I wish Men's Tennis was 3 sets also

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by acura9927, Sep 10, 2012.

  1. acura9927

    acura9927 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Messages:
    487
    I really enjoyed yesterday's women's final and how the excitment was not dragged out too long to lose momenteum. Some of men's matches lasts way too long. I would like to see Best of 3 in all the finals so we get to see total urgency in every round. No more falling asleep in the 1st set than crushing the opponent next 3 which makes me flip the channel most of the time.
     
    #1
  2. zam88

    zam88 Professional

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2009
    Messages:
    1,341

    I'm torn on this.

    sometimes i agree, other times i'm thankful for 5 sets because i think there would be a lot more upsets without the 5 set matches and more undeserving champions.... although having said that the vast majority of "masters 1000" tournaments have also been won by Fed, Nadal, Djoker, and Murray also.


    But i agree it's gotten to the point where I'd just as soon either skip watching the first set, or DVR it and fast forward though most of it.


    The AO this year was for all intents and purposes a great match... but I can't watch porn for 6 hours let alone watch a tennis match. I'm not sure whether the people that were there at the match were ultimately just relieved it was over, or if they were truly entertained.

    I can't even imagine playing that long... let alone from a physical perspective... but the mental one as well..

    I DVR'd that match and still fast-forwarded though a set and a half and still watched 3 hours of tennis.
     
    #2
  3. JRstriker12

    JRstriker12 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2006
    Messages:
    3,365
    IIRC - The master series level tournaments are already best out of 3.

    I'm fine with leaving the Grand Slams as best out of 5. I was at the US Open for the Murray vs. Berdych semi-final

    With a 5-7, 6-2, 6-1, 7-6(7) scoreline the match couldn't have been better. anyone can get hot for a set or two, but best out of 5 at the slams makes it a real test of fitness as well as tennis. That fourth set was a real nail-bitter after Murray cooled off and Tomas stepped up his game.

    Besides, have you seen how many women's matches end in a 2 set blow out? Where's the drama in that? This year was the first US Open women’s final that went three sets since 1995!!

    I'd be ticked as a ticket holder to drop $200+ and get a match that was over in about 90 minutes.

    I could see just making everything from the quarters on a 5 setter and leaving the early rounds at best out of 3 maybe...

    But overall, I'm fine with the current format.
     
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2012
    #3
  4. skip1969

    skip1969 Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Messages:
    6,447
    Location:
    Pleasantville
    it happens four times a year. is it really such a tragedy?
     
    #4
  5. redpurusha

    redpurusha Rookie

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    289
    The thing is, is that while it only happens 4 times a year, most fans (or a large chunk of) only watch tennis at these four times.

    At least speaking for myself. I rather much more go out and play the other times they play.

     
    #5
  6. Vrad

    Vrad Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2012
    Messages:
    591
    The problem isn't that 5 sets are too many. How come we never heard these complaints in the 90s? The problem is that the game has been slowed down to such an extent that every point is a rally-fest. And worse, the conditions now reward defensive players, who simply return the ball, than aggressive players who take chances.

    Every slam today feels like the FO out of the 90s.
     
    #6
  7. redpurusha

    redpurusha Rookie

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    289
    Thats true Vrad.

    I GOT IT. How about we keep the 5 setters in place, but 4 games wins a set?! Anyone? (sound of crickets)

     
    #7
  8. acura9927

    acura9927 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Messages:
    487
    Well its looks like todays Finals will be the length of 2 Batman movies.
     
    #8
  9. Vrad

    Vrad Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2012
    Messages:
    591
    Djokovic seems to have heard this board, and is trying his hardest to make that not happen.
     
    #9
  10. West Coast Ace

    West Coast Ace G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    13,495
    Location:
    So Cal
    Don't bother with these kids. What they really are saying is 'the quality of tennis in the men's matches has been sub-par because of the wind. So they shouldn't play as long.

    I think a lot of these people are really pro wrestling fans - they want scripted entertainment.

