I go headhunting in when playing doubles to rattle my opponents nerves

Discussion in 'Tennis Tips/Instruction' started by HoVa, Nov 2, 2009.

  1. HoVa

    HoVa Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2008
    Messages:
    296
    this tourney im playing in,

    We're about a 4.5-5.0 level and they were particularly known for being a wall at the net, but shady groundstrokes and weak 2nd serves.

    My team is quite the opposite. Very strong groundstrokes but a little suspect at the net.

    It seemed to work as they seemed pressured to hit more penetrating shots or else be faced with a Wilson stamp on their head. This led to easy points from unforced errors.
     
    #1
  2. split-step

    split-step Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    1,012
    Good to know.
     
    #2
  3. LeeD

    LeeD Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    35,707
    Seems to me, if they're a wall at the net and you guys are suspect volleyers......
    THEY should be headhunting you, while you duck and flub all sorts of volleys into your bodies. They, on the other hand, should just stroke deep up middle to open up the sides and push you off the court.
     
    #3
  4. Noveson

    Noveson Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,241
    Cool? And there would be no wilson stamp. What are you getting at?
     
    #4
  5. Slazenger07

    Slazenger07 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2009
    Messages:
    1,068
    zero point to this thread.......
     
    #5
  6. Mick

    Mick Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    8,350
    be careful, the head hunter could become the head huntee :shock:
     
    #6
  7. SlapChop

    SlapChop Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2009
    Messages:
    403
    I always return a head shot with a head shot. I won't start that kind of play but am never afraid to play that way.
     
    #7
  8. NickH87

    NickH87 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    666
    If you are purposely aiming for players faces, I would really be careful about who it is you are playing with. Its strategy going to the body and feet, but the face is a dangerous spot and even though its a sport, that doesnt fly when it happens to me.
     
    #8
  9. goran_ace

    goran_ace Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2009
    Messages:
    2,833
    Location:
    At Large
    Exactly. What goes around comes around.
     
    #9
  10. Douggo

    Douggo Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2005
    Messages:
    548
    Location:
    Minnesota
    I wag my naughty bits when playing doubles to rattle my opponents' nerves.

    Works at all levels.
     
    #10
  11. Ken Honecker

    Ken Honecker Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2009
    Messages:
    384
    Location:
    Spokane, Washington
    You lost me when you said 4.5-5.0 with glaring holes in your games. I was under the impression that by that level players had mastered fundamentals.
     
    #11
  12. makinao

    makinao Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Messages:
    282
    ^ Is that that 4.5 - 5 COMBINED ?
     
    #12
  13. Ken Honecker

    Ken Honecker Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2009
    Messages:
    384
    Location:
    Spokane, Washington
    I don't think it is possible to get a 4.5 combined is it? I thought warm bodies automaticly rated a 2.5.
     
    #13
  14. LuckyR

    LuckyR Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    6,404
    Location:
    The Great NW
    Hahahahahaha, good one!
     
    #14
  15. ttbrowne

    ttbrowne Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 29, 2008
    Messages:
    1,618
    I've never seen 5.0's with weak second serves and shady groundstrokes.
     
    #15
  16. Bud

    Bud Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Messages:
    31,165
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    I've never seen a 4.5 or 5.0 with a weak second serve and/or weak groundstrokes. If they truly are that level, they should have no problem with you going directly at them when at net. In fact, they should expect it.

    Perhaps, you're overestimating both yours and your opponents NTRP.

    What you're describing sounds more like 3.5 level play.
     
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2009
    #16
  17. ryangoring

    ryangoring Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2007
    Messages:
    1,080
    Location:
    Daytona Beach via Barbados
    Or combined 2.5 play
     
    #17
  18. 5263

    5263 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2008
    Messages:
    10,398
    Aw come on guys. It's all relative. There are weak second serves at 5.0 or even 7.0 relative to others at that level.
     
