While watching Chang during the 90's I always thought he had bad luck playing in the era where power (off the ground and attacking players) became so important. You had Agassi, Sampras, Jim C, Muster, older Becker and Edberg etc..... It seemed like Chang would simply get over powered by the big boys at the biggest stages. At the time I always thought that if he played in the eighties (late wood and early graphite era) he would have won a few more grand slams. Now looking back, I think I would disagree with my previous what if scenario. Could Chang really be able to beat the early 80's boys of Borg, Mac, and Connors and then later in the 80's Wilander, Lendl, Becker, and Edberg? Of course he could be these guys on any given day, but would he be able to do it consistently to win a few more slams?