If fed wins RG does that mean they've sped up RG aswell lol

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by tennis-hero, May 20, 2009.

?

IF Fed wins RG does that mean they've secretly sped up RG aswell lol

  1. yes

    33.3%
  2. no

    37.0%
  3. Nalbandian 2-1 (should be 3-0)

    29.6%
  1. tennis-hero

    tennis-hero Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,090
    Location:
    uk
    question- can Fed really beat Rafa (who isn't "tired") on slow clay
     
    #1
  2. aphex

    aphex Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,263
    Location:
    athens, greece
    Nadal is ALWAYS tired

    if fed wins, it will be because roland garros plays like orange carpet nowadays...
     
    #2
  3. West Coast Ace

    West Coast Ace G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    13,771
    Location:
    So Cal
    No. It will mean they put Paris on stilts and it's at 2000 ft above sea level!

    I respect the &^$%*^% out of Rafa - but lost a little of that respect due to his diva comments - must be dating Serena! A true champion would have adapted to any changes. It was still clay and the altitude is the same - he could have flattened out to take advantage of it like Fed did. Fed was the better player last Sunday. No one held a gun to his head to play Barcelona - he's got a huge points lead - could have apologized to the fans and told them he had to make a tough choice.
     
    #3
  4. Well the ATP requires a certain number of 500 tournaments so he has to play SOMETHING right?

    Also, do you lose respect when Federer gives actual excuses why he lost, such as "I lost Wimbledon because it was too dark"? Or saying usually the better player doesn't always win at the AO? How horrible of a comment is that? So if Nadal says he was a little tired cuz he just played a 4 hour match it's a diva comment? Get real.
     
    #4
  5. cknobman

    cknobman Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2007
    Messages:
    6,226
    Location:
    Saudi Arabia
    If Fed wins FO it will mean:

    Nadal was tired and/or injured
    Fed had an easy draw
    The clay courts were too fast and firm
    There is no depth in mens tennis.\
     
    #5
  6. T1000

    T1000 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    4,402
    Location:
    Connecticut
    last option
     
    #6
  7. mandy01

    mandy01 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    11,518
    Roger isnt the only one to speak about light at Wimby..Even Nadal said he'd have stopped playing had he lost his serve at 8-7.Also,Roger at first did not say this statement.The question was asked to him twice( rephrased the second time) unlike Nadal who was asked once.He even said that Nadal should've probably won in four sets.So its not really an excuse.It does sound like one but he was just disappointed that the match had to end in the darkness .
    And if you saw the final set of AO and saw those 7 unforced errors in a row you'd know what Roger's talking about after being 30-0 .Even Nadal said Roger had too many mistakes in fifth set or something along those lines.For the first four sets Federer even without the serve had moments where it looked like he was going to win.

    That said -Nadal is no diva.He will have his reasons.His fans however are going overboard.
     
    #7
  8. West Coast Ace

    West Coast Ace G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    13,771
    Location:
    So Cal
    But not back to back to back. That was poor planning. He could play a 500 in late Sept or Oct - oops, they're not clay! My bad.

    I'm sticking with the diva comment. And I have no problem saying Fed's a bit of a diva too. He certainly gets a little pouty after some losses. The difference though a) the play at Wimby should have been stopped - it was too dark - but TV $$$$ commands a finish - so be it; b) Rafa threw out the altitude whine on Thurs - he was laying the groundwork for an excuse before the loss - he also mentioned the poor condition of the courts - last time I looked, he and his opponents had the same chance to get a bad bounce.
     
    #8
  9. tennis-hero

    tennis-hero Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,090
    Location:
    uk
    interesting point about Nalbandian apart from the fact that he owns Rafa is that based on peak play he could have won any HC/clay slam... i dont think he was ready to win on grass, however- anything is possible on this new green clay like grass
     
    #9
  10. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,655
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Dont you get bored starting troll threads.
     
    #10
  11. tennis-hero

    tennis-hero Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,090
    Location:
    uk
    I haven't created a single troll thread

    and whats sad is *IF* Federer wins, you and V, and NAdal Freak, and gj and all the other haters will be going on and on about how fast RG was playing, how tired Rafa was, and how lucky Fed got
     
    #11
  12. kraggy

    kraggy Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Messages:
    769
    Another 5 star thread, man you're on fire! (Takes mental picture of thread to preserve in memory for eternity)
     
    #12
  13. ronalditop

    ronalditop Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,745
    Location:
    in my room
    +1 :-D .
     
    #13
  14. Nadal_Freak

    Nadal_Freak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,625
    Location:
    Harker Heights, Texas
    Fed won't win RG. So the poll is worthless.
     
    #14
  15. theduh

    theduh Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Messages:
    768
    Location:
    Middle earth
    He did that already in Hamburg 2007.
     
    #15
  16. sh@de

    sh@de Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,979
    Answer to OP's question, duh. Well, there'll be a combo of things e.g. Nadal was tired... Djoker took Nadal to 5 sets... Nadal's knee was injured etc.
     
    #16

Share This Page