about the rest: he probably won t win anywhere near 10 slams.
    we must remember that a player like Federer comes only once in a lifetime
     
    Last edited: Jul 10, 2007
    #38
  39. Zets147

    Zets147 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,744
    I think he's gonna win 1 FO, 2 Wimbledon, & 1 US Open by the time he's done.
     
    #39
  40. edmondsm

    edmondsm Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2005
    Messages:
    6,902
    Location:
    In an in between place.
    Outside Fed and Roddick, he has been one of the most if not the most consistant grass courters over the last two years. He could win a Wimbledon in his career. If he gets some confidence going who knows. I think he'll win at least one slam.
     
    #40

Share This Page