I finally did it!..

Discussion in 'Racquets' started by Portuguesetennislover, Jun 28, 2005.

  1. Portuguesetennislover

    Portuguesetennislover New User

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2005
    Messages:
    94
    After a kind of "soapopera" between deciding from a customised Vantage or a Slazenger Pro X1, I finally decided to get back to the Vantage. My problem was keeping length at 27,5 with a swingweight of 320. Mr Paul Angell, that was amazing on giving me his feedback, warned me on this matter. So I decided to go for 27,25 in order to achieve the swingweight I´ve asked for. So my custom Vantage will figure the following specs.

    Vantage 2 3 1 2 10

    Headsize: 95sq (beam 20 mm)
    String pattern: 18/20
    Stifness: 63RA
    Lenght: 27,25
    Weight/balance: 11.4 oz (320g) / 12 pts HL (305mm) unstrung
    11.9 oz (337g) / 9 pts HL (315 mm) strung
    Swingweight: 320
    Handle size: Wilson L3 / 4-3/8
    Grip type: Leather grip

    Hope it will perform as i think it will. It must arrive Friday (Fedex delivery). Trying it out during the weekend so I´ll post then my first impressions!
     
    #1
  2. iscottius

    iscottius Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    1,146
    I am glad thet Paul got you to 27.25 length & 320 swingweight--good choice --good luck with it
     
    #2
  3. Indiantwist

    Indiantwist Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2005
    Messages:
    422
    Good luck..Enjoy your racquet.
     
    #3
  4. monologuist

    monologuist Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    Messages:
    2,024
    good luck with your Vantage....just a word of warning....the string it wiull come prestrung with some people like some don't...I personally don't care for it and found that my Vantage played much better with Laserfibre Supreme 17 or a hybrid of Klip Legend gut 17/Goesn OG Micro 17....in other words, reserve your final judgement until you have the ideal string in it....the 27.25" will be a good compromise....0.25" makes a pretty big difference, surprisingly big.
     
    #4
  5. Mulligan

    Mulligan Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2004
    Messages:
    229
    Sounds like a good spec for you...best of luck!
     
    #5
  6. Portuguesetennislover

    Portuguesetennislover New User

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2005
    Messages:
    94
    Thanks for the kind words and advices... Anyway, I´ll have a full month to demoe it. But hope it won´t be necessary to send it back!
     
    #6
  7. NoBadMojo

    NoBadMojo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    11,915
    Location:
    Parts unknown
    keep in mind that if you do have to send it back, you pay the shipping back and a restocking charge (this unto itself is deceptive business policy in that they would be reselling a used frame as new if they put a used frame back into stock) and if the frame is less than perfect (ie you used it for a month in a normal way), their policy is a 60% refund and you pay the shipping back.also the frames are not made in the UK as they would lead you to believe..they are made in China. i believe any product sold in the USA, by law, must note the 'actual' country of origin which is China and not the UK.
    this from ther website
    <snp>
    Any racquet that has been used and has light damage to strings, grips or bumper guards, but has no damage to frame structure or cosmetic will be entitled to a full refund (minus a restocking fee of £15) A full refund (minus a restocking fee of £15) will be applied to your original purchase credit card for the price of the item(s) returned that meet these conditions.

    Any racquet that has been used and has suffered any frame cosmetic damage will be entitled to a 60% refund .
    <end snip>
     
    #7
  8. Portuguesetennislover

    Portuguesetennislover New User

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2005
    Messages:
    94
    Yes, I know, that´s why I only send it back if I really can´t paly with it. But I hope this won´t happen.
     
    #8
  9. bdaniels

    bdaniels New User

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    Messages:
    51
    I'm sure the vantage is going to be AWESOME but I personally would have gone with Slazenger because it would save me 150 bucks :)
     
    #9
  10. Rory G

    Rory G Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Messages:
    248
    Great decision IMO (althought the Slaz is a good frame also). It looks as though you are passionate about tennis and put quite a bit of thought into your purchase. Contrary to some anti-Vantagers, Paul is a very reasonable and customer service oriented guy....if you hit with the frame and it isn't right for you, you will probably only have to pay shipping (just like the TW demo program and unless you abuse the racquet). Believe me...Vantage is quite the opposite of "deceptive business practice"; I don't believe you will find much better service in the industry along with well made frames (based on my experiences recently). Good luck!!

