If Fed wins the FO sans playing Nadal...

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Dark Victory, Apr 27, 2007.

?

If Fed wins the FO sans playing Nadal...

  1. No, it shouldn't be taken against him at all

    20 vote(s)
    74.1%
  2. Yes, his win would be somewhat questionable

    7 vote(s)
    25.9%
  1. Dark Victory

    Dark Victory Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2006
    Messages:
    248
    I had this convo with a hitting buddy a few days ago on the possibility of Federer winning the FO sans meeting Nadal. Now if that happens, if Raf crashes out due to injury, burnout or whatever, would that be considered a knock against Fed? Regardless of opponent, a win is a win. But still, would it raise an asterisk on Fed's victory considering he's never beaten Nadal on clay?
     
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2007
    #1
  2. Heavy Metal Tennis Star

    Heavy Metal Tennis Star Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2007
    Messages:
    1,162
    Location:
    U.S. And A.
    no asterisks, nadal isnt a player that will make excuses, and any fan with a brain wouldnt doubt feds win either, a win is a win.
     
    #2
  3. bluescreen

    bluescreen Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,636
    yeah, a win's a win. if nadal were to pull out w/ an injury (which i doubt he would), it would be cuz fed was pushing him to do so w/ his play. wouldn't be anything against fed.
     
    #3
  4. splink779

    splink779 Guest

    Sure it shouldn't take anything away from Federer's slam, but tennis fans will be talking about it forever into the future.
     
    #4
  5. psamp14

    psamp14 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    3,301
    if federer and nadal meet in the french open final again, and nadal retires with an injury...say tied at 1 set all and on serve in the 3rd, or even if he's up 2 sets to 1 and down a double break in the 4th....it will be controversy forever but it wasnt in federer's control...

    but i hope this doesnt happen, and the two meet again, this time being an epic 5 setter....
     
    #5
  6. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,540
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    What if Nadal injures himself early in the tourney?
    I don't think it would be an asterisk. You have to win 7 five setters on clay to win Roland Garros. Why is people always looking for asterisks? A win is a win. Winning FO is the most difficult task in the tour, despite who's on the other side of the net.
     
    #6
  7. tintin

    tintin Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Messages:
    1,438
    Location:
    none of your damn business
    a win is a bloody win with or without Nadal in the finals :D
     
    #7

Share This Page