    #18
  19. SlapShot

    SlapShot Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Messages:
    2,423
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    I would be seriously surprised if a 4.5 or 5.0 player who was a solid volleyer at that level ever got "rattled" by someone going at them. On the contrary, they should be able to stick the volley, unless the person that they're playing is Gonzo.
     
    #19
  20. nfor304

    nfor304 Banned

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,456
    Aiming at the head at 5.0 level would just translate to easy shoulder high volleys for the net player.....
     
    #20
  21. Bungalo Bill

    Bungalo Bill G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    11,885
    Come on Hova, what are you doing? Going after people? Injuring them? Busting their eye out? You do know that is a possibiity if you go after someones head with a hard shot. And what if he deflects the ball into his eye and becomes blind in that eye? Are you going to feel good about it?

    Further, what doubles league has a 4-5 to 5-0 team with weak second serves and poor net play?
     
    #21
  22. autumn_leaf

    autumn_leaf Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Messages:
    1,928
    Location:
    Taunton, MA
    i would go for hard body shots. not the face though. that's plain dangerous as Bill says above. there was a thread on the board where the user got hit in the eye and became partially blind because it knocked off some nerve endings. it's one thing to want to win, but it's a sport where people want to have fun. if you cause blindness you basically just ended another player's tennis game for good.
     
    #22
  23. pabletion

    pabletion Professional

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    967
    Location:
    Court No. 1 (or No. 5, when not available)
    4.5-5.0???

    [​IMG][/URL][/IMG]
     
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2009
    #23
  24. LuckyR

    LuckyR Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    6,404
    Location:
    The Great NW
    Whenever folks with little to no matchplay experience blow about how this or that intimidation tactic is oh so successful, I ask: "would such a tactic intimidate you?" The answer is usually, "nah, I am difficult to intimidate cuz of my excellant competitive nature". Well, duh, why do they think they are the only ones with a competitive nature?
     
    #24
  25. LafayetteHitter

    LafayetteHitter Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,954
    Location:
    Lafayette, Louisiana
    If this lame tactic is working then I think you are not playing true 4.5-5.0 players. That might work with your little nephew but not a benchmark 4.5. Lame try
     
    #25
  26. LeeD

    LeeD Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    35,707
    Yes, unless you hit from well inside the baseline, can hit the shot well over normal first service speeds, anything up around chest to a foot overhead is a putaway winner, even for me at 4.0 level (but used to be much better). Higher with tons of topspin can cause troubles, and of course, lower than knee high usually causes some weaker return (not clean putaway, but lowback and between the two opponents).
     
    #26
  27. Burt Turkoglu

    Burt Turkoglu Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2004
    Messages:
    267
    ...not actually sure about this thread but I am one of those steady net ppl with quick hands and I know a little about playing against those who have huge, hard groundies. When you have a ball that sits up a little a few feet inside the baseline, an excellent tactic is to go right into my body....if that's what you mean by headhunting.....that's cool....if on the other hand it means that you have a highball close to net and you have an easy putaway as the close-in net player turns sideways or his back to you (in effect conceeding the point) and you TRY to hit him......IT'S GO TIME.....now if I dig in and try to save the point, I'm fair game.....that's how I see it
     
    #27
  28. Slazenger07

    Slazenger07 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2009
    Messages:
    1,068
    Indeed....
     
    #28
  29. onehandbh

    onehandbh Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,029
    For some reason, sometimes when I'm hitting groundstrokes
    to someone at the net to give them volley practive, I end
    up hitting it right at them and sometimes toward their
    head. I'm not hitting it very hard during these times, but still,
    I'm sure it's pretty annoying.

    Regarding headhunting. I think it's usually dumb and unnecessary.
    I mean would you want someone to smack you with an
    overhead when you're at the net? Your opponents could get
    the opportunity to do that in the course of a match when you
    hit a weak reply. If someone is headhunting me over and over,
    eventually I'd probably nail him in the shin area with
    with an overhead.
     
    #29

Share This Page