    BTW..bdaniels. Since the Vantage can be had for $187 strung and the Slaz is $149 unstrung........how did you "save" $150?? ;)
     
    #10
  11. monologuist

    monologuist Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    Messages:
    2,024
    yeah....in my experience, Paul is a VERY accomodating and flexible guy. He really wants you to be happy with your racquet. You made the right decision going for Vantage over the Slazenger X-1...I've tried the Slazenger and it is a good racquet, but inferior to a Vantage of similar specs....they are similar in design, but the Vantage is gonna give you better feel, will feel more solid, less stiff.
     
    #11
  12. Gary Britt

    Gary Britt Guest

    I looked at their site and its pretty interesting, but I'd like to see them offer another head size around 104-106 sq. inches with 2 different string types, where one is 18 x 20.

    I'd also like to see disclosure of the material used to make their frames and offer more than one possible composition of the frame itself.

    Maye an option to have it foam filled if its hollow inside or an option for a solid (not hollow) composition.

    Gary Britt
     
    #12
  13. Rory G

    Rory G Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Messages:
    248
    I agree..all good points. I hope they will offer more options down the road also.
     
    #13
  14. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,299
    I understand they will be offering larger head sizes in the near future.
     
    #14
  15. Portuguesetennislover

    Portuguesetennislover New User

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2005
    Messages:
    94
    I agree with you all. But I think the Company is trying to target the general public. With this I mean that everybody that understands a little of frames and its own game can purchase a customised frame. Maybe if the specs were too many it would be a delight to most of us but definitly not to others (and I think that they are in major number). But that´s just an opinion. Also understand that at those prices surely that the raw frames comes from China and just need little work. There are a few combinatios of specs made in China but imagine the production costs if the possibilities to produce a raw frame (with more specs choice), in order to have stock to each customer specification, would multiply! Than it would be to a little elite. Because of money and because of complexity of choices reflected in each frame´s performance. Than I believe that each frame would be a custom frame. Now, in a certain way it is, but there must be at least hundreds of players with the same specs of my Vantage. Don´t mind, but also would like to choose some more details. Nevertheless this is a start for the big public.
     
    #15
  16. antontd

    antontd Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2004
    Messages:
    505
    Congratulations!
    Wait, you're not gonna change your mind again, are you?
     
    #16
  17. Guga_x

    Guga_x Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2004
    Messages:
    257
    Portuguesetennislover, this would be a one time chance for me to have a closer look at a Vantage without having to ask for one myself...

    I also am from near-Lisbon so if you let me I'd show up at your practice court to take a look. If you are ok with this PM me, or send me an email.

    Thanx.
     
    #17
  18. TripleTennisBumB

    TripleTennisBumB New User

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20
    No, he'll never be the King of Anality. That is my job.

    TripleTennisBumB
     
    #18
  19. Where can you get the racquet for 187 strung?
     
    #19
  20. Kirko

    Kirko Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    2,916
    Hey Ben welcome back !!!! I read your review on the POG longbody; I got one you were dead on ! One question how would you compare topspin to the PD + Babolat. Thanks in advance !!!!!
     
    #20
  21. Portuguesetennislover

    Portuguesetennislover New User

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2005
    Messages:
    94
    Assim que a receber não há problema nenhum.
     
    #21
  22. Portuguesetennislover

    Portuguesetennislover New User

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2005
    Messages:
    94
    Lol!!!!! ;)
     
    #22
  23. GuyPerez

    GuyPerez Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2004
    Messages:
    408
    Gary Britt,
    I think they are foam filled. I believe all they are made of is what it says on the frame, "High Modulus Carbon Fibre"
    Cheers.
     
    #23
  24. Guga_x

    Guga_x Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2004
    Messages:
    257
    Obrigado. ;)
     
    #24

Share This Page