    Do I wish there hadn't been so much wind? Of course. But these guys are pros - not the 1st time they've played in adverse conditions. Excuses and $0.50 will get you a bad cup of coffee.
     
    #10
  11. redpurusha

    redpurusha Rookie

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    289
    I watched the 1st set. I went and played a match with a friend. I come back and its the start of the 5th set. Okay. I'm managing this. I'm a tennis fan but I just don't want to watch it for five hours rather play.
     
    #11
  12. nadalforum

    nadalforum New User

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2012
    Messages:
    11
    "women" playing sports for a living? pff back in my days (1800's) women played best of 1 set.
     
    #12
  13. JRstriker12

    JRstriker12 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2006
    Messages:
    3,365
    If you want to go play, then go play. There are times where I've gone an played, recorded the match on a DVR and watched it later.

    But there are also times where I've sat down and been mesmerized by a tight 5 set match and enjoyed every point.

    I'd also argue that if you actually attend the event and buy tickets (grand slams are not cheap - the nose bleed seats in Ashe have a $125 face value for a semi final), you may appreciate the longer match.
     
    #13
  14. mistik

    mistik Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2010
    Messages:
    1,892
    Best 3 matches can never created matches like 07 and 08 Wimbledon finals.No just No.
    The problem of yesterday match is not the time.Both player has same style and which makes it boring.Plus conditions didnt help either.
     
    #14
  15. tacou

    tacou Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,036
    The tennis season is, what, 10 months long? And only 5 tournaments feature best of 5 sets.

    You see week in week out guys like Murray, Federer, Nadal getting upset in 3 set matches. It's the nature of that format.

    I don't want grand slam finals determined by chance. The final yesterday was engrossing. Sure watching something for 5 hours can be a bit demanding, but change the channel for awhile.

    Murray would have been crowned US Open champions 76(10) 75 and the rest of the world would be saying--if it was best of 5 he would've choked. But now we know.
     
    #15
  16. Alchemy-Z

    Alchemy-Z Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2010
    Messages:
    1,503
    Location:
    Augusta, GA
    I normally check score (up until the 3rd set) then I actually watch

    so I normally only watch 3 sets MAX anyway

    so I would be fine with this.
     
    #16
  17. yellowoctopus

    yellowoctopus Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2006
    Messages:
    1,420
    Location:
    the present
    Most of us have to work avg. 40 hrs/wk for our paychecks. Why should these gifted freaks (envy, yes) deserve a break.

    Let them work for the money, I say :)

    [​IMG]
     
    #17
  18. LuckyR

    LuckyR Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    6,404
    Location:
    The Great NW

    I don't disagree that the format should not be changed. But I wouldn't use that argument. The reason the fab four get beat in best of 3 isn't the best of three format, it's that the tournament isn't a life or death motivator for them, mentally.

    Someone did the math and if you look at Slam results and just used the first three sets, the best of 5 format would change the outcome in an incredibly small percentage of matches. Yesterday's match not being one of them, ho hum...
     
    #18
  19. Danny_G13

    Danny_G13 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2012
    Messages:
    158
    No one has yet actually explained WHY men play best of 5 in slams and OG final.

    There is no logical reason for it.
     
    #19
  20. JRstriker12

    JRstriker12 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2006
    Messages:
    3,365
    IIRC - up until about 2007, most men's tournaments were best of 5, all the GS and most masters series. Seeing as that's the normal format / rules that's the logical reason why.

    Masters changed to best of 3 recently.
     
    #20
  21. North

    North Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2005
    Messages:
    937
    Lol. ^^^This - exactly. It didn't used to be boring to watch those longer matches when the average shots per point was maybe 5-6 (I have no idea if that is correct, but that's what it felt like) instead of 20+ shots of 2 players just running back and forth along the baseline. It's gotten so that I watch the first set for a while just to see how both players look coming out of the gate. Unless one player is actively trying to be offensive, get to the net, and/or end points quickly, I just tune in periodically to see how the match is going, until the final set. It's too bad - used to be a lot more fun to watch tennis.
     
    #21

Share This Page